G. Raju et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 1201–1203
1203
1
0.4
0.2
0.2
A.
B.
C.
522
625
581
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.15
538
0.1
448
0.05
500
600
700
400
500
600
-600
-400
-200
Wavelength, nm
Wavelength, nm
Figure 2. Comparative characterization of safranine O and p-methoxysafranine 7. Absorbance spectra of oxidized (black lines), reduced (grey lines) and fluorescence emission
(dotted lines) spectra of oxidized safranine O (panel A) and p-methoxysafranine 7 (panel B). Emission spectra were produced by exciting at 522 and 538 nm, respectively. (C)
Potentiometric comparison of safranine O (filled circles) and p-methoxysafranine 7 (open circles) in 0.2 M sodium phosphate, 0.2 M NaCl, pH 7.0 buffer. Lines are fits with the
Nernst equation with n = 2.0 electrons. Potentials are referenced to a Ag/AgCl2 electrode.
The gold working electrode was coated with 1-mercaptohexanol
by soaking the slides in a 1-proponal solution containing 1-merca-
ptohexanol 1% (v/v) for 20 h. The applied potential is set by using a
PWR-3 Power Module potentiostat (Bioanalytical Systems Inc.).
Spectra were collected in a PerkinElmer Lambda 35 UV/vis spec-
trometer. Safranines were dissolved in water containing 0.2 M
sodium phosphate, 0.2 M NaCl, pH 7.0. The applied potentials are
referenced against Ag/AgCl2 which is +210 mV (NHE). Solutions
were equilibrated at each potential for at least ten minutes before
spectra were collected. Absorbance values at the oxidized maxi-
mum were used to calculate the fractional oxidation at each poten-
tial and these data were fit with the Nernst equation.
ture support from P41 GM-66354 to the New York Structural Biol-
ogy Center and the NIH National Center for Research Resources to
CCNY (NIH 5G12 RR03060). B.R.L. gratefully acknowledges support
by NIH Grant GM41048.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (synthetic details and product character-
ization) associated with this article can be found, in the online ver-
References and notes
Figure 2C depicts the data obtained for the two compounds in pH
7.0 buffer solution. p-Methoxysafranine 7 has a reduction potential
125 mV higher than that of safranine O. Each displays two-state
behavior, directly transforming from the oxidized state to the two-
electron reduced state during the titration. No semiquinone spectral
intermediates are observed. The two-electron nature of these reduc-
tions are further evinced both by the presence of isosbestic wave-
lengths in each titration and by the fact that the fits to the titration
data each report a 2.0 0.1 electron reduction. Thus a protein con-
taining 7 as a cofactor will have 125 mV, or 5.75 kcal/mol, more driv-
ing force for two-electron oxidative reactions such as the oxidation
of nicotinamide cofactors such as NADH and NADPH.
In conclusion, we have developed a synthetic route to a flavin-
like cofactor, a safranine O analogue which incorporates a single
substitution at a point far removed from the phenazine headgroup
at which reduction occurs. This route enables the inexpensive incor-
poration of an isotopic reporter atom at the reduction site. This ana-
logue displays large differences in both reduction potentials and
photophysical properties from its parent compound. We are cur-
rently exploring in more detail the pH-dependent oxidation–reduc-
tion potentials of both one- and two-electron reduction of both
molecules in solution, and investigating their properties when com-
plexed with artificial proteins designed to bind and activate them.
1. Cui, D. T. et al J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 7788–7798.
2. Muchowski, J. M.; Venuti, M. C. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 4798–4801.
3. Kelkar, A. A.; Patil, N. M.; Chaudhari, R. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7143–
7146.
4. Nanda, V.; Koder, R. L. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 15–24.
5. Manifar, T. et al Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 789–798.
6. Koder, R. L.; Dutton, P. L. Dalton Trans. 2006, 25, 3045–3051.
7. Osby, J. O.; Martin, M. G.; Ganem, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 2093–2096.
8. Lu, Y. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9, 118–126.
9. Meth-Cohn, O.; Smith, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 5–7.
10. Fry, H. C. et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3997–4005.
11. Bender, G. M. et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10732–10740.
12. Zhuang, J. Y. et al Biochemistry 2006, 45, 12530–12538.
13. Lichtenstein, B. R. et al Chem. Commun. 2009, 168–170.
14. Sharp, R. E. et al Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 10465–10470.
15. Massey, V. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2000, 28, 283–296.
16. Koder, R. L. et al Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 5517–5520.
17. Cerda, J. F. et al Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2204–2212.
18. Schopfer, L. M.; Ludwig, M. L.; Massey, V. In A Working Proposal for the Role of
the Apoprotein in Determining the Redox Potential of the Flavin in Flavoproteins:
Correlations between Potentials and Flavin pks, in Flavoproteins and Flavins; Cruti,
B., Ronchi, S., Zanetti, G., Eds.; Walter de Gruyter: New York, 1990.
19. Koder, R. L. et al Biochemistry 2002, 41, 14197–14205.
21. Iordanov, V. P. Proc. IEEE Sens. 2004 2004, 2, 810–813.
22. Clarke, W. M. Oxidation Reduction Potentials of Organic Systems; The Williams
and Wilkins Co.: Baltimore, 1960.
23. Draper, R. D.; Ingraham, L. L. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 802–808.
24. Heichert, C.; Hartmann, H. Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung Section B-a J. Chem. Sci.
2009, 64, 747–755.
25. Goodbrand, H. B.; Hu, N. X. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 670–674.
26. Koder, R. L. et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15200–15208.
27. Yoneda, F. et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 830–835.
Acknowledgments
R.L.K. gratefully acknowledges support by the following Grants:
S06GM008168 from the National Institutes of Health, infrastruc-