Fig. 2 Concentration of uncomplexed ligand 1 (-), dimer 2 (5) and the
open form (:) upon addition of Zn(CF3SO3)2 to a 5.5 mM solution of 1 in
CDCl3–CD3CN (80:20) calculated from integrated 1H NMR signals.
Fig. 3 Fluorescence titration experiment of 1 (1025 M in CHCl3–CH3OH
(60+40), lexc = 550 nm) with iron(II) perchlorate; inset: fluorescence
quantum yields upon addition of zinc(II) triflate (5) and iron(II) perchlorate
(-) calculated from the integrated fluorescence spectra.
tion polymer 4 can be concluded. Owing to the extremely rigid
structure of both the perylene bisimide and the metal–tpy-
complex unit a rigid rod-like structure is expected for polymer
4. After precipitation from CHCl3–CH3CN the polymer can
yield of only 0.04 in CHCl3. The complexation can be followed
by a fluorescence titration experiment which shows only a
marginal change in the case of zinc(II) but a significant decrease
for iron(II) (Fig. 3). This result shows that by application of
different metal ions the M(tpy)2-unit can be changed from a
purely structural to a functional unit which opens up interesting
possibilities with regard to the investigation of directional
electron or energy transfer processes within the rigid-rod
polymers. Incorporation of functional metals such as Ru2+ and
Os2+ might be especially appealing.8
In summary, two new perylene bisimide dyes bearing
terpyridine receptor units have been synthesized and assembled
to fluorescent and non-fluorescent dimeric and polymeric
structures by metal ion coordination. It is anticipated that
incorporation of other metal ions in these polymers will lead to
interesting multinuclear assemblies with new photophysical
properties.
1
only be redissolved in DMF. Nevertheless, H NMR spectra
recorded in deuterated DMF prove that the polymeric structure
remains intact also in polar solvents. As for the dimer, evidence
for the reversibility of the tpy-complexation by Zn2+ ions is
given for the polymer, since exceeding the 1+1 stoichiometry of
zinc ions leads to the formation of the open zinc complex and
results in a degradation of the polymeric strands into small
monomeric and oligomeric fragments.
Although the coordination of zinc(II) metal ions to the tpy-
units of 1 and 3 is strong there is little electronic interaction
between the Zn(tpy)22+ unit and the perylene bisimide chromo-
phore according to UV/Vis and fluorescence spectroscopy.
Thus the UV/Vis spectra show almost unchanged absorption
properties of the chromophore upon dimerization (2) and
polymerization (4) at wavelengths l > 350 nm. At shorter
wavelengths, i.e. 250–350 nm, a small increase in the
absorption attributed to tpy-complexation can be observed.
Table 1 shows the fluorescence quantum yields determined in
chloroform and DMF. The intense fluorescence of the ligand is
preserved in the dimer and only decreased by 20% for the
polymer (which could only be investigated in DMF for
solubility reasons).
Notes and references
† The synthesis of these compounds will be published elsewhere. All
1
compounds have been characterized by H NMR, mass spectrometry and
elemental analysis.
1 R. H. Friend, R. W. Gymer, A. B. Holmes, J. H. Burroughes, R. N. Marks,
C. Taliani, D. D. C. Bradley, D. A. Dos Santos, J. L. Brédas, M. Lögdlund
and W. R. Salaneck, Nature, 1999, 397, 121.
2 C. J. Brabec, N. S. Sariciftci and J. C. Hummelen, Adv. Funct. Mater.,
2001, 11, 15.
Additional functional possibilities for such photoluminescent
supramolecular polymers are exemplified by an experiment in
which the zinc(II) metal salt is replaced by iron(II) perchlorate
hexahydrate. Here NMR titrations indicate that the complex
formation is not reversible at r.t. so that no decomposition of the
respective Fe(tpy)22+ complexes takes place in the presence of
excess iron(II). Even more importantly, the perylene bisimide
fluorescence is drastically quenched to a fluorescence quantum
3 J. S. Wilson, A. S. Dhoot, A. J. A. B. Seeley, M. S. Khan, A. Köhler and
R. H. Friend, Nature, 2001, 413, 828.
4 For reviews on metal containing supramolecular polymers see: L.
Brunsveld, B. J. B. Folmer, E. W. Meijer and R. P. Sijbesma, Chem. Rev.,
2001, 101, 4071; M. Rehahn, Acta Polym., 1998, 49, 201.
5 G. D. Storrier, S. B. Colbran and D. C. Craig, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans., 1997, 3011.
6 F. Würthner, A. Sautter, D. Schmid and P. J. A. Weber, Chem. Eur. J.,
2001, 7, 894.
Table 1 Fluorescence quantum yields of ligand 1, dimer 2 and polymer 4
7 R. P. Thummel and Y. Jahng, Inorg. Chem., 1986, 25, 2527; E. C.
Constable and A. M. W. Cargill Thompson, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.,
1994, 1409.
8 A. Harriman and R. Ziessel, Chem. Commun., 1996, 1707; J.-P. Sauvage,
J.-P. Collin, J.-C. Chambron, S. Guillerez, C. Coudret, V. Balzani, F.
Barigelletti, L. De Cola and L. Flamigni, Chem. Rev., 1994, 94, 993.
Ffl
CHCl3
DMF
Ligand 1
Dimer 2
Polymer 4
0.92
0.90
—
0.75
0.74
0.61
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 1878–1879
1879