Organic Letters
Letter
Scheme 1. Asymmetric N-Acyl Nitrene Transfer Reactions
Table 1. Optimization of Imidation Using 3-Phenyl-1,4,2-
dioxazolone as a Nitrene Source
a
b
c
entry
catalyst
solvent
THF
THF
THF
1,4-dioxane
Et2O
AcOEt
toluene
CH2Cl2
MeOH
CH3CN
THF
yield (%)
ee (%)
d
e
1
2a
2a
2b
2b
2b
2b
2b
2b
2b
2b
2b
2b
NR
−
84
95
90
81
93
90
94
−
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
>99
>99
>99
73
>99
>99
>99
trace
46
10
76
95
97
f
11
g
>99
88
Recently, we reported that (OC)ruthenium−salen com-
plexes 2 are efficient catalysts in asymmetric nitrene transfer
reactions such as imidation of sulfides, aziridination of olefins,
and C−H aminations, using N-sulfonyl and N-alkoxycarbonyl
azides as nitrene sources (Figure 1).5c,16−18 These ruthenium-
catalyzed nitrene transfer reactions using azides could be
expected to prompt further development of N-acyl nitrene
transfer reactions.
12
THF
a
Reactions were carried out using 1a (0.13 mmol) and 3a (0.1 mmol)
with ruthenium complex 2 (2 mol %) at 25 °C for 24 h, unless
otherwise specified. Isolated yield, based on sulfide 3. Determined
by HPLC with a chiral stationary phase. N-Benzoyl azide (0.13
mmol) was used as the nitrene source instead of 1a. No reaction was
observed. Carried out with 2b (1 mol %) and 4 Å molecular sieves
(20 mg) for 18 h. Carried out on a 1.0 mmol scale with 2b (0.2 mol
b
c
d
e
f
g
%) and 4 Å molecular sieves (20 mg) for 24 h.
With the optimized conditions in hand, we conducted the
asymmetric imidation using 3-substituted 1,2,4-dioxazolones 1
as nitrene precursors with methyl phenyl sulfide in the
presence of complex 2b as the catalyst (Table 2). The reaction
of para- and meta-substituted 3-phenyl-1,2,4-dioxazolones 1b−
k gave better yields than the ortho-substituted derivatives 1l−o,
and high enantioselectivities were obtained in all cases (90−
98% ee) (entries 1−14). In addition, 3-alkyl- and 3-alkenyl-
1,2,4-dioxazolones 1p−u could be also successfully applied as
the nitrene source. 3-Methyl-, 3-pentyl-, and 3-(2-propyl)-
dioxazolones 1p−r gave desired products 4 with good
enantioselectivity and moderate to high yields (entries 15−
17, respectively). However, no reaction occurred when using
dioxazolone 1s as the nitrene source (entry 18). Furthermore,
3-(E)-propenyldioxazolones 1t also produced the correspond-
ing N-acyl sulfimides 4ta with good enantioselectivities (entry
19).
We further examined the asymmetric sulfimidation of
various sulfides 3 using the complex 2b/3-phenyldioxazolone
1a system (Scheme 2). In general, aryl methyl sulfides 3b−g
gave the desired products 4 with high enantioselectivities and
high yields, irrespective of the electronic nature and position of
the substituents. Ethyl phenyl sulfide 3j and benzyl phenyl
sulfide 3k also underwent the N-acyl imidation with moderate
stereoselectivities. Meanwhile, benzyl methyl sulfide 3l gave an
89% ee, albeit sluggish. Fortunately, the chemical yield of 4al
was improved to 99% by using a 4 mol % catalyst loading.
Dialkyl sulfides 3m−p also gave the products with good to
high enantioselectivities, and sterically hindered dialkyl sulfides
such as methyl 2-propyl sulfide 3n and methyl tert-butyl sulfide
3o afforded yields better than those of the less hindered
sulfides 3m and 3p. Ethyl propyl sulfide 3p also gave the
desired sulfimide 4ap with acceptable enantioselectivity (75%
ee).
Figure 1. Cross-selective oxidative coupling between two different
arenols.
We conducted the N-acyl imidation of methyl phenyl sulfide
3a using ruthenium−salen complex 2a as the catalyst (Table
1). No reaction was observed in the presence of N-benzoyl
azide (entry 1). Fortunately, 3-phenyl-1,4,2-dioxazol-5-one 1a
gave the desired sulfide 4aa with 84% ee in quantitative yield
without any activation such as heating or photoirradiation
(entry 2). Diazene and isocyanate derivatives were not
observed under those conditions. Encouraged by these results,
we conducted the N-acyl imidation of methyl phenyl sulfide 3a
using 3-phenyl-1,2,4-dioxazol-5-one 1a as the nitrene precursor
with a series of ruthenium complexes 2 as catalysts (Table 1,
entries 2 and 3, and Table S119). Complex 2b showed the best
enantioselectivity (95% ee) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) as the
solvent. The imidation with te complex 2b/dioxazolone 1a
system in nonpolar and less polar solvents proceeded with
good to high enantioselectivities (entries 3−8). On the other
hand, the reaction in methanol was sluggish (entry 9).
Acetonitrile could be used as the solvent, albeit with reduced
yield and enantioselectivity (entry 10). It was also possible to
reduce the catalyst loading to 0.2 mol % in THF without
affecting the chemical yield or the enantioselectivity (entries 11
and 12).
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX