1786
D. A. James et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 1784–1787
Table 3. Comparison of the cytotoxicity of 5b and Taxol against a
range of cancer cell lines
tion of interesting compounds is also shown in Scheme 1.
Isoxazoles 4i–j and 4l–m were active and for both pairs
of isomers simple methyl substitution did not affect cyto-
toxicity. However, when a larger more bulky group is
introduced such as a fused phenyl ring (4k) then virtu-
ally all the biological effect is lost. Thiazole amides are
tolerated (4n) but bulky substitution within the thiazole
ring is detrimental to activity (4o). Isothiazole 4p was
shown to be the most potent derivative within this series
and one of the most potent compounds we had discov-
ered within this program (up to five times more active
than the next most potent compounds). The exact rea-
sons for its outstanding activity are uncertain but it ap-
pears to have the correct ring size and orientation of
heteroatoms to produce the strong cytotoxic effect. It
is quite striking to compare compound 4q with 4p and
to note that the introduction of a chloro-substituent
causes almost complete loss of potency, illustrating the
importance of the positioning of the group in the correct
orientations or the delicate electronic nature of the ac-
tive system.
Cell line
Cytotoxicity, IC50 (lM)13,16
5b
Taxol
MDA435
HL60
P388
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.05
0.02
0.005
0.005
0.01
0.005
0.005
5
DU145
MES-SA
MES-SA/DX5
HL60/TX1000
5
suggests that 5b is not a substrate for the efflux pump
transporters.
In summary, this SAR study has shown that the indole-
glyoxylamides possess strong cytotoxicity against a
range of cancer cell lines including cell lines that show
resistance to Taxol. The specific orientation of substitu-
ents around the indole center was shown to be vital for
potency suggesting specific interactions of these groups
with a biological target. We have also shown that the in-
dole center core can be replaced with an indolizine cen-
ter core without loss of potency. These indolizine
compounds represent a novel class of anticancer agents.
Next, we investigated different center cores in an attempt
to replace the indole moiety. After screening numerous
cores (the majority of which were completely inactive
or possessed minimal activity) we found that the indoli-
zine compound 5a15 (see Table 2) which is analogous to
the indole derivative 4p had comparable activity. This
discovery shows that for this series of compounds that
indolizine appears to be a suitable biostere for indole.
References and notes
1. For recent reviews, see: (a) La Porta, C. A. M. Curr. Med.
Chem. 2007, 14, 387; (b) Perez-Tomas, R. Curr. Med.
Chem. 2006, 13, 1859.
We also found that substituents in the para-position of
the benzyl-substituent were well tolerated and a cyano-
group (see 5b within Table 2) provided a more potent
compound. Compound 5b was screened against a range
of cancer cell lines originating from different tissues and
the results are summarized in Table 3.16
2. (a) Lagas, J. S.; Vlaming, M. L.; van Tellingen, O. W.; Els,
J.; Jansen, R. S.; Rosing, H.; Beijnen, J. H.; Schinkel, A.
H. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 6125; (b) George, J. A.;
Chen, T.; Taylor, C. C. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 10381.
3. (a) Baran, Y.; Gunduz, U.; Ural, A. U. Exp. Oncol. 2006,
28, 163; (b) Huang, R.; Murry, D. J.; Kolwankar, D.;
Hall, S. D.; Foster, D. R. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2006, 71,
1695; (c) Yang, Y.-X.; Xiao, Z.-Q.; Chen, Z.-C.; Zhang,
G.-Y.; Yi, H.; Zhang, P.-F.; Ii, J.-L.; Zhu, G. Proteomics
2006, 6, 1615.
4. (a) Brooks, T. A.; O’Loughlin, K. L.; Minderman, H.;
Bundy, B. N.; Ford, L. A.; Vredenburg, M. R.; Bernacki, R.
J.; Priebe, W.; Baer, M. R. Invest. New Drugs 2007, 25, 115;
(b) Lou, P.-J.; Lai, P.-S.; Shieh, M.-J.; MacRobert, A. J.;
Berg, K.; Bown, S. G. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 119, 2692; (c)
Meyer-Losic, F.; Quinonero, J.; Dubois, V.; Alluis, B.;
Dechambre, M.; Michel, M.; Cailler, F.; Fernandez, A.-M.;
Trouet, A.; Kearsey, J. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6908.
5. For a review on epothiolones in clinical trials, see: Larkin,
J. M. G.; Kaye, S. B. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2006,
15, 691.
As shown in Table 3, 5b was effective against all cell lines
including the multidrug resistant cell lines MES-SA/
DX5 and HL60/TX1000 which were resistant to treat-
ment with Taxol. Both these cell lines possess high levels
of MDR1 mRNA and Pgp and show cross resistance to
a wide range of common chemotherapeutic agents. This
Table 2. Comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicity of compounds against
the Taxol resistant HL60/TX100014 cell line
CH3
N
HN
O
S
6. For a recent review, see: Dubois, J. Expert Opin. Ther.
Pat. 2006, 16, 1481.
O
7. For a review on new tubulin inhibitors in the clinic, see:
Kuppens, I. E. L. M. Curr. Clin. Pharmacol. 2006, 1, 57.
8. James, D. A.; Li; Koya, K.; Li, H.; Chen, S.; Xia, Z.;
Ying, W.; Sun, L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16,
5164.
X
Y
R
9. (a) Bacher, G.; Beckers, T.; Emig, P.; Klenner, T.;
Kutscher, B.; Nickel, B. Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73,
1459; (b) Bacher, G.; Nickel, B.; Emig, P.; Vanhoefer, U.;
Seeber, S.; Shandra, A.; Beckers, T. Cancer Res. 2001, 61,
392.
Compound
X
Y
R
Cytotoxicity IC50 (lM)13
4p
5a
5b
C
N
N
N
C
C
Cl
Cl
0.01
0.06
0.02
CN