1160
K. S. Gudmundsson et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 1157–1161
selected 7-substituted pyrazolopyridines11b (1, 21–22)
for comparison, is shown in Table 1. As can be deter-
mined from Table 1 the 5- or 7-substituted pyrazolopyri-
dines show similar potency. In general the C5 amines are
significantly more potent than the C5 chloro com-
pounds. Also the more lipophilic amines (e.g., cyclopen-
tylamine) are in general more potent than the smaller,
less lipophilic amines.
tained by m-CPBA oxidation of 39 to the sulfoxide, fol-
lowed by treatment with an alkoxide. Compounds 41
and 42 are better suited for development than the thiol
derivatives, which are potentially liable to in vivo oxida-
tion and thus risk of formation of a reactive metabolite.
Compounds 43–46 (Table 2) were prepared similarly.
Since the 5-amino derivatives (like 10) were displaying
increased activity over the chloro analogs (like 9), it be-
came of interest to look into ether substituents at the C5
position. Since transition metal catalyzed couplings of
alcohols with aryl halides are significantly less developed
than the amine coupling reaction, we sought an alterna-
tive synthetic route to access the 5-alkoxy derivatives.
Toward that end, the N-amino-4-methoxypyridine 47
was treated with diaryl acetylene 48 to give the 5-meth-
oxypyrazolopyridine 49 as outlined in Scheme 4. The
2-cyclopentyl amine substituent on the pyrimidine was
installed through oxidation of 49 to the sulfoxide and
subjected to thermal displacement to provide the desired
scaffold 50 as the 7-protio derivative. Lithiation of the 7
position as described above and sulfenylation proceeded
smoothly to provide a handle for further functionaliza-
tion. Oxidation and amine displacement again served
to provide the 5,7-disubstituted analog 52. Standard
demethylation with BBr3 gave the phenol and realkyla-
tion with assorted alkyl halides resulted in the 5-alkoxy
analogs 54–56. The above SAR study further delineates
the SAR of the pyrazolopyridine scaffold. Several mole-
cules with significantly (5- to 10-fold) better potency
than the current gold standard acyclovir were identified,
thus establishing the disubstituted pyrazolopyridines as
an exciting template for anti-HSV drug discovery.
Potent activity of both 7-substituted as well as 5-substi-
tuted pyrazolopyridines prompted us to consider mak-
ing 5,7-disubstituted pyrazolopyridines. As outlined in
Scheme 2 the C7 protio derivative 9 could be treated
with a strong base to selectively deprotonate the 7 posi-
tion.13 This could be further functionalized by trapping
the resulting anion with an electrophile, such as CCl4, to
give the 5,7-dichloropyrazolopyridine 23.
Use of n-BuLi for deprotonation did not seem to result in
significant C5 chloro exchange (the C5 protio derivative
was not isolated from the reaction mixture) nor did it ap-
pear to direct the deprotonation to the 4 or 6 positions.
Buchwald coupling conditions were then used to cleanly
replace the C7 chlorine (to give 24) without significant
reaction of the C5 chlorine as long as the reaction was
carried out under 100 °C. At higher temperatures both
the C5 and C7 chlorines could be replaced with alkyl-
amines to give 25. Compounds 26–36 were made in a
similar fashion as outlined in Scheme 2.
Additional 5,7-disubstituted derivatives were synthe-
sized from 10 as outlined in Scheme 3. Compound 10
was treated with excess n-BuLi followed by quenching
with a suitable electrophile. Especially potent were com-
pounds 38–40, obtained by quenching lithiated 10 with
alkyl disulfides. 7-Alkoxy derivatives 41 and 42 were ob-
References and notes
Cl-
1. Roizman, B.; Pellett, P. E. In Fields Virology; Knipe, D.
M.; Howley, P. M., Eds.; Lippincott Williams and
Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, 2001; Vol. 2, 2381.
2. (a) Kleymann, G. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2003, 12,
165–183; (b) Corey, L.; Spear, P. New Engl. J. Med. 1986,
314, 686; (c) Corey, L.; Handsfield, H. H. J. Am. Med.
Assoc. 2000, 283, 791.
3. (a) Moomaw, M. D.; Cornea, P.; Rathbun, R. C.; Wendel,
K. A. Expert Rev. Anti-infect. Ther. 2003, 1, 283; (b)
Firestine, S. M. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2004, 14, 1139.
4. Elion, G. B.; Furman, P. A.; Fyfe, J. A.; De Miranda, P.;
Beauchamp, L.; Schaeffer, H. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1977, 74, 5716.
F
NH2
N+
N
N
N
F
a
OMe
48
N
N
OMe
47
49
N
SMe
SMe
X
N
N
N
F
b,c
Y
N
N
H
5. Perry, C. M.; Faulds, D. Drugs 1996, 52, 754.
6. Jarvest, R. L.; Sutton, D.; Vere Hodge, R. A. Pharm.
Biotechnol. 1998, 11, 313.
7. (a) Garland, S. M. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 16, 85; (b)
Taff, J. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2003, 4, 214; (c)
Spruance, S. L.; Tyring, S. K.; Smith, M. H.; Meng, T. C.
J. Infect. Dis. 2001, 184, 196.
50 X = H,
51 X = SMe,
52 X = -NHcPentyl Y = -OMe
53 X = -NHcPentyl Y = -OH
54 X = -NHcPentyl Y = -OCH2CH2OMe
Y = -OMe
Y = -OMe
d
e,f
g
h
55 X = -NHcPentyl Y = -OiPr
56 X = -NHcPentyl Y = -OCH2cPr
8. (a) Oien, N. L.; Brideau, R. J.; Hopkins, T. A., et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 724; (b) Wathen,
M. W. Rev. Med. Virol. 2002, 12, 167; (c) Jurk, M.; Heil,
R.; Vollmer, J., et al. Nat. Immunol. 2002, 3, 499.
9. (a) Crute, J. J.; Grygon, C. A.; Hargrave, K. D.;
Simoneau, B.; Faucher, A.-M.; Bolger, G.; Kibler, P.;
Liuzzi, M.; Cordingley, M. G. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 386; (b)
Kleymann, G.; Fischer, R.; Betz, U. A. K.; Hendrix, M.;
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) DBU, MeCN (55%); (b) m-
CPBA, CH2Cl2 0 °C; (c) cyclopentylamine (neat), 85 °C, 1 h (69%); (d)
LDA, THF À78 °C, then MeSSMe (91%); (e) m-CPBA, CH2Cl2 0 °C
(99%); (f) cyclopentylamine (neat), 130–145 °C, 24 h (65%); (g) BBr3,
CH2Cl2 À78 °C to rt, 3 d (66%); (h) Cs2CO3, MeCN, alkyl halide; for
54 MeOCH2CH2Br (47%), for 55 2 bromopropane (35%), for 56
c-PrCH2Br (26%).