dianhydrides (DFAs) are paradigmatic examples. DFAs have
been isolated from microorganisms7 and higher plants8 and
have also been identified in food materials such as caramel
and chicory.9
the thermodynamically favored diastereomer, since it can
accommodate the oxygen substituents in an axial orientation
and the carbon substituents in an equatorial disposition with
the central 1,4-dioxane ring in a chair conformation. Such a
situation does not prevail for the C2-symmetric di-R- and
di-â-D-fructofuranose 1,2′:2,1′-dianhydrides 2 and 3, respec-
tively, which must adopt a boat conformation at the central
ring in order to accommodate the anomeric effect at both
anomer centers, a less favorable arrangement (Figure 1).5
Despite the variety of general methods existing for the
construction of the spiroketal moiety, the control of the
stereochemistry at the anomeric center is, almost exclusively,
based on the relative thermodynamic stability of the different
isomers in the acid-catalyzed spiroketalization. When all
factors that control spirocyclization, i.e., a maximum ano-
meric effect and minimum steric interactions, are reinforcing,
a major isomer is produced. The stereoselectivity is lower
when these factors are in conflict. In tricyclic systems,
however, such general statements must be applied carefully.
A range of structures can usually accommodate the basic
requirements with rather small differences in energy and low
interconversion barriers. Actually, the dimerization reaction
of D-fructose under acidic conditions leads to a complex
mixture of up to 13 DFA isomers that differ in the ring size,
linking position, and stereochemistry at the acetal stereo-
centers, seven of which possess a tetraoxadispiro core with
either the [4.2.4.2]-, [5.2.4.2]-, or [5.2.5.2]tetradecane ar-
rangement (Figure 1, types I-III, respectively).5
We have previously devised a stereoselective synthesis of
2, having a trans relative disposition between the anomeric
oxygen atoms and the vicinal hydroxyl groups, by taking
advantage of the participating character of O-acyl groups
during the Lewis acid-catalyzed glycosylation-spirocycliza-
tion reaction of 1,2-O-isopropylidene-â-D-fructofuranose
precursors.10 We now report the highly diastereoselective
preparation of the di-â-isomer 3 by implementing the concept
of intramolecular aglycon delivery (IAD),11 originally in-
troduced by Hindsgaul12 and Stork13 for the synthesis of
â-mannosides, to the control of the stereochemical outcome
in spiroketalization processes.
Our strategy relies on the significant differences in the
through-space distance between the primary hydroxyl groups
of the nonsymmetric 1 and the C2-symmetric DFA isomers
2 and 3 in their most stable conformations. The restriction
of this parameter by incorporation of an appropriate tether
should favor the latter compounds by fixing the boat
conformation. In a first approach, the m-xylylene spacer,
previously used by Schmidt in oligosaccharide synthesis,14
was considered. Thus, the dimeric 1,2-O-isopropylidene-â-
D-fructofuranose derivative 8 was prepared by a reaction
sequence involving selective protection of the primary
(7) (a) Tanaka, K.; Uchiyama, T.; Ito, A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1972,
284, 248-256. (b) Tanaka, K.; Sonobe, K.; Uchiyama, T.; Matsuyama, T.
Carbohydr. Res. 1979, 75, 340-344. (c) Matsuyama, T.; Tanaka, K.;
Mashiko, M.; Kanamoto, M. J. Biochem. 1982, 92, 1325-1328. (d)
Haraguchi, K.; Kishimoto, M.; Seki, K.; Hayashi, K.; Kobayashi, S.;
Kainuma, K. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1988, 52, 291-292. (e) Kawamura, M.;
Takahashi, S.; Uchiyama, T. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1988, 52, 3209-3210. (f)
Matsuyama, T.; Tanaka, K.; Uchiyama, T. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1991, 55,
1413-1414.
(8) Li, H.; Zhu, W.; Yokoyama, C.; Harada, N. Carbohydr. Res. 1997,
299, 301-305.
(9) (a) Defaye, J.; Garc´ıa Ferna´ndez, J. M. Carbohydr. Res. 1994, 256,
C1-C4. (b) Defaye, J.; Garc´ıa Ferna´ndez, J. M. Zuckerindustrie 1995, 120,
700. (c) Manley-Harris, M.; Richards, G. N. Carbohydr. Res. 1996, 287,
183-202. (d) Ratsimba, V.; Garc´ıa Ferna´ndez, J. M.; Defaye, J.; Nigay,
H., Voilley, A, J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 844, 283-293.
Figure 1. Tricyclic dispiroketal frameworks present in di-D-fructose
dianhydrides: tetraoxadispiro [4.2.4.2]tetradecane (I), tetraoxa-
dispiro [5.2.4.2]tetradecane (II), and tetraoxadispiro [5.2.5.2]-
tetradecane core (III). The three possible type I DFA diastereomers
1-3 are also shown.
(10) Benito, J. M.; Go´mez-Garc´ıa, M.; Ortiz Mellet, C.; Garc´ıa Ferna´n-
dez, J. M.; Defaye, J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 549-552.
(11) Here we are using the notion of intramolecular aglycon deliVery in
a broad sense, to refer to transformations involving an intramolecular
glycosylation reaction in which the acceptor and the donor moieties are
linked through a tether that controls the stereochemical outcome, to produce
product distributions different from those obtained in the intermolecular
process, and that can be further removed. It should be noted, however, that
classical IAD glycosylation reactions proceed to give, preferentially, the
kinetic product, which is not necessary true in the present case.
(12) (a) Barresi, F.; Hindsgaul, O. Can. J. Chem. 1994, 72, 1447-1465.
(b) Barresi, F.; Hindsgaul, O. Synlett 1992, 72, 759-761. (c) Barresi, F.;
Hindsgaul, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9376-9377.
(13) (a) Stork, G.; La Clair, J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 247-
248. (b) Stork, G.; Kim, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1087-1088.
(14) (a) Mu¨ller, M.; Schmidt, R. R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 2055-
2066. (b) Mu¨ller, M.; Huchel, U.; Geyer, A.; Schmidt, R. R. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 6190-6201. (c) Huchel, U.; Schmidt, R. R. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 7693-7694.
The stereoselective synthesis of DFAs of type I is
particularly challenging due to the presence of two five-
membered rings, for which the anomeric effect is consider-
ably reduced as compared with six-membered rings. Of the
three possible type-I diastereomers, the nonsymmetrical R-D-
fructofuranose â-D-fructofuranose 1,2′:2,1′-dianhydride 1 is
(6) Recent syntheses: (a) Li, X.; Takahashi, H.; Ohtake, H.; Shiro, M.,
Ikegami, S. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 8053-8066. (b) Dondoni, A.; Marra,
A.; Scherrmann, M.-C.; Bertolasi, V. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 1371-1382.
874
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 6, 2003