Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
(Figure 3A, entry 10) shows a low barrier for metalation, but a
much higher barrier for Giese addition, which makes the
generation of cross-coupling product more favorable (SI Table
S7). Overall, these results convincingly demonstrate an
unappreciated yet critical effect of hydrogen bonding in
controlling product formation in metallaphotoredox cross-
couplings.
tert-butyl acrylate under standard conditions was the three-
component cyclopropane-containing adduct 75. An additional
product, a [3 + 2] cycloaddition adduct (76), was isolated as
well. This product was presumably generated from cyclo-
propane ring opening followed by Giese addition and cis-
selective 5-exo-trig cyclization to achieve a cyclopentane-
containing α-hydroxy radical (vide infra), which could undergo
subsequent DCF reactivity (Figure 5B).46 Similar reactivity
was observed in our previous DCF report when employing an
organotrifluoroborate derived from (S)-verbenone, which
produced a [4 + 2] cycloaddition adduct.13 Under identical
conditions, reaction with acrylonitrile produced some cyclo-
propane-containing DCF product (78). However, the major
product obtained in this system was a two-component cross-
coupled product (77), which stemmed from α-cyclopropyl
radical ring opening. Computed energetics for these systems
(Figure 5C) show that ring opening of the α-cyclopropyl
radical (TS-81) is competitive with Giese addition to either
acrylate or acrylonitrile and thus account for the mixture of
both cyclopropyl DCF products (75 and 78) and various ring
opened products (76 and 77). We propose that 76 and 77
stem from primary radical 81 (generated from reversible
cyclopropane ring opening), which could undergo either Giese
addition to the corresponding alkene or metalation to the Ni
center (not calculated). The formation of 77 as the major
product in the reaction with acrylonitrile suggests that TS-82 is
higher than the barrier for metalation of 81. Conversely, the
absence of 77 and the formation of 76 in the reaction with tert-
butyl acrylate is rationalized by the significantly lower barrier of
Giese addition of 81 to the acrylate. As demonstrated by the
transition state structure (TS-84), hydrogen bonding between
81 and acrylate is responsible for the accelerated Giese
addition leading to 84. We therefore conclude that hydrogen
bonding is again a prevailing factor in determining product
selectivity in this DCF protocol.
In an effort to understand the hydrogen bonding
interactions between various radical and alkene components
in the Giese addition step more fully, we performed
hydroalkylation competition reactions (Figure 4). Isopropanol
preferentially engaged acrylates and acrylonitrile in hydro-
alkylation in comparison to the less electrophilic acrylamide
(Figure 4A; entries 1 and 2). However, i-PrOH underwent
hydroalkylation with only a slight preference for acrylonitrile
over adamantyl acrylate. Complete selectivity for addition to
acrylonitrile over adamantyl acrylate was observed using
diisopropyl ether as a C−H precursor (Figure 4A, entry 4).
The calculations in Figure 4C rationalize the dissimilar
selectivities of alcohols and ethers observed in the hydro-
alkylation competition reactions. In particular, we attribute the
significant decrease in ΔΔG‡
for i-PrOH compared to
CN/CO2R
diisopropyl ether to the presence of hydrogen bonding
between the hydroxyl and the acrylate. Addition of a
chaotropic reagent (MgCl2) in entry 5 resulted in high
selectivity for hydroalkylation of acrylonitrile with i-PrOH. We
attribute the dissimilar selectivities in entries 3 and 5 to the
disruption of hydrogen bonding between i-PrOH and
adamantyl acrylate when MgCl2 is present. A control reaction
demonstrated that hydroalkylation of adamantyl acrylate with
i-PrOH is not inhibited by the presence of excess MgCl2.
Furthermore, a similar trend in chemoselectivity for i-PrOH
and diisopropyl ether was observed in competition reactions
between acrylonitrile and phenyl vinyl sulfone, which is again
attributed to the presence/absence of hydrogen bonding in the
Giese addition transition states (entries 6 and 7).
As evident in entry 8, the presence of β-substitution on the
alkene significantly retards the rate of Giese addition. Next,
equimolar ratios of acrylonitrile and tert-butyl acrylate were
subjected to the standard DCF conditions using either i-PrOH
or CPME as the C−H precursor (Figure 4B). When i-PrOH
was used as the C−H precursor, the ratio of DCF products
greatly favored the acrylate. However, CPME exhibited an
equivalent ratio of DCF products. Because of these unexpected
results, we conducted a DCF reaction of i-PrOH with
acrylonitrile under standard conditions, which produced an
atypically high ratio of hydroalkylation/DCF products (Figure
4D). On the basis of these experiments and calculated
transition state energies in Figure 4C, it is apparent that the
ratio of DCF products in these complex reaction systems is not
solely governed by the rates of each Giese addition. As such,
we conclude that the arylation step is significantly impacted by
the steric and electronic nature of Giese adducts (69−72) as
well as the presence or absence of hydrogen bonding in NiIII
complexes (66668, 74). We are currently pursuing further
detailed calculations (including quasi-classical molecular
dynamic simulations) to probe this hypothesis and these
results will be reported in due course.
CONCLUSIONS
■
A novel multicomponent DCF strategy has been developed
that relies on a sustainable and chemoselective mode of HAT
catalysis. New insights into the nature and effect of hydrogen
bonding in radical/alkene reactivity as well as metallaphotor-
edox cross-coupling have been discovered. We anticipate that
not only will these findings provide a new and efficient strategy
for small molecule synthesis but also that the mechanistic
insights will prompt further discovery in the area of radical
reactivity mediated by hydrogen bonding.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
sı
* Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at
Experimental details and spectral data (PDF)
Accession Codes
CCDC 2046230 contains the supplementary crystallographic
data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge
bridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road,
Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.
Finally, we employed 1-cyclopropyl ethanol as a C−H
precursor, anticipating that the resultant alkyl radical could
trigger ring-opening of the α-cyclopropane ring prior to
undergoing Giese addition and/or metalation (Figure 5A). To
our astonishment, the major product from the reaction with
3908
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 3901−3910