M, Aldrich) as a solvent. The reaction was complete within
20 min at 0 °C and for the first time allowed access to
multigram quantities of 6. Fe(III)-mediated ring opening/
radical cyclization of 6 proceeded well using three different
radical traps2 and produced the cyclopentanes 7-9 as 7:1
mixtures of cis:trans isomers (Scheme 2).
Scheme 3 a
Scheme 2 a
aReagents and conditions: (a) 3-butenylmagnesium bromide,
TMSCl, HMPA, THF, -78 °C, 84%; (b) Et2Zn, CH2I2, 0 °C, 91%;
(c) Fe(NO3)3, N-chlorosuccinimide, DMF, 50% 12; (d) Fe(NO3)3,
PhSSPh, DMF, 58% 13 (9:1 with minor diastereoisomer); (e)
Fe(NO3)3, 1,4-cyclohexadiene, DMF, 60% 14b (9:1 with minor
diastereoisomer) and 31% 15b.
suggesting that termination to 14b was caused by hydrogen
atom abstraction from DMF. Repeating the reaction in
dimethylacetamide (DMA) improved matters somewhat, and
the ratio of 14b:15b was almost 1:1. These optimized
conditions were then used for the other cyclopropanes
described in Table 1. Cyclization of 11a (R ) H) gave only
a Reagents and conditions: (a) 3-butenylmagnesium bromide,
TMSCl, HMPA, THF, -78 °C, 86%; (b) Et2Zn, CH2I2, 0 °C, 88%;
(c) Fe(NO3)3, 1,4-cyclohexadiene, DMF, 2.5 h, 57% (7a:7b ) 7:1);
(d) Fe(NO3)3, N-chlorosuccinimide, DMF, 65% (8a:8b ) 7:1); (e)
Fe(NO3)3, PhSSPh, DMF, 60% (9a:9b ) 7:1).
We then sought to explore the stereochemical influence
of a substituent in the cyclization as we had done previously
for cyclopropanone acetals.2 The phenyl-substituted enol-
ether 10 was synthesized and cyclopropanated as before to
yield the cyclization substrate 11b (R ) Me) in high overall
yield. Fe(III)-mediated cyclization using either NCS or
PhSSPh as radical traps furnished the cyclized products 12
(sole product) and 13 in reasonable yield, with minor
amounts (9:1) of another diastereomer of 13 obtained. The
relative stereochemistry of 13 was obtained by X-ray
crystallography of the corresponding 2,4-dinitrophenylhy-
drazone.7 To our surprise, however, when 11b was treated
with Fe(NO3)3 and 1,4-cyclohexadiene as a H-atom donor,
the expected cyclization product 14b was formed along with
a very unusual tricyclic ether product 15b (Scheme 3).
We then sought to probe the scope of this likely cascade-
type sequence by synthesizing a range of substituted cyclo-
propylsilyl ethers bearing a phenyl group in the side chain.
All the cyclopropanes 11a-e were synthesized from known
enones by the conjugate addition-cyclopropanation sequence
used above. Initially, we sought to increase the proportion
of 15b by slowing down the rate of hydrogen atom
abstraction from radical intermediates leading to 14b.
Surprisingly, carrying out the reaction without 1,4-cyclo-
hexadiene made little difference in the ratios of 14b and 15b,
Table 1. a
11
R
15 (%)
14 (%)
a
b
c
d
e
H
Me
Et
nBu
iPr
56
45
40
37
33
50
34
29
23
a Other minor diastereomers were formed in ratios of 9:1, 5:1, and 3:1
for compounds 11b, 11c, and 11d,e, respectively. The stereochemistry not
assigned.
the tricyclic ether 15a. Interestingly, the relative size of the
R group was found to have a significant effect on both the
yield and the stereochemistry of the products. As the size of
R increased, the yield of 15 decreased. This was matched
by a decrease in the observed stereoselectivity of the
monocyclization products 14c-e. Only the major isomers
of 14b-e have been depicted, as it was not possible to assign
the relative stereochemistry of the minor products. Attempts
to synthesize phenyl derivatives of 11 (R ) Ph and
pMeOC6H4) were unsuccessful as the corresponding enol-
ethers failed to undergo cyclopropanation.
(4) Furukawa, J.; Kawabata, N.; Nishimura, J. Tetrahedron 1968, 24,
53.
(5) Denmark, S. E.; Edwards, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 6974.
(6) Jenkins, H. Unpublished results.
(7) See Supporting Information.
1108
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 7, 2003