2860
C. Pouget et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 2859–2861
Scheme 1.
given in Table 1 except for the coupling constant
between H-3eq and H-4 which could not be measured
due to the broadening of the signals for these two pro-
tons. The assignment of stereochemistry to these 4-imi-
a quasi-equatorial position for the proton H-4 and
allowed to determine a 2,4-trans configuration for these
two compounds. This configuration was confirmed by
the occurrence of the H-4 signal as a triplet; indeed, in
the 2,4-trans-4-substituted flavans, J3ax,4 and J3eq,4 are
sufficiently close for the H-4 signal to appear as a triplet.8
1
dazolylflavans was readily made on the basis of the H
NMR vicinal coupling constants. As previously descri-
bed for 4-substituted flavans, the coupling constants for
these two compounds were consistent with either the
half-chair (a) or sofa (b) conformation of the hetero-
cyclic ring in which the 2-aryl group was equatorial and
H-2 was axial (Scheme 2).7,8
All 13C NMR signals could be assigned by the C–H
correlation and long-range C–H COSY techniques. The
C-4 resonance for compounds 5 and 6 at about 50 ppm
was characteristic for a C–N type bond.
For the compound 5, the occurrence of four protons at
d 2.38 (br dt, J=2.6 and 14.5 Hz), 2.48 (ddd, J=4.4,
11.2 and 14.5 Hz), 4.97 (dd, J=2.2 and 11.2 Hz) and
5.34 (br t, J=3.7 Hz) was characteristic for the hetero-
cyclic ring of a 4-substituted flavan. The two highest
field signals were assigned to H-3eq and H-3ax for
which the geminal coupling constant was 14.5 Hz.
Among the other constants for these two protons, the
value 11.2 Hz was the only one which could arise from a
trans-diaxial coupling and therefore corresponded to the
constant between H-2 and H-3ax. This allowed H-2 to
be assigned as the signal at 4.97 ppm and H-3ax as the
signal at 2.48 ppm. Consequently, H-4 resonated at d
5.34 ppm. In the same way, for the compound 6, the
signal at 5.02 ppm was assigned to H-2 and the signal at
2,4-trans-4-Imidazolyl-7-methoxyflavan 5. Yield 38%;
1H NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): d 2.38 (1H, br dt, J=2.6
and 14.5 Hz, H-3eq), 2.48 (1H, ddd, J=4.4, 11.2 and
14.5 Hz, H-3ax), 3.81 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.97 (1H, dd,
J=2.2 and 11.2 Hz, H-2), 5.34 (1H, br t, J=3.7 Hz, H-
4), 6.57 (1H, d, J=1.9 Hz, H-8), 6.59 (1H, dd, J=2.6
and 9.0 Hz, H-6), 6.94 (1H, br s, H-400), 7.04 (1H, d,
J=9.2 Hz, H-5), 7.12 (1H, br s, H-500), 7.34–7.40 (5H,
m, Ph), 7.48 (1H, br s, H-200); 13C NMR (100 MHz;
CDCl3): d 38.3 (C-3), 51.0 (C-4), 55.4 (OCH3), 73.1 (C-
2), 101.6 (C-8), 109.2 (C-6), 109.6 (C-4a), 118.3 (C-400),
126.1 (C-20/60), 128.4 (C-40), 128.7 (C-30/50), 129.7 (C-
500), 131.2 (C-5), 136.8 (C-200), 139.6 (C-10), 156.4 (C-8a),
161.4 (C-7); m/z (EI), M+ 306, (Found: M+, 306.1354.
C19H18N2O2 requires M, 306.1368).
1
5.42 ppm to H-4. Therefore, in the H NMR spectra of
both compounds 5 and 6, the lowest field signal was
assigned to H-4 which was in accordance with previous
results about 4-substituted flavans.9 Then, the coupling
constant between H-4 and H-3ax, which was equal to
4.4 Hz for both compounds 5 and 6, was consistent with
2,4-trans-7-Hydroxy-4-imidazolylflavan 6. Yield 37%;
1H NMR (400 MHz; DMSO-d6): d 2.39 (1H, br dt,
J=3.2 and 14.4 Hz, H-3eq), 2.48 (1H, ddd, J=4.4, 10.4
and 14.4 Hz, H-3ax), 5.02 (1H, dd, J=2.8 and 10.8 Hz,
H-2), 5.42 (1H, t, J=4.0 Hz, H-4), 6.38 (1H, d, J=2.0
Hz, H-8), 6.42 (1H, dd, J=2.0 and 8.4 Hz, H-6), 6.91
(1H, d, J=8.4 Hz, H-5), 6.93 (1H, br s, H-400), 7.13 (1H,
br s, H-500), 7.34–7.40 (5H, m, Ph), 7.57 (1H, br s, H-200),
9.43 (1H, br s, OH); 13C NMR (100 MHz; DMSO-d6): d
37.6 (C-3), 50.2 (C-4), 73.3 (C-2), 103.5 (C-8), 109.9 (C-
6), 110.3 (C-4a), 119.0 (C-400), 126.6 (C-20/60), 128.4 (C-
40), 128.9 (C-30/50), 129.1 (C-500), 131.3 (C-5), 137.1 (C-
200), 140.6 (C-10), 156.1 (C-8a), 159.3 (C-7); m/z (EI),
M+ 292 (found: M+, 292.1200. C18H16N2O2 requires
M, 292.1211).
Table 1. Selected 1H NMR data for compounds 5 and 6
d H-3eq d H-3ax d H-2 d H-4 J3ax-3eq J2ꢀ3ax J2ꢀ3eq J4ꢀ3ax
5
6
2.38
2.39
2.48
2.48
4.97
5.02
5.34
5.42
14.5
14.4
11.2
10.8
2.2
2.8
4.4
4.4
Biological Assay
The inhibitory activities of the compounds 5 and 6
towards aromatase were determined in vitro using human
placental microsomes and [1,2,6,7-3H]-androstenedione
Scheme 2.