764
C. A. BUNTON ET AL.
4.44 (4.87), 4.32 (4.95), and 4.42 (4.95). Values in
varied slightly with changes in the reaction medium
because we used external references, but there was no
effect on signal multiplicities or relative peak areas. In
most compounds that we examined, hydrogens in a given
molecule were in 1:1 ratios, which assisted identification.
The 1H NMR signals of the stock compounds are given in
Table 1.
4
parentheses were with 1.04 Â 10 M IBA.
We attempted to examine the IBA catalyzed hydrolysis
of pNPDPP in the presence of PhSH and HSO5 (as
OXONE). In MeCN–H2O 3:7 v/v, pH 8.5 (nominal),
5
0.1 M NaHCO3 buffer and 2.4 Â 10 M pNPDPP, the
second-order rate constant for reaction with IBA was
1
1
0.56 M
1.0 M
s
at 25.0°C, which is similar to the value of
1
1
s
at pH 7.0 in water.10 We could not obtain
good kinetic data spectrophotometrically in the presence
of OXONE and PhSH, because precipitates formed,
although absorbance at 400 nm increased as expected.
We made qualitative observations on the deactivation
of IBA using thioanisole, 2, and its regeneration on
addition of HSO in H2O–t-BuOH 7:3 v/v, pH 8.5, 0.1 M
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the US Army Research
Office. We are grateful to Professor R. A. Moss for
information on the reaction of IBA and IBX with thiols
and for his prepublication manuscript.
NaHCO3. When510 M pNPDPP was added to 10
M
4
3
IBA at ca. 21°C the solution became yellow within a few
3
minutes. Addition of 10 M 2 stopped color develop-
REFERENCES
ment, but it immediately resumed on addition of
3
2 Â 10 M HSO5 . The color of p-nitrophenoxide ion
1. (a) Y.-C. Yang, J. A. Baker and J. R. Ward, Chem. Rev., 92, 1729
(1992); (b) Y.-C. Yang, Chem. Ind. (London), 334 (1995); (c)
Y.-C. Yang, Accounts Chem. Res., 32, 109 (1999).
2. R. A. Moss, K. Y. Kim and S. Swarup, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 108, 788
(1986).
was unaffected by HSO5 in these conditions, provided
that the pH was maintained.
3. (a) A. R. Katritsky, B. L. Duell, H. D. Durst and B. L. Knier, J.
Org. Chem., 53, 3972 (1988); (b) R. S. Hammond, J. S. Forster, C.
N. Lieske and H. D. Durst, J. Org. Chem., 111, 7860 (1989).
4. F. J. Berg, R. A. Moss, Y. C. Yang and H. Zhang, Langmuir, 11,
411 (1995).
5. (a) R. J. Kennedy and A. M. Stock, J. Org. Chem., 25, 1901 (1906);
(b) R. Bacaloglu, A. Blasko, C. A. Bunton and H. Foroudian, J.
Org. Chem., 5, 171 (1992); (c) C. A. Bunton, H. J. Foroudian and
A. Kumar, J. Org. Chem. 2, 33 (1995); (d) Y. C. Yang, L. L.
Szafraniec, W. T. Beaudry and D. K. Rohrbaugh, J. Org. Chem.,
11, 6621 (1990).
6. C. A. Bunton, M. M. Mhala and J. R. Moffatt, J. Phys. Org. Chem.,
3, 390 (1990); S. Bhattacharya and K. Snehalatha, J. Phys. Org.
Chem., 62, 2198 (1997).
7. F. Ruff and A. Kucsman, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans 2, 683 (1985).
8. C. A. Bunton, H. J. Foroudian, N. D. Gillitt and A. Kumar, ERDEC
Conference on Chemical and Biological Defense Abstract
November, 1998.
9. R. A. Moss, H. Morales-Rojas, H. Zhang and B. D. Park,
Langmuir, 15, 2738 (1999).
10. C. A. Bunton, M. M. Mhala and J. R. Moffatt, J. Phys. Chem., 93,
854 (1989).
11. R. Bacaloglu, C. A. Bunton, G. Cerichelli and F. Ortega, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 110, 3495, (1988).
12. R. A. Moss and H. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 4471 (1994).
13. W. Wolf, J. C. J. Chen and L. J. Hsu, J. Pharm. Sci., 55, 68 (1966).
14. R. A. Moss, K. W. Alwis and G. O. Bizzigotti, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
105, 681 (1983).
NMR spectroscopy
Spectra were monitored typically in H2O–t–BuOH 7:3
v/v on a Varian Unity (INOVA) instrument, 400 MHz
for 1H, in isotopically normal solvents with a D2O
insert, TSP as external reference, and suppression of the
1H signal of H2O. As a result of signal suppression we
saw some ‘spikes’ in the spectra, which appeared in the
absence of reactants and were easily identified. The
breaks in NMR spectra were due to these adventitious
‘spikes’. There was a large signal of CH3 of t-BuOH and
therefore we only monitored signals in the aromatic
region. We used mesitoate (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoate) ion,
ꢀH = 6.86 ppm, s, as a calibrating standard for estimating
extents of reaction.11 The 19F signal of 4-O2NC6H4SO2F
was at 68.5 ppm and that of F was at 112.4 ppm,
relative to CF3Cl ꢀ = 0 ppm measured with CF3CO2H as
an external reference, ꢀ = 76.55 ppm.
1
There was overlap of some H signals of the iodo
compounds and of the oxidation products, but in all
conditions there were sufficient 1H signals to allow
quantification of iodo compounds, based on comparison
of peak areas with that of mesitoate ion. Chemical shifts
15. Y. C. Yang, L. L. Szafraniec, W. T. Beaudry, C. A. Bunton and A.
Kumar, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 607 (1997).
16. A. Blasko, C. A. Bunton and S. Wright, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 5435
(1993).
Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 12, 758–764 (1999)