bis-p-bromobenzoate derivative of 3 was prepared, and
CD spectroscopy, according to the method of Harada and
Nakanishi (exciton coupling), was used to unambiguously
verify the assignment.10 Since both the natural substance6
and the enzymatically synthesized product show negative
specific rotation, the absolute configuration of the former
must also be (R).
Scheme 1. (A) T4HNR-Catalyzed Reduction of its Physiological
Substrate T4HN (1). (B) Retrosynthetic Proposal for the Bio-
mimetic Enzymatic Synthesis of GTRI-02 (3)
The unexpected side product of the enzymatic reduction,
ketodiol 5, was isolated in 1% yield by column chromato-
graphy. Further analysis of the T4HNR-catalyzed reduc-
tion reaction of 4 led to the detection of the presence of
2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone 6, possibly formed by
nonenzymatic aerobic oxidation. Although the transfor-
mation was performed under N2, incomplete removal of
oxygen from the buffer solution might account for the
oxidation of compound 4. We assumed that 2-hydroxy-
1,4-naphthoquinone6 could have beenreducedtodiol 5 by
T4HNR, using 2 equiv of NADPH.
In order to prove this assumption, 6 was prepared in 82%
isolated yield by the oxidation of compound 4 using K2CO3
in DMF.11 Hydroxynaphthoquinone 6 was then employed
as a substrate and was reduced by T4HNR to exclusively give
the above-mentioned vicinal diol 5 with 80% conversion
(60% yield, drcis/trans g 99:1) (Scheme 3). The relative con-
figuration of 5 was elucidated by single-crystal X-ray analysis
of the 4-biphenylboronic ester derivative. The absolute
(3S,4R)-configuration was determined by vibrational cir-
cular dichroism (VCD) and quantum chemical calculations
(Gaussian 0912) (see the Supporting Information).
The biomimetic retrosynthetic analysis of 3 guided us to
the acetylated trihydroxynaphthalene 4 as the required
substrate (Scheme 1, B). Compared to T4HN (1), naphthol
4 contains an additional acetyl group, in principle a poten-
tially better substrate unit to be reduced by oxidoreductases.
Compound 4 was synthesized in four straightforward
steps starting from 3,5-dimethoxyphenylacetic acid in an
overall yield of 25% (see the Supporting Information).
Naphthol 4 was then reduced with T4HNR. NADPH was
used as a cofactor and regenerated using glucose and glucose
dehydrogenase (GDH) in all enzyme-catalyzed reactions.
The transformation proceeded as proposed and resulted in
the formation of GTRI-02 (3) as the major product after 24 h
(17% conversion), supporting the argument for the putative
involvement of a similar naphthol reductase in the biosynthe-
sis of 3.9 Unexpectedly, ketodiol 5 was obtained as a side
product in the same transformation (Scheme 2).
Scheme 3. T4HNR-Catalyzed Reduction of
Hydroxynaphthoquinone 6
Scheme 2. T4HNR-Catalyzed Reduction of 4
T4HNR-catalyzed reduction of 2-hydroxy-1,4-naphtho-
quinone 6 to cis-ketodiol 5 also hints at the possible
(10) Harada, N.; Nakanishi, K.; TatSuoka, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1969, 91, 5896–5898.
(11) Synder, S. A.; Tang, Z.-Y.; Gupta, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
131, 5744–5745.
* NADPH was regenerated using glucose/glucose dehydrogenase.
(12) Gaussian 09, Revision B.01: Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.;
Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.;
Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji,
H.; Caricato, M.; Li, X.; Hratchian, H. P.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Bloino, J.;
Zheng, G.; Sonnenberg, J. L.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.;
Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao,
O.; Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Peralta, J. E.; Ogliaro,
F.; Bearpark, M.; Heyd, J. J.; Brothers, E.; Kudin, K. N.; Staroverov,
V. N.; Kobayashi, R.; Normand, J.; Raghavachari, K.; Rendell, A.;
Burant, J. C.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Cossi, M.; Rega, N.; Millam,
N. J.; Klene, M.; Knox, J. E.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.;
Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.;
Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Martin, R. L.; Morokuma, K.;
Zakrzewski, V. G.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.;
GTRI-02 (3) was isolated and purified by preparative
HPLC (RP-18) to provide pure material in 10% isolated
yield. The absolute configuration was determined as
(R) by using circular dichroism (CD). Additionally, the
(9) 2-Acetyl-1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene (a) and 6-hydroxymu-
sizin (b) were synthesized and tested with T4HNR; however, the
transformations did not result in any reduction. (a) Wheeler, M. H.;
Abramczyk, D.; Puchhaber, L. S.; Naruse, M.; Ebizuka, Y.; Fujii, I.;
Szaniszlo, P. J. Eukaryotic Cell 2008, 7, 1699–1711. (b) Harris, T. H.;
Wittek, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 3270–3271.
€
Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Farkas, O.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.;
Cioslowski, J.; Fox, D. J. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2009.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 14, 2012
3601