8
Communications to the Editor
Macromolecules, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2004
control. Our results are quite encouraging as regards
the use of non-cross-linked high-performance polymers,
such as aromatic polyimides, in molecular imprinting.
Ack n ow led gm en t. This work was supported by the
National R&D Project for Nano Science and Technology.
Refer en ces a n d Notes
(1) Wulff, G. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1.
(2) Haupt, K.; Mosbach, K. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2495.
(3) Bystrom, S. E.; Borje, A.; Akermark, B. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 2081.
(4) Leung, K. P.; Chow, C. F.; Lam, H. W. J . Mater. Chem. 2001,
11, 2985.
(5) Dai, S.; Burleigh, M. C.; Shin, Y. S.; Morrow, C. C.; Barnes,
C. E.; Xue, Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1235.
(6) Vlatakis, G.; Andersson, L. I.; Mosbach, K. Nature (London)
1993, 361, 645.
(7) Marty, J .-D.; Tizra, M.; Mauzac, M.; Rico-Lattes, I.; Lattes,
A. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 8674.
(8) Kobayashi, T.; Reddy, P. S.; Fujii, N. Eur. Polym. J . 2002,
38, 779.
(9) Kobayashi, T.; Fukaya, T.; Abe, M.; Fujii, N. Langmuir 2002,
18, 2866.
F igu r e 3. Amount of bound estrone by the imprinted and
control polyimide films. In all experiments, the amount was
analyzed by HPLC after 0.1 g of the polymers were added to
20 mL of the 1, 2, and 3 mM estrone solutions in chloroform
for 12 h at room temperature. All experiments were repeated
three times.
g of polyimide film was added to the 3 mM sample
solution in 20 mL of chloroform. The tests were con-
ducted using testosterone and testosterone propionate,
which are the structural analogues of estrone but do
not have a phenolic group. The imprinted film showed
higher specific recognition ability for estrone than for
its structural analogues. The results indicate that
template-shaped cavities were imprinted in the poly-
imide matrix. The amino group inside the cavity would
form a hydrogen bond with the phenol moiety of Estron
in the rebinding process.
(10) Ghosh, M. K.; Mittal. K. L. Polyimides; Marcel Dekker: New
York, 1996; pp 279-303.
(11) Chang, J . Y.; Kim, T. J .; Han, M. J .; Chae, K. H. Polymer
1999, 40, 4049.
(12) Ki, C. D.; Oh, C.; Oh, S. G.; Chang, J . Y. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 14838.
(13) Tremblay, M. R.; Lin, S. X.; Poirier, D. Steroids 2001, 66,
821.
(14) Pasqualini, J . R.; Cortes-Prieto, J .; Chetrite, G.; Talbi, M.;
Ruiz, A. Int. J . Cancer 1997, 70, 639.
(15) Xiao, X.; McCally, D. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2000,
12, 1991.
(16) Sodium azide (99%) and dibutyltin dilaurate (95%) were
purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. Estrone (98%) and 3,5-
dinitrobenzoyl chloride (99%) were purchased from TCI.
Methylene chloride and tetrahydrofuran were used after
purification by standard methods. Other chemicals were
used as received without further purification.
(17) Compound 1: Anal. Calcd for C7H3N5O5: C, 35.46; H, 1.28;
N, 29.53. Found: C, 35.56; H, 1.29; N, 29.66. 1H NMR
(DMSO-d6): δ 8.89 (s, 2H benzene ring protons), δ 9.02 (s,
1H benzene ring proton). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz):
123.0, 129.2, 134.3, 149.0, 168.9. IR (KBR pellet, cm-1):
3168 (aromatic C-H stretching), 2157 (N3), 1691 (CdO),
1548, 1358 (NdO stretching).
(18) Compound 2: Anal. Calcd for C25H25N3O7: C, 62.62; H, 5.26;
N, 8.76. Found: C, 62.80; H, 5.32; N, 8.45. 1H NMR (DMSO-
d6): 0.85 (s, 3H), 6.99 (s, 1H), 7.01 (d, 1H), 7.34 (d, 1H),
8.50 (s, 1H), 8.73 (s, 2H), 11.17 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3,
500 MHz): 13.4, 21.0, 25.4, 26.0, 28.9, 31.2, 35.2, 37.8, 43.3,
47.2, 49.4, 112.7, 114.9, 117.7, 118.8, 121.5, 126.0, 137.3,
137.9, 141.1, 148.4, 219.6.
(19) Compound 3: Anal. Calcd for C25H29N3O3: C, 71.57; H, 6.97;
N, 10.02. Found: C, 71.62; H, 7.14; N, 9.63. 1H NMR
(DMSO-d6): 0.84 (s, 3H), 4.68 (s, 4H), 5.53 (s, 1H), 6.00 (s,
2H) 6.86 (s, 1H) 6.91 (d, 1H), 7.28 (d, 1H), 9.5 (s, 1H). 13C
NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): 14.0, 21.8, 26.0, 26.5, 29.6, 30.5,
31.7, 36.1, 38.3, 44.3, 50.7, 96.5, 97.7, 119.1, 121.9, 125.7,
126.6, 137.4, 138.2, 139.4, 148.4, 148.67, 221.0.
(20) Ambade, A. V.; Kulmar, A. J . Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem.
Ed. 2001, 39, 1295.
(21) The thermogravimetric analysis was performed with a TGA
2050 thermogravimetric analyzer (TA instruments, Inc.) at
a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a dried N2 atmosphere.
(22) Reverse phase HPLC analysis was carried out using a M930
solvent delivery system, a M720 UV-vis detector (YOUNG
LIN Instrument Co. Ltd., Korea), a MetaSil 5u ODS column
from Metachem (Torrance, Canada) with methanol as an
eluent at a rate of 1.0 mL/min at room temperature. For
each analysis 20 µL of sample was injected.
F igu r e 4. Amount of bound molecules by the imprinted (MIP)
and control polyimide films. In all experiments, the amount
was analyzed by HPLC after 0.1 g of the polymers were added
to 20 mL of the 3 mM sample solutions in chloroform for 12 h
at room temperature. All experiments were repeated three
times.
Con clu sion . We explored the use of a rigid non-cross-
linked polymer in molecular imprinting. Aromatic poly-
imides have excellent thermal stability and mechanical
strength, which have contributed to their successful
application in several areas, such as films, moldings,
coatings, adhesives, and resin matrices. The template
molecule was attached to the polyimide chain by means
of a thermally reversible urethane bond. The removal
of the template was accomplished by a simple thermal
reaction. Most imprinted materials obtain their rigidity
through a cross-linking reaction, which it is not easy to
MA035199P