the oxygen),3b we decided to manipulate the HOMO-
LUMO energy gap responsible for the emission energy
via attaching electron-withdrawing (EWG) or electron-
donating groups (EDG) to the C5-aryl moieties of the
quinolinolate.
Red -Gr een -Blu e Em ission fr om
Tr is(5-a r yl-8-qu in olin ola te)Al(III)
Com p lexes
Radek Pohl,† Victor A. Montes,† J oseph Shinar,‡ and
Pavel Anzenbacher J r.*,†
At first glance, this approach may not seem as entirely
new. The literature reports that emission tuning via
EWG/EDGs attached to the C5 of 8-quinolinolate was
attempted; however, there did not seem to be a clear
connection between the electronic properties of the C-5
substituent and the emission of the resulting Al(III)
complex.3b For example, attaching the CtN group did
not result in an appreciable blue shift in the emission6a
compared to the parent Alq3 (525 nm). Similarly the
introduction of fluoro6b and chloro substituents6c resulted
only in a small red-shifted emission, to 535 and 540 nm,
respectively. The only example of a successful blue-
shifted emission was reported for piperidine-amide of
quinolinolate-5-sulfonic acid (emission maximum ≈ 480
nm).6d
Recently, we showed that the emission of Alq3 deriva-
tives with aryl-ethynylene moieties attached to the
quinolinolate ligand may allow for tuning of the emission
color in the resulting Al(III) complex.7 These materials
provided an insight into the emission tuning in the
Al(III) quinolinolates; however, the thermal stability
required for OLED fabrication was less satisfactory. Here
we present a series of 5-aryl-quinolinolate Al(III) com-
plexes, in which the electron-withdrawing/-donating
nature of the substituent is projected via the C-5 aryl
bridge to the quinolinolate chromophore.
Center for Photochemical Sciences, Bowling Green State
University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403, and
Ames Laboratory-USDOE and Department of Physics,
Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011
pavel@bgnet.bgsu.edu
Received October 30, 2003
Abstr a ct: A simple yet effective strategy for synthesis of
5-aryl-8-quinolinolate-based electroluminophores with tun-
able emission wavelengths is presented. Two different
pathways for the attachment of electron-donating or electron-
withdrawing aryl groups to the 5-position of the quinolino-
late ligand via Suzuki coupling were developed. A successful
tuning in the emission color was achieved: the emission
wavelength was found to correlate with the Hammett
constant of the respective substituents, providing a powerful
strategy for prediction of the optical properties of new
electroluminophores.
The availability of full-color displays based on the
small-molecule organic light-emitting diode (SMOLED)
technology is predicated upon a successful development
of red-, green-, and blue-emitting electroluminophores.1,2
Organometallic SMOLED materials are valued for their
stability and emission-color purity. The major obstacle
in the fabrication of SMOLED-based full color displays
is the so far limited availability of complexes that span
the whole visible spectrum, while possessing similar
emissive characteristics, physical properties, and pro-
cessability.
Complexes 1a -j were designed to provide a varying
degree of electronic density in the quinolinolate ligand,
which is modulated by the aryl moiety.
Here we present a method for tuning the tris(8-
quinolinolate)Al(III) (Alq3) emission from blue-green to
yellow and red via attaching electron rich/poor aryl
moieties to the 5-position of the quinolinolate ligand. We
selected Alq3 as the most important SMOLED material,
which is also the most stable electron-transporting
compound currently used.2,3 Photophysical properties of
Alq3-type complexes are dominated by ligand-centered
excited states4 originating from the electronic π-π*
transitions in the quinolinolate ligands.5 Because the
highest density HOMOs of the quinolinolates are located
on the phenoxide oxygen and the C5 (para position to
F IGURE 1. Novel 5-aryl Alq3-type complexes prepared.
The synthesis of complexes 1a -j (Scheme 1) departs
from that of 5-bromo-8-hydroxyquinoline,8 which was
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Phone: (419) 372-
2080. Fax: (419) 372-9809.
† Bowling Green State University.
(5) Ballardini, R.; Varani, G.; Indelli, M. T.; Scandola, F. Inorg.
Chem. 1986, 25, 3858-3865.
‡ Iowa State University.
(1) Kelly, S. M. Flat Panel Displays: Advanced Organic Materials;
Connor, J . A., Series Ed.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge,
UK, 2000.
(2) Tang, C. W.; VanSlyke, S. A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1987, 51, 913-
915.
(3) (a) Wang, S. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 215, 79-98. (b) Chen, C.
H.; Shi, J . Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 171, 161-174.
(4) Vogler, A.; Kunkely, H. Luminescent Metal Complexes: Diversity
of Excited States. In Topics in Current Chemistry; Vol. 213, Transition
Metal and Rare Earth Compounds: Excited States, Transitions,
Interactions I; Yersin, H., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany,
2001.
(6) (a) Burrows, P. E.; Shen, Z.; Bulovic, V.; McCarty, D. M.; Forrest,
S. R.; Cronin, J . A.; Thompson, M. E. J . Appl. Phys. 1996, 79, 7991-
8006. (b) Matsumura, M.; Akai, T. J pn. J . Appl. Phys. 1996, 35, 5357-
5360. (c) Organic Electroluminescent Materials and Devices; Miyata,
S., Nalwa, H. S., Eds.; Gordon and Breach Publishers: Amsterdam,
The Netherlands, 1997. (d) Hopkins, T. A.; Meerholz, K.; Shaheen, S.;
Anderson, M. L.; Schmidt, A.; Kippelen, B.; Padias, A. B.; Hall, H. K.,
J r.; Peyghambarian, N.; Armstrong, N. R. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 344-
351.
(7) Pohl, R.; Anzenbacher, P., J r. Org. Lett. 2003, 2769-2772.
(8) Prasad, R.; Coffer, H. L. D.; Fernando, Q.; Freiser, H. J . Org.
Chem. 1965, 30, 1251.
10.1021/jo035602q CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 01/30/2004
J . Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 1723-1725
1723