to react with several Lewis bases [e.g., P(o-tolyl)3, PPh3, 1,2-
bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (DPPE), DABCO, DBU, Et3N,
Me2S], which are commonly employed in the traditional
Morita-Baylis-Hillman reaction,10 in THF under reflux
without the use of Pd(PPh3)4 to give 3a or 3b in 12-71%
yields, respectively (entries 7-16 in Table 1). On the basis
of recent reports11 that the propenoyl moiety can coordinate
to Pd(II), 2a was treated with PdCl2(MeCN)2 alone or a
mixture of PdCl2(MeCN)2 and P(o-tolyl)3. These reactions
gave 3a in 26 and 28% yields, respectively, together with
the recovery of 2a (entries 17 and 18 in Table 1). Upon
treatment with Pd2(dba)3‚CHCl3 alone as a Pd(0) catalyst,
the reaction of 2a scarcely proceeded (entry 19 in Table 1),
but in the presence of P(o-tolyl)3, the yield of 3a was
improved to 83% (entry 20 in Table 1). Thus, it was
demonstrated that the Pd(0) species were essential catalysts,
and the Pd(0)-catalyzed ring-expansion reaction required an
efficient additive such as P(o-tolyl)3. Subsequently, we
investigated the importance of the CdC bond in the
propenoyl moiety of 2a-c. 1-Hydroxy-1-propanoylindan
derivatives 6a-c, obtained by the catalytic hydrogenation
of 2a-c, were subjected to the same reaction conditions as
described above, but the corresponding R-tetralone deriva-
tives 7a-c were obtained in scant amounts, as shown in
Table 2. When 6a was refluxed in the presence of 50 mol
basis of the experimental results described above (Figure
2).2f,10-13 In the first step of the catalytic cycle, the oxidative
Figure 2. Plausible mechanisms for the Pd(0)- and phosphine-
catalyzed ring-expansion reactions of 2a-d.
addition of the hydroxy group of 2a-d to a Pd(0) catalyst
generates the complex A,2f,11-13 in which the reductive
elimination of the Pd(II) species, followed by migration of
the C1-C2 bond in a concerted manner (C), may give the
ring-expanded products 3a-d.
Conjugate addition of the phosphine species to the
propenoyl moiety of A may form complex D,10 in which
synchronous release of the Pd(II) species and the phospho-
nium moiety, followed by the migration of the C1-C2 bond,
would afford 3a-d. In another plausible first step of the
catalytic cycle, the coordination of the propenoyl moiety of
2a-d to the Pd(0) species may generate the weak complex
B, whereby the easy conjugate addition of the phosphine
species10 may generate the phosphonium intermediate E. In
E, hydrogen abstraction from the C1-OH group by the
resulting enolate, followed by ketonization and release of
the phosphonium moiety, would occur, together with syn-
chronous double-bond migration and C1-C2 bond migration
to give 3a-d.
The â-ketol rearrangement reaction of 17-hydroxy-20-
ketosteroids, referred to as the D-homo rearrangement, was
discovered in 1938 and has been the subject of investigation
ever since its discovery.14 Although all rearrangement
reactions of steroidal compounds are typically performed by
employing various bases and Lewis acids,14 such a neutral
Pd(0)- and phosphine-catalyzed rearrangement reaction has
never been reported. Hence, we attempted the ring-expansion
reaction of 17-(1-oxo-2-propenyl)-â-estradiol derivative 9
Table 2. Attempt at Ring-Expansion Reactions of
1-Hydroxy-1-propanoylindans 6a-c
Pd(PPh3)4 P(o-tolyl)3 time
yield
(%)a
entry
6
(mol %)
(mol %)
(h)
product
1
2
3
4
6a
6a
6b
6c
5
50
5
10
100
10
7
24
15
18
7a
7a
7b
7c
10 (87)b
88c
12 (78)b
8 (92)b
5
10
a 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) analysis. b Recovery of starting material.
c Isolation yield.
% Pd(PPh3)4 and 100 mol % P(o-tolyl)3 in THF, 7a could
be obtained in 88% yield. These results suggested that the
presence of the CdC bond in the conjugated propenoyl
moiety of 2a-c was very efficient in the Pd(0)- and
P(o-tolyl)3-catalyzed ring-expansion reactions.
(12) (a) Braga, D.; Sabatino, P.; Bugno, C. D.; Leoni, P.; Pasquali, M.
J. Organomet. Chem. 1987, 334, C46. (b) Bugno, D. C.; Pasquali, M.; Leoni,
P.; Sabatino, P.; Braga, D. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 1390.
Speculative mechanisms for the Pd(0)- and phosphine-
catalyzed ring-expansion reactions can be suggested on the
(13) (a) Camacho, D. H.; Nakamura, I.; Saito, S.; Yamamoto, Y. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3365. (b) Camacho, D. H.; Nakamura, I.; Saito,
S.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 270. (c) Kadota, I.; Lutete, L.
M.; Shibuya, A.; Yamamoto, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6207.
(14) (a) Ruzicka, L.; Meldahl, H. F. HelV. Chim. Acta 1938, 21, 1760.
(b) Creary, X.; Inocencio, P. A.; Underiner, T. L.; Kostromin, R. J. Org.
Chem. 1985, 50, 1932. (c). Bischofberger, N.; Walker, K. A. M. J. Org.
Chem. 1985, 50, 3604. (d) Schor, L.; Seldes, A. M. S.; Gros, E. G. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 163. (e) Paryzek, Z.; Martynow, J. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 823.
(10) (a) Evans, D. A.; Hurst, K. M.; Takacs, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1978, 100, 3467. (b) Basavaiah, D.; Rao, P. D.; Hyma, R. S. Tetrahedron
1996, 52, 8001. (c) Ciganek, E. Org. React. 1997, 51, 201.
(11) (a) Hosokawa, T.; Shinohara, T.; Ooka, Y.; Murahashi, S. I. Chem.
Lett. 1989, 2001. (b) Kawatsura, M.; Hartwig, J. F. Organometallics 2001,
20, 1960. (c) Miller, K. J.; Kitagawa, T. T.; Abu-Omar, M. M. Organo-
metallics 2001, 20, 4403.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 13, 2004
2135