atom in 4-fluorobenzyne, the developing negative charge at the
meta position (vs. para) is stabilized to a greater extent in the
transition state for the addition of a sulfur moiety to 4-fluor-
obenzyne, which leads to the predominant production of 3ka.8 In
contrast, electronic effects of other substituents in 4-subsituted
arynes are so slight that equal addition to both ends of the triple
bond takes place. The exclusive formation of 3la or 3ma would be
attributable to disfavored steric repulsion between a substituent
(MeO or Ph) in the aryne and 2a, which prevents the sulfur atom
approaching the ortho position of the substituent. In the case of
3-methylbenzyne, the steric effect should compete with the
electron-donating effect of the methyl group which prefers
generation of the anion in 4 at the meta position, and a mixture of
3na and 3Ana is formed.6 A diaryl sulfide should arise from a
nucleophilic attack of a fluoride ion to a stannyl moiety (path B),
and formation of a (2-fluoroaryl)tin can be ascribed to a reaction of
a 2-fluoroaryl anion with a stannyl electrophile (path C).9
Scheme 3 Transformation of the thiostannylation product.
Finally, synthetic utility of the thiostannylation product has been
demonstrated by transformation to variously substituted arenes
(Scheme 3). Thus, cross-coupling of 3aa with 4-nitroiodobenzene
gave 4a in 86% yield. Furthermore, homocoupling10 or iodolysis of
3aa afforded biaryl 4b or aryl iodide 4c, respectively.
In conclusion, we have disclosed that the thiostannylation of
arynes takes place with stannyl sulfides to offer diverse 2-(arylth-
io)arylstannanes straightforwardly, which can be utilized for the
synthesis of substituted arenes. Further studies on insertion
reactions of arynes into other element–element s-bonds are in
progress.
We thank Central Glass Co. Ltd. for a generous gift of
trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride.
Notes and references
1 (a) Se–Se and Te–Te s-bond: N. Petragnani and V. G. Toscano, Chem.
Ber., 1970, 103, 1652; (b) S–S s-bond: J. Nakayama, T. Tajiri and M.
Hoshino, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1986, 59, 2907; (c) N–CO s-bond: H.
Yoshida, E. Shirakawa, Y. Honda and T. Hiyama, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed., 2002, 41, 3247.
2 (a) Si–C s-bond: Y. Sato, Y. Kobayashi, M. Sugiura and H. Shirai, J.
Org. Chem., 1978, 43, 199; (b) Sn–Cl s-bond: C.-L. Tseng, S.-H. Tung
and K.-M. Chang, Chem. Abs., 1964, 61, 7035; (c) B–O s-bond: C.-L.
Tseng, K.-M. Chang and S.-H. Tung, Chem. Abs., 1964, 61, 16084.
3 (a) H. Yoshida, Y. Honda, E. Shirakawa and T. Hiyama, Chem.
Commun., 2001, 1880; (b) H. Yoshida, J. Ikadai, M. Shudo, J. Ohshita
and A. Kunai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 6638.
4 Y. Himeshima, T. Sonoda and H. Kobayashi, Chem. Lett., 1983,
1211.
5 A diaryl sulfide (5–21%) and tributyl(2-fluoroaryl)tin (trace–9%) were
formed as by-products in all cases.
6 For a review on the nucleophilic couplings with arynes, see: S. V.
Kessar, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, ed. B. M. Trost and I.
Flemming, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991, vol. 4, pp. 483–515.
7 For reported examples on the nucleophilic couplings of sulfides with
arynes, see: (a) J. Nakayama, S. Takeue and M. Hoshino, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1984, 25, 2679; (b) G. M. Blackburn, W. D. Ollis, C. Smith and I.
O. Sutherland, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1969, 99.
8 A similar regioselectivity was observed in the nucleophilic couplings
with 4-chlorobenzyne: (a) J. F. Bunnett and C. Pyun, J. Org. Chem.,
1969, 34, 2035; (b) J. F. Bunnett and J. K. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1973,
95, 2254.
9 Treatment of 2a with KF/18-Crown-6 did not give a thiophenoxide ion,
which would add to an aryne, if any. Moreover, destannylation of 3aa
did not occur in the presence of KF/18-Crown-6. These results prompt
us to propose path B in the formation of a diaryl sulfide.
10 E. Shirakawa, Y. Nakao, T. Tsuchimoto and T. Hiyama, Chem.
Commun., 2002, 1962.
Scheme 2 Plausible reaction pathways.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 9 8 0 – 1 9 8 1
1981