of a phenol, (2) the use of a chiral nitrile-substituted dioxane
to establish a quaternary center, and (3) an unusual rear-
rangement of a hydroxylmethyl-substituted dioxane that
favors the formation of the seven-memberred ring acetal.
As part of a projected investigation of the photochemistry
of cross-conjugated cyclohexadienones in the context of the
synthesis of resineferatoxin and analogues, we designed a
strategy to access a highly functionalized carbocyclic core
distinct from the route we had previously employed for the
tricyclic system. We aimed at a route in which an intramo-
lecular, diastereoselective phenol para-alkylation5 would
generate the requisite bicyle incorporating the cyclohexadi-
enone chromophore. In this approach the stereogenic center
C-11 (Figure 2, resiniferatoxin numbering) would be set by
Unlike the reported uses of this elegant chemistry in which
the nitrile is excised to give a methine stereocenter, however,
we aimed to retain the quaternary stereocenter and transform
the nitrile into an aldehyde. The synthesis of 9 commenced
with commercially available (S)-3-hydroxy butyric acid ethyl
ester (3) (Scheme 1). The hydroxyl butyrate was protected
Scheme 1
as its trimethylsilyl ether, and the resulting ester was reduced
to the aldehyde (DIBALH). Subsequent cyanide-catalyzed
trimethylsilyl cyanide addition to the aldehyde followed by
ketal formation afforded the two diastereomeric acetonides
4 and 5 in 75% combined yield over four steps. Alkylation
of the derived nitrile enolate with benzyl chloromethyl ether
(BOMCl) afforded the desired ether 6 in 60% yield as a
Figure 2. Retrosynthetic analysis for the formation of the
cyclohexadienone via diastereoselective Winstein alkylation.
1
single diastereomer as assayed by analysis of the H NMR
appropriate selection of the starting material 2 and trans
formed to the product through an invertive displacement. By
contrast, the configuration at the quaternary center necessarily
needs to be controlled in the alkylation reaction. Our previous
study provided little guidance in this respect, because the
bicyclic intermediate dictated the facial selectivity in the
intramolecular alkylation. A stereoselective phenol para-
alkylation in an unconstrained acyclic intermediate has not
been previously addressed, and thus we became interested
in investigating the stereochemical consequences of this
critical step.
spectrum. The reaction sequence (3 f 6) could conveniently
be accomplished on a 100-g scale. Further functionalization
of the benzyl-protected primary alcohol ultimately required
cleavage of the benzyl ether. We found this deprotection step
to be problematic under reductive conditions (Na/NH3, H2/
Pd) at this as well as at later stages in the synthesis. However,
7
selective C-H oxidation using RuO4/NaIO4 transformed the
benzyl ether to the corresponding benzoate 7. Reduction of
this benzoate with DIBALH and protection of the resulting
alcohol as its tert-butyldimethylsilyl ether afforded nitrile 8
in 88% yield. Nitrile reduction to aldehyde 9 using DIBALH,
a common reducing agent for this transformation,8 afforded
the product in only 30-40% yield. However, using the alum-
inate complex formed from n-BuLi and DIBALH,9 the de-
sired aldehyde could be isolated in 94% yield.
The synthesis of the requisite coupling partner for 9, cin-
namyl bromide 10, was pursued next (Scheme 2). The syn-
thesis started with regioselective acetylation of inexpensive
3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde (11) to afford the mono 3-acyl
ester along with its 4-acyl regioisomer as a 9:1 mixture in
66% yield after recrystallization. Protection of the residual
phenol group as its methanesulfonic acid ester yielded ben-
zaldehyde 12. Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons reaction with
In selecting a viable route to the C-8-C-11 fragment (2,
Figure 2), we decided to employ the method developed by
Rychnovsky for the synthesis of protected 1,3-diol units.6
(2) Phorbol: (a) Wender, P. A.; Lee, H. Y.; Wilhelm, R. S.; Williams,
P. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8954. (b) Wender, P. A.; Kogen, H.;
Lee, H. Y.; Munger, J. D.; Wilhelm, R. S.; Williams, P. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1989, 111, 8957. (c) Wender, P. A.; Rice, K. D.; Schnute, M. E. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7897. (d) Lee, K.; Cha, J. K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 5590. Resiniferatoxin: Wender, P. A.; Jesudason, C. D.;
Nakahira, H.; Tamura, N.; Tebbe, A. L.; Ueno, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 12976.
(3) Jackson, S. R.; Johnson, M. G.; Mikami, M.; Shiokawa, S.; Carreira,
E. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2694.
(4) For the closely related photorearrangement of R-santonin, see: (a)
Barton, D. H. R.; DeMayo, P.; Shafiq, M. J. Chem. Soc. 1957, 929; J.
Chem. Soc. 1958, 141; J. Chem. Soc. 1958, 3314; Proc. Chem. Soc. 1957,
205. (b) Arigoni, D.; Bosshard, H.; Bruderer, H.; Bu¨chi, G.; Jeger, O.;
Krebaum, L. J. HelV. Chim. Acta 1957, 40, 1732.
(5) Winstein, S.; Baird, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 756.
(6) (a) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Zeller, S.; Skalitzky D. J.; Griesgraber, G. J.
Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5550. (b) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Griesgraber, G. J. Org.
Chem. 1992, 57, 1559. (c) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Powers, J. P.; LePage, T. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8375.
(7) (a) Djerassi, C.; Engle, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75, 3838. (b)
Carlsen, P. H. J.; Katsuki, T.; Martin, V. S.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem.
1981, 46, 3936.
(8) Smith, M. B.; March, J. March’s AdVanced Organic Chemistry, 5th
ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2001; p 1204.
(9) Sunggak, K.; Ahn, K. H. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 1717.
4372
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 23, 2004