2146
X. Arnés et al.
LETTER
(13) Compound 3: A 0.175 M suspension of 1.3 mol of KH 30%
in dry Et2O was added dropwise to a 0.085 M solution of 2
(1 mol) in dry Et2O at 0 ºC, and the resulting mixture was
allowed to stir for 30 min until complete formation of the
alcoholate. The mixture was cooled to –78 ºC and a 0.43 M
solution of iodine (3 mol) in Et2O was then added. The
reaction was allowed to stir at low temperature for 1 h. A
solution of Na2S3O3 was then added and the reaction product
extracted with Et2O. The combination of the etheral layers
was concentrated and the residue purified by radial
3.91 (m, 1 H, H-5), 3.83 (dd, 1 H, J54 = 7.6 Hz, J34 = 3.4 Hz,
H-4), 3.71 (dd, 1 H, J23 = 9.6 Hz, J43 = 3.4 Hz, H-3), 3.67 (m,
2 H, H-6), 2.85 (bs, 1 H, OH). 13C NMR (100.6 MHz,
CDCl3): d = 138.1, 137.8, 135.5, 134.4 (C, aromatics),
129.8–126.5 (CH, aromatics, C-1, C-2), 80.9 (C-3), 77.1 (C-
4), 74.1, 73.3 (CH2Ph), 71.0, 70.8, 70.5 (C-5, C-6, CH2Ph).
(17) Freeman, F.; Robarge, K. D. Carbohydr. Res. 1986, 154,
270.
(18) Compound 6: To a 0.5 M solution of 5 (0.084 g, 0.16 mmol)
(E/Z = 2:3) in CH3CN, NaHCO3 (0.48 mmol) was added.
The mixture was cooled to 0 ºC and left to stir at this
temperature for 5 min. NIS (0.48 mol) was then added and
the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to r.t. and stirred
for 8 h. The mixture was diluted with Et2O and washed with
a sat. solution of Na2S3O3. The combined aqueous layer was
extracted with Et2O. The combination of ethereal layers was
dried with MgSO4 and concentrated. The residue was
purified by radial chromatography to afford 0.060 g (58%
yield) as a b/a mixture = 2:3. Compound 6b: [a]D25 +16.0 (c
0.7708, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.70–
7.20 (m, 20 H, aromatics), 5.11 (d, 1 H, J2,1 = 10.6 Hz, H-1),
4.92 (d, 1 H, J = 10.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.75 (d, 1 H, J = 10.4 Hz,
CH2Ph), 4.62 (d, 1 H, J = 11.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.60 (d, 1 H,
J = 12.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.52 (d, 1 H, J = 11.4 Hz, CH2Ph),
4.51 (d, 1 H, J = 12.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.18 (m, 1 H, H-3, H-5),
4.02 (dd, 1 H, J1,2 = 10.4 Hz, J3,2 = 2.4 Hz, H-2), 3.72 (m, 1
H, H-4, H-6a, H-6b). 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): d =
138.4, 138.1, 137.6 (C, aromatics), 133.2 (CH, aromatic),
131.7 (C, aromatic), 128.7–127.4 (CH, aromatics), 84.3
(C-1), 78.7 (C-3), 76.1 (C-4), 75.9 (C-5), 75.7, 73.3, 72.2
(CH2Ph), 69.3 (C-6), 31.8 (C-2). Compound 6a
chromatography to afford 3 (61%) as a yellowish syrup.
Compound 3: [a]D25 +67.8 (c 0.0217, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.70–7.10 (m, 20 H, aromatics), 5.68
(s, 1 H, H-1), 4.88 (d, 1 H, J = 10.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.87 (d, 1
H, J3,2 = 3.6 Hz, H-2), 4.72 (d, 1 H, J = 11.2 Hz, CH2Ph),
4.70 (d, 1 H, J = 11.6 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.54 (d, 1 H, J = 11.2 Hz,
CH2Ph), 4.52 (d, 1 H, J = 10.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.48 (d, 1 H,
J = 11.6 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.41 (ddd, 1 H, J4,5 = 8.8 Hz, J6a,5 = 4.4
Hz, J6b,5 = 1.6 Hz, H-5), 3.99 (dd, 1 H, J5,4 = 8.8 Hz,
J
3,4 = 8.4 Hz, H-4), 3.85 (dd, 1 H, J6b,6a = 10.8 Hz, J5,6a = 4.4
Hz, H-6a), 3.73 (dd, 1 H, J6a,6b = 10.8 Hz, J5,6b = 1.6 Hz, H-
6b), 3.10 (dd, 1 H, J4,3 = 8.4 Hz, J2,3 = 3.6 Hz, H-3). 13
C
NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): d = 138.0, 137.2, 133.9 (C,
aromatics), 132.0–127.4 (CH, aromatics), 89.6 (C-1), 77.5
(C-3), 76.2 (C-4), 75.3 (CH2Ph), 73.3 (CH2Ph, C-5), 71.0
(CH2Ph), 68.7 (C-6), 34.8 (C-2).
(14) (a) Landais, Y.; Panchenault, D. Synlett 1995, 1191.
(b) Bravo, F.; Castillón, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 507.
(15) Suzuki, K.; Mukaiyama, T. Chem. Lett. 1982, 1525.
(16) Compound 5: To a solution of 4 mmol of the phosphine
oxide in 26 mL of THF at –78 ºC, 4.2 mmol of BuLi were
added. The mixture was left to stir at low temperature for 30
min. A solution of 1 mmol of the 4 in 2 mL of THF was then
added dropwise. The mixture was allowed to warm to r.t.
first and then heated to reflux. A sat. solution of NH4Cl was
then added and the olefination product extrated with Et2O.
The combination of ethereal layers was dried with MgSO4
and concentrated. The reaction crude was purified by MPLC
(hexane to EtOAc/hexane = 1:3) to render 5 (72% yield) as
a mixture of diastereoisomers (E/Z-ratio = 80:20) as a syrup.
Compound 5E: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.39–7.25
(m, 20 H, aromatics), 6.54 (d, 1 H, J2,1 = 15.1 Hz, H-1), 5.94
(dd, 1 H, J1,2 = 15.1 Hz, J3,2 = 8.4 Hz, H-2), 4.75 (d, 1 H,
J = 10.8 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.67 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz, CH2Ph),
4.56 (d, 1 H, J = 10.8 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.51 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz,
CH2Ph), 4.48 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.40 (d, 1 H,
J = 12.0 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.22 (dd, 1 H, J2,3 = 8.4 Hz, J4,3 = 4.4
Hz, H-3), 3.82 (m, 1 H, H-5), 3.69 (dd, 1 H, J5,4 = 7.6 Hz,
J3,4 = 4.4 Hz, H-4), 3.61 (m, 2 H, H-6), 2.78 (bs, 1 H, OH).
13C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): d = 138.2, 138.1, 137.8,
134.6 (C, aromatics), 129.1–126.9 (CH, aromatics), 128.8
(C-1), 128.4 (C-2), 81.3 (C-3), 80.8 (C-4), 74.2, 73.4
(CH2Ph), 70.9 (C-6), 70.8 (C-5), 70.5 (CH2Ph). Compound
5Z: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.39–7.25 (m, 20 H,
aromatics), 6.62 (d, 1 H, J21 = 9.6 Hz, H-1), 6.00 (pseudo t,
1 H, J12 = J32 = 9.6 Hz, H-2), 4.89–4.35 (m, 6 H, CH2Ph),
(spectroscopical data extracted from the a/b-mixture
spectrum): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.70–7.20 (m,
20 H, aromatics), 5.32 (d, 1 H, J2,1 = 5.4 Hz, H-1), 4.91 (d, 1
H, J = 11.6 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.79 (d, 1 H, J = 10.8 Hz, CH2Ph),
4.68 (ddd, 1 H, J4,5 = 10.0 Hz, J6a,5 = 2.8 Hz, J6b,5 = 2.4 Hz,
H-5), 4.57 (dd, J1,2 = 5.6 Hz, J3,2 = 2.4 Hz, H-2), 4.52 (d, 2
H, J = 10.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.42 (d, 1 H, J = 11.2 Hz, CH2Ph),
4.40 (d, 1 H, J = 12.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.09 (dd, 1 H, J2,3 = 2.4
Hz, J4,3 = 2.4 Hz, H-3), 3.77 (m, 2 H, H-4, H-6a), 3.62 (dd, 1
H, J6a,6b = 10.8 Hz, J5,6b = 2.4 Hz, H-6b). 13C NMR (100.6
MHz, CDCl3): d = 131.4–126.8 (C, CH, aromatics), 90.0 (C-
1), 78.1, 76.3, 75.6, 73.5, 72.0, 68.8, 67.7 (C-3, C-4, C-5, C-
6, 3 × CH2Ph), 27.0 (C-2).
(19) General Procedure of Glycosylation: A solution of the
glycosyl donor (1 mmol) and the glycosyl acceptor (2 mmol)
in CH2Cl2 (4 mL) were allowed to stir with 4 Å molecular
sieves for 2 h. The mixture was then cooled to –78 ºC, and
NIS (3 mmol) and TfOH (0.2 mmol) were added. The
mixture was allowed to warm to –40 ºC and stirred for 2–4
h. The reaction mixture was then diluted with CH2Cl2 and
washed with a solution of Na2S3O3. The ethereal layer was
dried with Na2SO4 and concentrated. The residue was then
purified by radial chromatography.
(20) Veeneman, G. H.; van Leeuwen, S. H.; van Boom, J. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 1331.
Synlett 2003, No. 14, 2143–2146 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York