noted above (cf. Table 1, entry 2). At longer reaction times, the
homodimer 1b is slowly converted into the cross-product 26.
of benzylamine toward oxidation by TBHBQ (see above),
however, causes the equilibrium mixture to be driven
toward formation of the heterocoupled product 19.
Similar considerations rationalize the reactivity ob-
served with benzylamine and aniline in Figure 1B. Exclu-
sive formation of homodimer 1b early in the reaction is
readily explained by the higher reactivity of benzylamine
relative to aniline with imine-hydroquinone intermediate 15.
Formation of N-benzylidene aniline 26 at longer reaction
times is relatively sluggish. Formation of 26 via condensa-
tion of aniline with 1b is thermodynamically unfavorable
(Keq , 1; eq 3). Nevertheless, its formation can be driven by
continuous oxidation of the benzylamine generated, albeit
in small quantities, from this exchange reaction.
Figure 1. A 1H NMR time course of the TBHBQ-catalyzed
oxidation of (A) benzylamine and methylbenzylamine and (B)
benzylamine and aniline. Reaction conditions: benzylamine
(0.28 M), R-methylbenzlamine or aniline (0.57 M), TBHBQ
(0.014 M), trimethoxybenzene (internal standard, 0.078 M),
MeCN-d3, O2 balloon, rt.
The ability of a dynamic equilibrium mixture of species
to converge toward a single product by consumption of
one of the species has been termed “self-sorting.”12 With
the pair of substrates shown in Figure 1A, oxidatively
promoted self-sorting overcomes the slight thermody-
namic preference of 1b over 19, enabling exclusive forma-
tion of 19. With the substrate pair in Figure 1B, the
kinetically preferred product may be obtained in good
yield at short reaction times, or oxidative self-sorting can
be exploited to obtain the otherwise strongly disfavored
product. This oxidative strategy to achieve imine self-
sorting is complementary to other approaches being pur-
sued in the field of dynamic covalent chemistry13À15 (e.g.,
through the use of templates) to promote selective product
formation within an equilibrating mixture.
In summary, we have identified a highly chemoselective
method for the aerobic oxidative coupling of primary
benzylic amines to afford secondary imines, and dynamic
self-sorting of the imine products enables selective forma-
tion of heterocoupled imines. The mild reaction condi-
tions, the functional group compatibility, the use of O2 as
the oxidant, and the low catalyst loadings compare favor-
ably with previously reported metal-catalyzed methods.
The cross-coupling results depicted in Figure 1 can be
rationalized by three considerations: (1) the relative nucleo-
philicity of the two amines with the catalytic intermediate
15, (2) equilibrium exchange of the amine substrates with
the secondary imine products, and (3) the relative reactivity
of the amine substrates toward oxidation.
The parallel formation of 1b and 19 in Figure 1A
suggests that benzylamine and R-methylbenzylamine can
react with catalytic intermediate 15 to afford the homo-
and heterocoupled dimers, respectively. Control experi-
ments show that 1b and 19 equilibrate readily under the
reaction conditions in the presence of the amine substrates
(eq 2), and the equilbrium constant (Keq ≈ 0.7) shows a
slight preference for 1b. The substantially higher reactivity
(12) Belowich, M. E.; Stoddart, J. F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2003–
2024.
(13) For reviews, see: (a) Corbett, P. T.; Leclaire, J.; Vial, L.; West,
K. R.; Wietor, J.-L.; Sanders, J. K. M.; Otto, S. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106,
3652–3711. (b) Lehn, J.-M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 151–160.
(c) Ludlow, R. F.; Otto, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 101–108.
(14) For selected recent applications of dynamic covalent chemistry,
pertaining to the exchange of CdN bonds, see: (a) Dirksen, A.; Dirksen,
S.; Hackeng, T. M.; Dawson, P. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15602–
15603. (b) Dirksen, A.; Hackeng, T. M.; Dawson, P. E. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7581–7584. (c) Hartley, C. S.; Moore, J. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11682–11683.
Acknowledgment. We thank the U.S. Department of
Energy (DE-FG02-05ER15690) for financial support of
this work. Analytical instrumentation was partially funded
by the NSF (CHE-9208463, CHE-0342998, CHE-9629688,
CHE-9974839).
(15) For representative fundamental studies of equilibrium-
controlled exchange of other covalent bonds, such as esters, alkenes, and
amides, see: (a) Stanton, M. G.; Allen, C. B.; Kissling, R. M.; Lincoln,
ꢀ
A. L.; Gagne, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5981–5989.
ꢀ
(b) Kissling, R. M.; Gagne, M. R. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4209–4212. (c) Nyce,
G. W.; Lamboy, J. A.; Connor, E. F.; Waymouth, R. M.; Hedrick, J. L.
Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3587–3590. (d) Eldred, S. E.; Stone, D. A.; Gellman,
S. H.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3422–3423. (e) Singh, R.;
Kissling, R. M.; Letellier, M.-A.; Nolan, S. P. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
209–212. (f) Cantrill, S. J.; Grubbs, R. H.; Lanari, D.; Leung, K. C.-F.;
Nelson, A.; Poulin-Kerstien, K. G.; Smidt, S. P.; Stoddart, J. F.; Tirrell,
D. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4213–4216. (g) Stephenson, N. A.; Zhu, J.;
Gellman, S. H.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10003–10008.
Supporting Information Available. Experimental pro-
1
cedures, product characterization data, and H and 13C
NMR spectra. This material is available free of charge via
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
D
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX