C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
This materials system, combined with roll cast processing,
provides advantages over other techniques for achieving polarized
photoluminescence. Many of the systems and processes reported
to date are not readily amenable to large-scale production.1 In
addition, the emission efficiencies of these systems are often limited
by aggregation phenomena found in highly aligned parallel chains
of conjugated polymer.1 In contrast, we have demonstrated the
ability to process large-area, uniform films that produce polarized
photoluminescence. Furthermore, the grafted PPE, used as the
optically active material, intrinsically eliminates aggregation, and
thus, the aligned films have enhanced emission efficiency in the
solid state.
Figure 1. GPC elugrams of (a) PPE Backbone, (b) PS grafted PPE, and
(c) cleaved PS grafts and 1H NMR of polymers 3, 4, and 5. 1H NMR
normalized on the aromatic methoxy proton signal.
In summary, we have demonstrated that polarized photolumi-
nescence can be obtained from a roll cast CP-block copolymer
guest/host system. Synthetic modification of an optically active PPE
guest was conducted for domain-specific doping of a block
copolymer host. Globally orienting the nanostructure of the host
provided a template for the alignment of the guest PPE. The host/
guest system gives rise to both polarized absorption and photolu-
minescence parallel to the cylinder axis of the host, indicative of
uniaxially oriented PPEs. Our group is currently studying the effects
of grafting length and film thickness on the alignment and
subsequent polarized emission of the templated guest PPEs.
Templating of PPEs in a block copolymer photonic crystal is also
being pursued.
Figure 2. Polarized absorption (a) and photoluminescence (b) of a roll
cast oriented film of 0.1 wt % PPE-g-PS doped in SIS. The spectra were
obtained with polarizers oriented parallel (solid line) and perpendicular
(dashed line) to the average PS cylinder orientation of the block copolymer
host. It should be noted that the emission spectra in (b), measured
perpendicular to the polarizers (dashed line), is corrected for instrumental
polarization dependence. See Supporting Information for details.
Acknowledgment. This research was supported by the U.S.
Army through the Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies, under
Contract DAAD-19-02-D-0002 with the U.S. Army Research
Office. The content does not necessarily reflect the position of the
Government, and no official endorsement should be inferred.
PS dopant was blended in at a concentration of 0.1 wt % of polymer.
After roll casting, the resultant films were approximately 0.04 mm
thick and 6 × 16 cm2 in area. The polystyrene cylinders were
oriented in the plane of the film, and hence, the films displayed
the expected mechanical anisotropy9 due to the oriented glassy
polystyrene cylinders in an elastic polyisoprene matrix. The film
nanostructure was characterized by transmission electron micros-
copy (TEM).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
synthetic preparations for all new compounds, and roll cast film
characterization (PDF). This material is available free of charge via
References
Photophysical characterization of the globally oriented roll cast
films was conducted. Figure 2 shows the polarized absorption and
photoluminescence observed from a doped roll cast film. The
measured absorbance dichroic ratio as shown in Figure 2a is 3.0 at
440 nm. The polarized emission in 2b was generated by exciting
the roll cast film with 400 nm radiation normal to the plane of the
film, yielding a polarization ratio of 6.4 at 472 nm. These values
indicate that the transition dipoles of the guest PPE-g-PS are
aligned parallel to the cylinder axis of the block copolymer host
and thus emit polarized light with polarization parallel to the plane
of the film. Furthermore, the difference in the absorbance dichroic
ratio as compared to the emission polarization ratio suggests this
particular materials system is able to absorb a significant fraction
of unpolarized light and funnel the excitation into polarized
emission. This phenomenon can be explained by intramolecular
energy transfer from less aligned segments of conjugated polymer
to the highly aligned, and therefore more conjugated, segments of
conjugated polymer within the host cylinder domains. This rationale
is supported by the fact that as the excitation wavelength is increased
to 440 nm, i.e. toward the band edge, the observed polarization
ratio increases to 7.3 at 472 nm.14 The lower-energy excitation
directly excites the more aligned, longer-conjugation length seg-
ments.
(1) Grell, M.; Bradley, D. D. C. AdV. Mater. 1999, 11, 895.
(2) (a) Weder, C.; Sarwa, C.; Mantali, A.; Bastiaansen, C.; Smith, P. Science
1998, 279, 835. (b) Mantali, A.; Bastiaansen, C.; Smith, P.; Weder, C.
Nature 1998, 392, 261.
(3) Granstrom, M. Polym. AdV. Technol. 1997, 8, 424.
(4) (a) Hagler, T. W.; Pakbaz, K.; Voss, K. F.; Heeger, A. J. Phys. ReV. B
1991, 44, 8652. (b) Yang, C. Y.; Heeger, A. J.; Cao, Y. Polymer 1999,
41, 4113.
(5) Arias, E.; Maillou, T.; Moggio, I.; Guillon, D.; Le Moigne, J.; Geffroy,
B. Synth. Met. 2002, 127, 229.
(6) (a) Hamaguchi, M.; Yoshino, K. Polym. AdV. Technol. 1997, 8, 399. (b)
Jandke, M.; Strohriegl, P.; Gmeiner, J.; Brutting, W.; Schwoerer, M. AdV.
Mater. 1999, 11, 1518. (c) Bolognesi, A.; Botta, C.; Martinelli, M. Synth.
Met. 2001, 121, 1279.
(7) (a) Wittmann, J. C.; Smith, P. Nature 1991, 352, 414. (b) Yoshida, Y.;
Tanigaki, N.; Yase, K.; Hotta, S. AdV. Mater. 2000, 12, 1587.
(8) Cimrova, V.; Remmers, M.; Neher, D.; Wegner, G. AdV. Mater. 1996, 8,
146.
(9) Thomas, E. L.; Lescanec, R. L. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
1994, 348, 149.
(10) Folkes, M. J.; Keller, A. Polymer 1971, 12, 222.
(11) Winter, H. H.; Scott, D. B.; Gronski, W.; Okamoto, S.; Hashimoto, T.
Macromolecules 1993, 26, 7236.
(12) Albalak, R. J.; Thomas, E. L. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 1994, 32,
341.
(13) (a) Borner, H. G.; Beers, K.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Sheiko, S. S.; Moller,
M. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 4375. (b) Costanzo, P. J.; Stokes, K. K.
Macromolecules 2002, 35, 6804.
(14) Rose, A.; Lugmair, C. G.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
11298.
JA036024Y
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 33, 2003 9943