Y.A. Rodikova et al.
AppliedCatalysisA,General549(2018)216–224
2. Experimental
To obtain the reduced HPAs without pollution with extraneous
compounds, prepared solutions in 35–40 mL volume were placed into
temperature-controlled reactor and quantitatively reduced with a 10 M
aqueous solution of hydrazine hydrate N2H4·H2O at 70 °C until nitrogen
evolution ceased. The necessary amount of hydrazine hydrate was
calculated from Eq. (5) subject to total vanadium(V) content. The vo-
lume of nitrogen evolved was determined by a burette. In all experi-
ments, the amount of nitrogen corresponded to the amount of N2H4
added with an accuracy of 1%.
2.1. Chemicals
For synthesis of HPA solutions, 85 wt.% H3PO4 (99.4%), V2O5
(99%), MoO3 (99%), and 30 wt.% H2O2 (special purity) all supplied by
Sibreakhim (Novosibirsk) were used. 2,3-Me2P (99%) was purchased
from Aldrich. 2,3,5,6-Tetramethyl-p-benzoquinone (DQ) was from
Merck-Schuchardt (99.9%) and was used as an internal standard in GC
analysis. All organic solvents (∼99%) were obtained from Sibreakhim
and used as received.
4VO+2 + N2H4 + 4H+ → 4VO2+ + 4H2 O+ N2
(5)
The concentration of vanadium(IV) (VIV) in fresh and regenerated
HPA solutions was determined by potentiometric titration with 0.1 N
KMnO4 in the presence of H3PO4 [47]. The average reduction degree of
the solutions (mred) was calculated according to Eq. (6), where ‘[HPA]’
is the initial concentration of HPA solution.
2.2. Catalyst synthesis
The modified-type aqueous HPA-x’ solutions of compositions
H13P3Mo15V6O74 (HPA-6′), H10P3Mo18V7O84 (HPA-7′), H11P3Mo18V8O87
(HPA-8′), and H17P3Mo16V10O89 (HPA-10′) were prepared by the method
of Odyakov et al. [45]. According to the method, vanadium(V) oxide,
V2O5, was dissolved in cold distilled water, and a cold diluted H2O2 so-
lution was added to the slurry at stirring. Upon gradual heating to room
temperature, the resulting dark-red mixture of peroxo-vanadium com-
pounds spontaneously decomposed with O2 evolving, forming a dark-or-
ange solution of decavanadic acid H6V10O28. The obtained H6V10O28 so-
lution was stabilized by adding diluted H3PO4 solution with forming
H9PV14O42, as detailed in Eqs. (1) and (2).
[VIV
x×[HPA]
]
[VIV
]
mred
=
=
[VIV] + [VV]
(6)
To estimate the thermostability of solutions prepared (the tem-
perature of solution decomposition, Td), the sample of solution (50 mL)
was heated in a thermostatic stainless steel autoclave to 130 °C under
vigorous stirring. After keeping at this temperature for 1 h, the solution
was cooled and filtered. In the absence of precipitation, heating was
repeated with increasing temperature by 5 °C.
In the next step, the prepared H9PV14O42 solution was gradually
introduced into boiling aqueous suspension of MoO3 and H3PO4 under
vigorous stirring (Eq. (3)). The resulting solution after the total
H9PV14O42 addition and complete MoO3 dissolution was evaporated to
required volume, giving homogeneous HPA-x’ solution with a specified
composition. The volume of prepared HPA solutions ranged within
0.25–+0H.3O2 L.
2.4. Catalyst testing
Oxidation of 2,3-Me2P was carried out in a jacketed glass reactor
under vigorous stirring (900 rpm) with a magnetic stir bar in a two-
phase system composed of an aqueous HPA solution and an organic
solvent with a dissolved substrate. In a typical experiment, the substrate
(0.033 ÷ 0.15 g) was dissolved in an organic solvent (OS), and the
resulting solution was introduced (entirely or dropwise) into reactor
with a certain amount of HPA solution. The experiments were per-
formed at different temperatures (25–50 °C) and molar ratio of vana-
dium(V) to substrate ([nVV]/[Su]) in the range of 4–21. The reactor was
equipped with a reflux condenser to avoid the loss of water and organic
solvent during the experiments. For studies under inert atmosphere, air
was substituted by N2 or CO2, and a slow stream of inert gas was kept at
the reactor inlet. In the course of reaction, a small volume of the re-
action solution was periodically sampled, and then the conversion of
2,3-Me2P and the yields (η) (or selectivities (S)) of products were de-
termined by GC analysis. After the reaction was completed, the organic
phase was separated from the catalyst solution in a separating funnel.
The product traces were additionally removed from the aqueous phase
by chloroform extraction (5 mL). Organic phase was washed twice with
water to ensure the total catalyst separation. In some cases the content
of catalyst components (Mo, V, P) in organic solution after catalyst
removing was determined by ICP AES method using a Perkin Elmer
Optima 4300 DV spectrometer. Their amount was within
10−8–10−10 mol L−1. The products were confirmed by comparison of
their GC retention times, GC–MS patterns, and/or infrared spectra with
those of the authentic samples.
2
2
V O5 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯→ VO(O2)+ + VO(O2)− ⎯⎯⎯→ H6V O28
2
10
2
(1)
(2)
−O
2
1.4H6V O28 + H3PO4 ⎯⎯→⎯ H9PV O42 + 1.2H2O
10
14
⟵
H3PO4 +
′
′
x
x
⎛
⎜
⎞
⎟
⎛
⎝
⎞
⎠
⎛
⎝
⎞
⎠
yMoO3 +
z−
H9PV O42 + cH2 O→ HaP MoyV Ob
14
z
x′
14
14
⎝
⎠
(3)
To compare the catalytic activity, the low-vanadium Keggin-type
aqueous solutions of H5PMo10V2O40 (HPA-2) and H7PMo8V4O40 (HPA-
4) were also synthesized by a similar technique according to Eq. (4) in
the volumes of 0.25 L [46].
(12−x)MoO3 + 0.5xV O5 + H3PO4 + 0.5xH2 O→ H3+xPMo12−xV O40
2
x
(4)
2.3. Catalyst characterization
The composition of freshly prepared and spent solutions was in-
vestigated by 31P and 51V NMR spectroscopy on a Bruker AVANCE 400
high-resolution NMR spectrometer at 162.0 and 105.24 MHz, respec-
tively, with 85% H3PO4 and VOCl3 as external standards.
Redox potentials (E) and pH values of the aqueous HPA solutions
were measured at room temperature using a pH-meter inoLab pH 730
(WTW, Germany). For pH registering, a combined pH-electrode ‘SenTix
41’ with an embedded temperature detector was used. The pH electrode
was calibrated in the usual manner using buffers with a pH of 1.09
(Hamilton) and 4.01 (WTW). To measure the E values, a combined
platinum electrode ‘SenTix ORP’ with a ceramic diaphragm was ap-
plied. The values of E are given in volts (V) relative to the Normal
Hydrogen Electrode (NHE). Potential constancy of HPA solutions was
2.5. Catalyst regeneration
After the experiments, the spent HPA solution was placed into a
thermostatic stainless steel autoclave equipped with a glass beaker-in-
sert. The Keggin-type HPA-4 solution was regenerated at the tempera-
ture of 140 °C and an oxygen pressure of 2–4 atm stirring for 35–40 min
[48]. The reduced modified-type HPA-x’ solutions and Keggin-type
HPA-2 solution were oxidized at 170 °C for 20 min at the same oxygen
pressure as for HPA-4. The regenerated HPA solutions were used for
repeated synthesis of 2,3-Me2BQ.
attained in 3–4 min with an accuracy of
achieved in 4–5 min accurate within
0.005 V; pH constancy was
0.01 pH units.
218