the alkaloid and can be extended to the securinine-type
subgroup.
Scheme 1
The securinega alkaloids have been associated with a
number of biological activities, some of which are well
documented. Securinine (1) is a stimulant of the central
nervous system5 and has shown antimalarial and antibacterial
activities.6 Several securinega alkaloids act also as antitumor
agents.7 Despite their attractive potential as pharmacological
agents, published synthetic investigations related to these
alkaloids are quite limited. Racemic securinine was synthe-
sized by Horii et al. a few years after its isolation,8a and
much more recently, two additional total syntheses8b,c and
one formal synthesis8d were reported. Very recently, two
rather similar stereoselective syntheses of 1 have been
described by the Honda group and by our group.9 Both
sequences start from (R)-pipecolinic acid, which determines
the configuration of C2 in 1. When we performed an
analogous sequence starting from (S)-proline, we ended up
with (-)-allonorsecurinine (4), a previously unknown epimer
at C2 of (-)-norsecurinine (3). The same starting material
was used by Heathcock et al. in the first reported successful
synthesis of (()-310 and by Jacobi and co-workers in the
first preparation of (-)-3.11 The groups of Magnus and
Weinreb have described alternative successful approaches
to (()-3 and to (-)-3, respectively.6a,12
metathesis (RCM) reaction, which would furnish the seven-
membered cycle embracing rings B and C. The stereogenic
center of 7 should afford the configuration at C7 in the
alkaloid, while the diastereoselectivity of its addition to 8
would determine the relative configuration at C2. Therefore,
the main concerns of our investigations were as follows:
preparing a suitable precursor of 7 in enantiopure form and
getting good steric control in the vinylogous Mannich
reaction.
Recently, Trost et al. described the conversion of racemic
butadiene monoepoxide (10) into a single enantiomeric
product through a palladium-catalyzed asymmetric allylic
alkylation of phthalimide in the presence of some chiral
phosphine ligands.13 Inspired by this work, we investigated
the reaction between succinimide (9) and epoxide 10 under
similar conditions (Scheme 2), and after extensive experi-
mentation, we isolated the alkylated product 11 in 91% yield
and 87% ee. We tentatively assigned the R configuration to
the major enantiomer, by analogy to the phthalimide analogue
obtained in the presence of the same ligand. Alcohol 11 was
converted into the corresponding tert-butyldiphenylsilyl
(TBDPS) ether 12, which upon crystallization in 2-propanol
afforded a highly enantiomerically enriched material (>98%
ee) in 81% yield from 9. Reduction of 12 with lithium
triethylborohydride furnished a mixture of the epimeric
aminals 13 in 87% yield. Triisopropylsilyloxyfuran 8 was
prepared in 97% yield from 4-vinyl-2(5H)-furanone.14 Then,
the crucial vinylogous Mannich reaction15 was investigated,
and we found that the reaction was best accomplished with
1.2 equiv of 8, in ether at 0 °C, in the presence of BF3‚
Et2O. Under these conditions, 1H NMR analysis of the crude
reaction material evidenced the full conversion of 13 and
the formation of a clean mixture of diastereomeric products
14. All attempts to separate these isomers by chromatography
led to complex mixtures of decomposition products, but on
standing at room temperature overnight, the major isomer
14a crystallized and could be separated from the mixture
by filtration in 51% yield.
During the past few years, we have been trying to develop
new, general strategies for the synthesis of both types of
securinega alkaloids. Scheme 1 shows the retrosynthetic
analysis for one of the investigated approaches, where key
steps are a vinylogous Mannich reaction between an iminium
cation 7 and a silyloxyfuran 8, which would, respectively,
provide rings A and D of the alkaloid and a ring-closing
(3) Isolation: (a) Murev’eva, V. I.; Ban’kovskii, A. I.; Dokl. Akad. Nauk
SSSR 1956, 110, 998-1000. Structural assignment: (b) Satoda, I.; Mu-
rayama, M.; Tsuji, Y.; Yoshii, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1962, 1199-1206. (c)
Saito, S.; Kotera, K.; Shigematsu, N.; Ide, A.; Sugimoto, N.; Horii, Z.;
Hanaoka, M.; Yamawaki, Y.; Tamura, Y. Tetrahedron 1963, 19, 2085-
2099. (d) Horii, Z.; Ikeda, M.; Yamawaki, Y.; Tamura, Y.; Saito, S.; Kodera,
K. Tetrahedron 1963, 19, 2101-2110. Absolute configuration: (e) Imado,
S.; Shiro, M.; Horii, Z.; Chem. Ind. (London) 1964, 1691.
(4) Isolation and structural assignment of (-)-norsecurinine: (a) Iketu-
bosin, G. O.; Mathieson, D. W. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1963, 15, 810-815.
Absolute configuration: (b) Saito, S.; Tanaka, T.; Kotera, K.; Nakai, H.;
Sugimoto, N.; Horii, Z.; Ikeda, M.; Tamura, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1965,
13, 786-796. Isolation of (+)-norsecurinine: (c) Rouffiac, R.; Parello, J.
Plant. Med. Phytother. 1969, 3, 220-223.
(5) Beutler, J. A.; Karbon, E. W.; Brubaker, A. N.; Malik, R.; Curtis, D.
R.; Enna, S. J. Brain Res. 1985, 330, 135-140.
(6) See references in: (a) Han, G.; LaPorte, M. C.; Folmer, J. J.; Werner,
K. M.; Weinreb, S. M. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6293-6306. (b) Kammler,
R.; Polborn, K.; Wanner, K. Th. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 3359-3368.
(7) Tatematsu, H.; Mori, M.; Yang, T.-H.; Chang, J.-J.; T. Lee, T.-Y.;
Lee, K.-H. J. Pharm. Sci. 1991, 80, 325-327.
(8) (a) Horii, Z.; Hanaoka, M.; Yamawaki, Y.; Tamura, Y.; Saito, S.;
Shigematsu, N.; Kotera, K.; Yoshikawa, H.; Sato, Y.; Nakai, H.; Sugimoto,
N. Tetrahedron 1967, 23, 1165-1174. (b) Xi, F. D.; Liang, X. T. Acta
Pharm. Sin. 1992, 27, 349-352. (c) Liras, S.; Davoren, J. E.; Bordner, J.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 703-706. (d) Honda, T.; Namiki, H.; Kudoh, M.; Nagase,
H.; Mizutani, H. Heterocycles 2003, 59, 169-187.
(9) (a) Honda, T.; Namiki, H.; Kaneda, K.; Mizutani, H. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 87-89. (b) Alibe´s, R.; Ballbe´, M.; Busque´, F.; de March, P.; Elias, L.;
Figueredo, M.; Font, J. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1813-1816.
The relative configuration of 14a-d could be established
by performing a RCM16 experiment with the crude reaction
material containing the mixture of all the isomers. The olefins
(12) Magnus, P.; Rodr´ıguez-Lo´pez, J.; Mulholland, K.; Matthews, I.
Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 8059-8072.
(13) Trost, B. M.; Bunt, R. C.; Lemoine, R. C.; Calkins, T. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5968-5976.
(14) Lattmann, E.; Hoffmann, H. M. R. Synthesis 1996, 155-163.
(15) (a) Morimoto, Y.; Nishida, K.; Hayashi, Y.; Shirahama, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 5773-5776. For a recent review, see: (b)
Martin, S. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 895-904.
(10) Heathcock, C. H.; von Geldern, T. W. Heterocycles 1987, 25, 75-
78. This synthesis rendered racemic 2 due to racemization of an intermediate.
(11) Jacobi, P. A.; Blum, C. A.; DeSimone, R. W.; Udodong, U. E. S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5384-5392. This paper describes the
independent preparation of (+)- and (-)-3, starting from L- and D-proline,
respectively.
5108
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 22, 2005