C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Cu1.5Cu1.5/CuICuI couple is assigned at E°′ ) -1.02 V, and its
CuIICuII/Cu1.5Cu1.5 couple is assigned at E°′ ) -0.42 V.
is known to have an extremely high quantum yield (φ ) 0.67(4))
and a long excited-state lifetime (τ ) 10.9(4) µs) in THF at 298
Chemical oxidation of 3 with 1 equiv of [FeCp2][BPh4] yielded
the red-purple paramagnetic species [{(PPP)Cu}2][BPh4] (4). The
X-band EPR spectrum of 4 at 10 K showed an isotropic S ) 1/2
signal. The complex hyperfine splitting pattern features components
from the two Cu centers and the phosphide bridges (see Supporting
Information). These data, along with a signature low-energy inter-
K,7
corresponding emission measurements for 3 reveal significantly
lower values (φ ) 0.013(3) and τ ) 0.6(3) µs). It seems most likely
that this attenuation in emission is related to a greater degree of
structural reorganization upon MLCT in 3 than in 2.
To summarize, we have shown that synthetic dicopper centers
bridged in the diamond-core structural motif become unusually
redox active, in this case sampling the oxidation states CuICuI,
Cu1.5Cu1.5, and CuIICuII. The auxiliary ligand preserves a geometry
that is midway between square planar and tetrahedral about each
copper center, yet is flexible enough to accommodate pronounced
changes in the Cu‚‚‚Cu distance as a function of ET.
Acknowledgment. We thank the BP MC2 program for financial
support. N.P.M. was supported by an NSF graduate research
fellowship, and E.R. by an NSERC postdoctoral fellowship. Larry
Henling, Ted Betley, Brian Leigh, and Dr. Angelo Di Bilio provided
technical assistance. The Zewail group provided access to a near-
IR spectrometer. Luminescence measurements were acquired at the
Beckman Institute Laser Resource Center.
valence charge-transfer band at 1095 nm (ꢀ ) 2800 M-1 cm-1
,
Figure 2b), suggest that 4 be described as a delocalized mixed-
valence system.11
This electronic structure for 4 was at first surprising to us given
the unusually long Cu‚‚‚Cu distance present in 3, but XRD analysis
revealed that one-electron oxidation of 3 also resulted in a huge
Cu-Cu contraction (Cu‚‚‚Cu ) 2.7694(5) Å in 4, see Figure 1).
This 0.538 Å contraction is accompanied by a dramatic compression
of the average Cu-Pµ-Cu angle from 90.63° in 3 to 75.02° in 4.
While modest distortions of a similar nature are observed upon
one-electron oxidation of 1,4 the Cu2P2 system is unexpectedly
flexible. Despite the structural compression that occurs upon
oxidation, there is complete retention of the pseudotetrahedral Cu
centers and the dimeric topology.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental and character-
ization data; crystallographic data. This material is available free of
Two-electron oxidation of 3 with 2 equiv of [FeCp2][BArF ] (ArF
4
) 3,5-(CF3)2C6H3) yielded [{(PPP)Cu}2][BArF ] (5), a deep blue-
4 2
purple compound with an intense LMCT absorption at 683 nm (ꢀ
) 10 600 M-1 cm-1, Figure 2b). 1H, 13C, 19F, and 31P NMR
resonances were observed for 5, consistent with population of an
S ) 0 ground state at room temperature. 31P{1H} NMR resonances
occur at 266.1 (2P) and 37.3 ppm (4P) in CD2Cl2. The extreme
downfield chemical shift of the bridging phosphide resonance of 5
is likely the result of the large change in bond angles at the bridging
phosphides.12,13
References
(1) (a) Gray, H. B.; Malmstrom, B. G.; Williams, R. J. P. J. Biol. Inorg.
Chem. 2000, 5, 551. (b) Rorabacher, D. B. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 651.
(2) Marcus, R. A.; Sutin, N. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1985, 811, 265.
(3) Azacryptand ligands can overcome the need for large structural reorga-
nization and ligand addition/loss/exchange. See: Nelson J.; McKee, V.;
Morgan, G. G. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 47, 167.
(4) Harkins, S. B.; Peters, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2885.
(5) (a) Williams, P. A.; Blackburn, N. J.; Sanders, D.; Bellamy, H.; Stura, E.
A.; Fee, J. A.; McRee, D. E. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 6, 509. (b) DeBeer
George, S.; Metz, M.; Szilagyi, R. K.; Wang, H.; Cramer, S. P.; Lu, Y.;
Tolman, W. B.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 5757. (c) Gamelin, D. R.; Randall, D. W.; Hay, M. T.;
Houser, R. P.; Mulder, T. C.; Canters, G. W.; de Vries, S.; Tolman, W.
B.; Lu, Y.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5246.
(6) For other examples of dicopper class III mixed-valence species, see: (a)
Houser, R. P.; Young, V. G., Jr.; Tolman, W. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 2101. (b) He, C.; Lippard, S. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 5225.
(7) Harkins, S. B.; Peters, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2030. Our
efforts to further characterize this Cu2N2 system will be reported in due
course.
(8) A dicopper system has been recently described for which CV data indicate
two pseudo-reversible redox events. Uptake of an additional ligand occurs
upon oxidation of the CuICuI to the Cu1.5Cu1.5 state: Jiang, X.; Bollinger,
J. C.; Baik, M.-H.; Lee, D. Chem. Commun. 2005, 1043.
(9) Snyder, B. S.; Patterson, G. S.; Abrahamson, A. J.; Holm, R. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5214.
(10) For example: (a) Sellmann, D.; Binder, H.; Ha¨ussinger, D.; Heinemann,
F. W.; Sutter, J. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 300-302, 829. (b) Huynh, M.
H. V.; El-Samanody, E.-S.; White, P. S.; Meyer, T. J. Inorg. Chem. 1999,
38, 3760.
(11) Robin, M.; Day, P. AdV. Inorg. Radiochem. 1967, 10, 247.
(12) For discussions on bridging phosphide 31P NMR resonances relating to
metal-metal bonding, see: (a) Targos, T. S.; Geoffroy, G. L.; Rheingold,
A. L. Organometallics 1986, 5, 12 and references therein. (b) Cartwright,
S. J.; Dixon, K. R.; Rattray, A. D. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 1120.
(13) For a discussion on the dependence of 31P chemical shifts on bond angle,
see: Garrou, P. E. Chem. ReV. 1981, 81, 229.
Though suitable single crystals of 5 proved elusive, using AgSbF6
instead of [FeCp2][BArF ] afforded the more readily crystallized
4
salt [{(PPP)Cu}2][SbF6]2. Its molecular structure reveals two SbF6
anions per dimeric unit, and it is gratifying to observe that the Cu2P2
diamond core is maintained along with retention of pseudotetra-
hedral geometries at each copper center (Figure 1). Close examina-
tion of the bond parameters reveals a further contraction of the
Cu‚‚‚Cu distance (2.596(2) Å) and further compression of the
average Cu-Pµ-Cu angle (70.71°). Although the onset of a direct
bonding interaction between the two 17-electron centers upon
oxidation cannot be dismissed, it is plausible that the Cu‚‚‚Cu
contraction is a consequence of an optimized bridging angle that
facilitates exchange coupling between the Cu centers.14 Indeed, the
simplest oxidation state description for 5 involves two strongly
antiferromagnetically coupled CuII centers. The prototypical Cu2Cl62-
dianion, whose structure is very similar to that of 5, also features
two CuII centers that are either ferromagnetically or antiferromag-
netically coupled depending on the choice of counterion and the
resulting perturbations in bond angles.14c The structure of 5 is
distinctive because small-molecule CuII ions residing in pseudo-
tetrahedral coordination environments are rare.15 Moreover, few
examples of CuII phosphine complexes are known,16 and only one
previous example has been structurally characterized.16a
(14) For discussions on the effect of bridging angle on coupling between d9
centers in dicopper systems, see: (a) Charlot, M. F.; Jeannin, S.; Jeannin,
Y.; Kahn, O.; Lucrece-Abaul, J.; Martin-Frere, J. Inorg. Chem. 1979, 18,
1675. (b) Crawford, V. H.; Richardson, H. W.; Wasson, J. R.; Hodgson,
D. J.; Hatfield, W. E. Inorg. Chem. 1976, 15, 2107. (c) Hay, P. J.;
Thibeault, J. C.; Hoffmann, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 4884.
(15) For examples, see: (a) Baumann, F.; Livoreil, A.; Kaim, W.; Sauvage,
J.-P. Chem. Commun. 1997, 35. (b) Tolman, W. B. Inorg. Chem. 1991,
30, 4877. (c) Knapp, S.; Keenan, T. P.; Zhang, X.; Fikar, R.; Potenza, J.
A.; Schugar, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3452. (c) Kitajima, N.;
Fujisawa, K.; Moro-oka, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3210 and
references therein.
A ramification of the elasticity of the Cu2P2 core manifests itself
in the luminescence behavior of 3. Excitation into the low-energy
absorptions of 3 (λex ) 500 nm) afforded an emission spectrum
with λmax ) 687 nm. This emission band is much broader and quite
red-shifted compared to that of the amide derivative 2.7 The
reorganizational energy upon excitation, which can be estimated
using the width of an emission band,17 is accordingly higher for 3
(ca. 3250 cm-1) relative to 2 (ca. 2600 cm-1). In addition, while 2
(16) (a) Pilloni, G.; Bandoli, G.; Tisato, F.; Corain, B. Chem. Commun. 1996,
433. (b) Lobana, T. S.; Bhatia, P. K. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1992,
1407. (c) Zelonka, R. A.; Baird, M. C. Chem. Commun. 1971, 780.
(17) See Supporting Information for details.
JA056071L
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 46, 2005 16033