The C-15 thiazol-4-yl-9,10-didehydroepothilone D ana-
logues described herein were designed to evaluate C-15
thiazole replacements of the C-16-C-17 trisubstituted olefin
of 1 and are readily available via modifications to the
Danishefsky total synthesis of 1 (Figure 1).5a The simplest
These epothilone analogues were generated by two distinct
strategies that rely on the formation of C-15 bromomethyl
ketones derived from intermediates in the Danishefsky total
synthesis of 9,10-didehydroepothilone D (1).5a The first
approach involves an early-stage functionalization of the
relatively simple methyl ketone 8. By conserving the more
complex fragment 11, this route is valuable for material
throughput of a selected candidate (Scheme 1). The second
Scheme 1. Synthesis of
C-15-(2-Methylthiazol-4-yl)-9,10-didehydroepothilone D (2)
Figure 1. Structures of (E)-9,10-didehydroepothilones.
of these analogues (2) contains a 2-methylthiazol-4-yl
substituent attached directly to the C-15 position of the
epothilone scaffold.9 This structural alteration results in not
only a reduction of the steric bulk of the side chain relative
to 1 but also a repositioning of the thiazole basic nitrogen.
Functionalization at the 2-position of the thiazole can be used
to simply increase the steric bulk at C-15 as in 3 or to probe
the hydrogen bonding requirements of the side chain as well
(4-7). Nicolaou and co-workers have reported that appropri-
ate positioning of a side-chain basic nitrogen is vital to the
cytotoxic potency of epothilone B analogues.10,11 Further-
more, a recent model of epothilone A binding to tubulin
reported by Snyder and Downing, based in part on the
Nicolaou work, suggests that the thiazole nitrogen of the
natural product may accept a hydrogen bond from His227
of â-tubulin.12 In hopes of preserving this interaction, the
four biaryl analogues (4-7), each of which contains a
nitrogen-bearing distal ring, were targeted for total synthesis.
strategy is characterized by a late-stage divergence, useful
for multiple analogue generation, as detailed in Scheme 2.
The synthesis of analogue 2 as described in Scheme 1
required conversion of methyl ketone 8 to its bromomethyl
counterpart 9. This two-step procedure utilized silyl enol
ether formation with TMS triflate followed by NBS-
promoted electrophilic bromination. The reaction of the
resulting bromomethyl ketone (9) with thioacetamide gener-
ated the desired thiazole with concomitant removal of the
TBS protecting group. This cyclization product (10) was
acylated with carboxylic acid 115a to provide the desired ester
12, which was then treated with Grubbs' second-generation
ruthenium catalyst13 to afford the intermediate macrocycle.
Final acidic deprotection yielded the desired C-15 thiazole
analogue 2 by a synthetic route that was beneficial for the
development of our synthetic strategy, namely, bromination
and cyclization, but was not optimal for the synthesis of
multiple analogues.
(9) C-15-(2-Methylthiazol-4-yl)epothilone D is a known compound with
micromolar cytotoxicity: Su, D.-S.; Balog, A.; Meng, D.; Bertinato, P.;
Danishefsky, S. J.; Zheng, Y.-H.; Chou, T.-C.; He, L.; Horwitz, S. B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2093.
(10) Nicolaou, K. C.; Scarpelli, R.; Bollbuck, B.; Werschkun, B.; Pereira,
M. M. A.; Wartmann, M.; Altmann, K.-H.; Zaharevitz, D.; Gussio, R.;
Giannakakou, P. Chem. Biol. 2000, 7, 593.
(11) For more recent work, see: (a) Bold, G.; Wojeik, S.; Caravatti,
G.; Lindauer, R.; Stierlin, C.; Gertsch, J.; Wartmann, M.; Altmann, K.-H.
ChemMedChem 2006, 1, 37. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Pratt, B. A.; Arseniyadis,
S.; Wartmann, M.; O’Brate, A.; Giannakakou, P. ChemMedChem 2006, 1,
41.
(12) Nettles, J. H.; Li, H.; Cornett, B.; Krahn, J. M.; Snyder, J. P.;
Downing, K. H. Science 2004, 305, 866.
A more efficient route for the rapid generation of structural
diversity is detailed in Scheme 2. Because macrocyclic
(13) (a) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett.
1999, 1, 953. (b) Garber, S. B.; Kingsbury, J. S.; Gray, B. L.; Hoveyda, A.
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8168.
3058
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 14, 2006