C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
-OH (pKa ≈ 9.6) should be >95% (see Figure S1 in Supporting
Information), and found that the corresponding emission spectrum
(λmax ) 395 nm, see Figure S1) is the same of that in pH ) 7. In
view of the different absorption spectra with the same emission
profiles, we tentatively propose that the excited-state proton
dissociation takes place in pH ) 7, giving rise to a 395 nm anionic
1 emission. Given the evidence of large a Stokes-shifted 395 nm
emission for 1 in neutral water, it is reasonable to expect that such
an anionic species can be further stabilized by solvation, such that
the further proton transfer is highly thermally unfavorable (see
Figure 2). Studies in low pH (<5.0) are rather complicated owing
to the protonation at the pyridyl nitrogen site.
In conclusion, the first synthesis and spectroscopic studies of 1
are reported. The differentiation of photophysics between alcohol
(solvent catalyzed proton-transfer reaction) and water (deprotona-
tion) are intriguing. In view of bioapplications, we thus suspect
that once 1 is in certain hydrophilic medium, similar to that in
alcohol, a water catalyzed excited-state proton-transfer reaction may
take place, allowing it to serve as a suitable molecular probe. We
also performed the molecular dynamic approaches for 1 using a
homology model of human 5-HT1B serotonin receptor to investigate
the difference of interaction to the 5-HT1B receptor between 1a
and 1. Our preliminary data indicate that 1 has larger association
strength than that of 1a, exhibiting its great potential to serve as a
5-HT1B agonist or antagonist for the treatment of aggression or
depression. We thus believe that exploration of 1 may spark a broad
spectrum of interest in the fields of medicinal chemistry and
biophysics.
Figure 1. Absorption (dash) and emission (solid) spectra of 1a (gray) and
1 (black) in ethanol. Emission spectrum of 1 in pH ) 7 is shown by the
red solid line. The excitation wavelength is 300 nm. Inset shows the relax-
ation dynamics of 1 in ethanol, monitored at 340 nm (red) and 540 nm
(green).
Acknowledgment. This work is supported by the National
Science Council and National Center for High-Performance Com-
puting, Taiwan.
Figure 2. The proposed excited-state behavior of 1 in alcohol and water.
consisting of short wavelength (the F1 band) and long wavelength
(the F2 band) bands maximized at 365 (the F1 band) and 538 nm
(the F2 band), respectively. The fluorescence excitation spectra
monitored at the F1 and F2 bands are identical and are also the
same as the absorption profile. The result eliminates the possibility
that the dual emission is resulting from trace impurities. Further-
more, the ratio of the F2 versus the F1 band is concentration
independent from 10-5-10-3 M in ethanol, discarding a proposal
that the F2 band originates from aggregation. Alternatively, the
results can more plausibly be rationalized by the ethanol (or
methanol) catalyzed proton-transfer reaction for 1 depicted in Figure
2. Figure 2 depicts a two-step proton-transfer mechanism, in which
there exists a fast equilibrium between the 1:1 alcohol/1 cyclic HB
structure (C*) and other complexes generally described as 2:1
alcohol/1 noncyclic HB structure (N*). Proton-transfer thus takes
place from C*, resulting in a green proton-transfer tautomer (T*)
emission.
Supporting Information Available: Listing of experimental details
and characterization data for all compounds. This material is available
References
(1) (a) Barnes, N. M.; Sharp, T. Neuropharmacology 1999, 38, 1038. (b)
Svenningsson, P.; Chergui, K.; Rachleff, I.; Flajolet, M.; Zhang, X.;
Yacoubi, M. E.; Vaugeois, J. M.; Nomikos, G. G.; Greengard, P. Science
2006, 311, 77.
(2) (a) Gingrich, J. A.; Hen, R. Psychopharmacology (Berlin), 2001, 155, 1.
(b) Manji, H. K.; Drevets, W. C.; Charney, D. S. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 541.
(3) (a) Flaugh, M. E.; Mullen, D. L.; Fuller, R. W.; Mason, N. R. J. Med.
Chem. 1988, 31, 1746. (b) Malleron, J. L.; Gueremy, C.; Mignani, S.;
Peyronel, J. F.; Truchon, A.; Blanchard, J. C.; Doble, A.; Laduron, P.;
Piot, O. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 1194. (c) Mattson, R. J.; Catt, J. D.;
Denhart, D. J.; Deskus, J. A.; Ditta, J. L.; Higgins, M. A.; Marcin, L. R.;
Sloan, C. P.; Beno, B. R.; Gao, Q.; Cunningham, M. A.; Mattson, G. K.;
Molski, T. F.; Taber, M. T.; Lodge, N. J. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 6023.
(4) (a) Brause, R.; Kru¨gler, D.; Schmitt, M.; Kleinermanns, K. J. Chem. Phys.
2005, 123, 224311. (b) Rogers, D. M.; Besley, N. A.; Hirst, J. D. J. Phys.
Chem. B 2005, 109, 23061. (c) Kang, C.; Yi, J. T.; Pratt, D. W. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 2006, 423, 7.
The scheme proposed above is based on a well-established
mechanism associated with 7-azaindole and its corresponding
analogues.8 Further support of this precursor-successor type of
proton-transfer mechanism is rendered by the relaxation dynamics,
in which a single-exponential decay time of 360 ( 30 ps for the
F1 band (monitored at 340 nm), within experimental error, correlates
well with the 385 ( 40 ps risetime of the F2 band (monitored at
540 nm, see the inset in Figure 1). Interestingly, however, a unique
emission maximized at 395 nm (τf ≈ 0.5 ns) was observed for 1 in
aqueous solution (pH ≈ 7, see Figure 1). The fact that we could
not resolve any steady-state emission and rise-decay dynamics of
the F2 band, in combination with the good fluorescence yield (0.15),
leads us to propose that H2O assisted excited-state proton transfer
may be prohibited in aqueous solution. We further carried out the
luminescence study at pH ) 11.5, in which the deprotonation of
(5) (a) Chen, Y.; Gai, F.; Petrich, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 2203. (b)
Rich, R. L.; Gai, F.; Lane, J. W.; Petrich, J. W.; Schwabacher, A. W. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 733. (c) Kelepouris, L.; Blanchard, G. J. J.
Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 6600.
(6) Chen, Y.; Rich, R. L.; Gai, F.; Petrich, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97,
1770.
(7) Maze´as, D.; Guillaumet, G.; Viaud, M. C. Heterocycles 1999, 50, 1065.
(8) (a) Chapman, C. F.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 8430. (b)
Stratt, R. M.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 12981. (c) Chou,
P. T.; Yu, W. S.; Wei, C. Y.; Cheng, Y. M.; Yang, C. Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 3599. (d) Chou, P. T.; Wu, G. R.; Wei, C. Y.; Shiao, M.
Y.; Liu, Y. I. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 8863. (e) Chou, P. T.; Liao, J.
H.; Wei, C. Y.; Yang, C. Y.; Yu, W. S.; Chou, Y. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 986. (f) Hung, F. T.; Hu, W. P.; Chou, P. T. J. Phys. Chem.
A 2001, 105, 10475. (g) Yu, W. S.; Cheng, C. C.; Chang, C. P.; Wu, G.
R.; Hsu, C. H.; Chou, P. T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 8006. (h) Chou,
P. T.; Cheng, Y. M.; Yu, W. S.; Pu, S. C. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107,
5640. (i) Hu, W. P.; You, R. M.; Yen, S. Y.; Hung, F. T.; Chou, P. H.;
Chou, P. T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 370, 139.
JA064310E
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 45, 2006 14427