on PI3K-bound 2.3c Surprisingly, though, given the impor-
tance of these compounds, synthetic methodology in this area
has been relatively slow to develop.4 Notable achievements
include a very elegant total synthesis of 1 by Sorensen et
al.4a and both formal and total syntheses of 2 by Shibasaki
et al.4b-d
Recently, we described a new synthetic approach to the
viridin (1) class of furanosteroids, involving bond discon-
nection at C1-C10 (cf. 3 f 4 in Scheme 1).5 The pivital
insertion of methoxyacetaldehyde or congenors between the
C3-and C10-positions in furanoacid derivatives of type 7
(Scheme 2).7 However, while in our viridin model studies
Scheme 2. Wortmannin (2) Synthetic Analysis
Scheme 1. Viridin (1) Synthetic Analysis
step in this strategy requires dearomatization of ring B in 3,
raising the possibility that the reverse process 4 f 3 might
be energetically more favorable. However, a search of the
literature revealed that simple retro-aldol products of type 3
are not known in viridin chemistry. Nor, it appears, are
naturally occurring C1-epimers of 1,1-3 although aldol-like
equilibration would provide a straightforward pathway for
isomerization. We took these observations as evidence of
the thermodynamic stability of the C1-C10 bond in 1, the
formation of which relieves strong peri-interactions between
the coplanar C4-, C10-, and C11-substituents in open chain
species of type 3.6 Model studies lent support to this premise.
Thus, on TiCl4-catalyzed ring closure, aldehyde 5 was rapidly
transformed to a 4:1 mixture of aldol products 6-syn/anti in
75% overall yield.5 Under no circumstances could we detect
equilibration between 6-syn and 6-anti.
the correct stereochemistry at C1-C10 is kinetically favored
by a lower energy Burgi-Dunitz trajectory angle,5,8 no such
bias is likely in the intermolecular conversion of 7 to 2.
Conversely, an argument could be made that the desired
anti-stereochemistry at C1-C10 would predominate under
thermodynamic control, notwithstanding the fact that this
geometry corresponds to a 1,2-diaxial orientation (Scheme
2). Taking 11-desacetoxywortmannin (8) as an example,
models clearly show that the “unnatural” syn-isomer 1-epi-8
suffers from steric crowding of two types not found in 8.
One of these is an additional gauche interaction between the
C1-methoxymethyl and C10-methyl groups (curved arrow),
while the other corresponds to a strong boat “1,4-flagpole”
interaction between the C1-methoxymethyl and C11-H groups
(best seen in the stereoviews derived from MM2 minimiza-
tion). Calculations at the AM1 level of computation re-
inforced this analysis, with a 3.6 kcal difference in heat of
formation between 8 and 1-epi-8.9
In principle, a similar strategy might be applied to the
synthesis of wortmannin (2) and analogues, involving formal
(3) (a) Wymann, M. P.; Bulgarelli-Leva, G.; Zvelebil, M. J.; Pirola, L.;
Vanhaesebroeck, B.; Waterfield, M. D.; Panatotou, G. Mol. Cell Biol. 1996,
16, 1722. (b) Norman, B. H.; Shih, C.; Toth, J. E.; Ray, J. E.; Dodge, J. A.;
Johnson, D. W.; Rutherford, P. G.; Schultz, R. M.; Worzalla, J. F.; Vlahos,
C. J. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 1106. (c) Walker, E. H.; Pacoid, M. E.;
Perisic, O.; Stephens, L.; Hawkins, P. T.; Wymann, M. P.; Williams, R. L.
Mol. Cell 2000, 6, 909.
(4) (a) Anderson, E. A.; Alexanian, E. J.; Sorensen, E. J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1998. (b) Honzawa, S.; Mizutani, T.; Shibasaki, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 311. (c) Mizutani, T.; Honzawa, S.; Tosaki,
S.-y.; Shibasaki, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4680. (d) Shigehisa,
H.; Mizutani, T.; Tosaki, S.-y.; Ohshima, T.; Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron
2005, 61, 5057.
To test this hypothesis, we prepared the model furanoacid
derivatives 14a-d, making use of the alkyne oxazole
(7) The reverse of this process is known for both 2 and 8 but requires
refluxing in 2 N HCl; cf. (a) MacMillan, J.; Simpson, T. J.; Vanstone, A.
E.; Yeboah, S. K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1972, 2892, 2898. (b)
Haefliger, W.; Hauser, D. HelV. Chim. Acta 1973, 56, 2901.
(8) Burgi, H. B.; Dunitz, J. D. Acc. Chem. Res. 1983, 16, 153.
(9) Spartan ’02 v1.0.4e (Wavefunction, Inc., Irvine, CA). We are grateful
to Professor Dennis Wright (UConn) for carrying out these calculations.
(5) Sessions, E. H.; Jacobi, P. A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4125.
(6) For related examples, see: (a) Garduno-Ramirez, M. L.; Trejo, A.;
Navarro, V.; Bye, R.; Linares, E.; Delgrado, G. J. Nat. Prod. 2001, 64,
432. (b) Burgueno-Tapia, E.; Bucio, M. A.; Rivera, A.; Joseph-Nathan, P.
J. Nat. Prod. 2001, 64, 518.
3222
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 17, 2007