6806
H. Zhu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 6803–6806
from Hammond’s postulate, the computed transition structures
corresponding to these substrates have earlier transition states
with respect to the angle about the carbonyl carbon being reduced
and the nascent C–H bond. The imaginary frequencies associated
with the reaction coordinate motion at the saddle point also fall
roughly into three classes. For substrates bearing no ortho-substit-
uents, the imaginary frequencies average to 742i cmÀ1 with little
variation in their values. For the second class of reactants, those
bearing a single ortho-substituent, the imaginary frequencies are
all of a significantly larger magnitude, averaging to 787 cmÀ1. Fi-
nally, benzaldehydes bearing two ortho-substituents have imagi-
nary frequencies averaging to 835 cmÀ1. This suggests that the
reduced mass of the reaction coordinate motion at the transition
state is dropping as one progresses from class to class. The associ-
ated reduced masses from representative members of each class
support this hypothesis, as the imaginary frequencies have associ-
ated reduced masses of 2.18 amu for 4-methylbenzaldehyde,
2.04 amu for 2,4-dimethylbenzaldehyde, and 1.96 amu for 2,6-
dimethylbenzaldehyde. Structurally, these differences can be
understood in terms of the most important bond lengths in the
transition structures, those corresponding to the forming and
breaking C–H bonds. Substrates bearing two ortho-substituents
have markedly longer CIpc–H bonds, while those bearing a single
ortho-substituent have longer (O@)C–H bonds.
The transition structures characterized in Table 2 are qualita-
tively similar to semi-empirical transition structures reported in
earlier studies.18–20 Both density functional theory and AM1 tran-
sition structures differ from the qualitative structures shown in
Figure 1 in one important respect: the six-membered scaffold of
atoms that are primarily involved in the reaction coordinate at
the transition state form more of a half-chair structure instead of
a boat-like arrangement. Even with this important difference, the
structures shown in Figure 3 exhibit similar non-bonding interac-
tions as those that might be expected from the qualitative struc-
tures in Figure 1. Primarily, the axial methyl group upon the
isopinocampheyl group appears to be a principal director of
stereoselection.
two ortho-substituents. These exceptions have been explained
using a structure-selectivity experiment, whereby the variably
substituted d-benzaldehyde isotopologs were investigated as sub-
strates in (R)-Alpine-Borane reduction. The d-benzaldehyde sub-
strates that contained 2,6-disubstitution were found to be react
with significantly impaired selectivity, implying the role of a
non-selective side reaction. These results, in conjunction with pre-
vious findings, implicate 9-BBN as the non-selective reductant in
this side reaction. Computational models of the transition struc-
tures for favored re attack of (R)-Alpine-Borane upon the eleven
substrates tested here suggest that the eleven variably substituted
benzaldehydes may be parsed into three classes.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Graduate Research Committee (UC Merced) for
funding and Mike Colvin (UC Merced) for the use of his Linux
cluster.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental procedures, NMR integra-
tion results, computational procedures, and energies and geome-
tries of all calculated structures) associated with this article can
References and notes
1. (a) Brown, H. C.; Ramachandran, P. V. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 16–24; (b)
Midland, M. M. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1553–1561; (c) Corey, E. J.; Helal, C. J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1986–2012; (d) Srebnik, M. Aldrichim. Acta
1987, 20, 9–24.
2. (a) Midland, M. M.; Tramontano, A.; Zderic, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99,
5211–5213; (b) Midland, M. M.; Greer, S.; Tramontano, A.; Zderic, S. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 2352–2355.
3. Midland, M. M.; McLoughlin, J. I. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 1316–1317.
4. Midland, M. M.; McLoughlin, J. I.; Gabriel, J. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 159–165.
5. Midland, M. M.; Petre, J. E.; Zderic, S. A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1979, 182, C53–C56.
6. Midland, M. M.; Petre, J. E.; Zderic, S. A.; Kazubski, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104,
528–531.
Substrates bearing a single ortho-substituent display the high-
est reactivity toward Alpine-Borane reduction. This finding is puz-
zling, considering that computed transition structures for the
Alpine-Borane reduction of these compounds show moderate coin-
cidence of the ortho-substituent and the proximal methyl group on
the isopinocampheyl moiety (Fig. 3). This observation raises the
possibility of complementarity in stereoselective reactions. The
origin of this behavior is not easily understood, given the numer-
ous physical phenomena that determine both reactivity and selec-
tivity: orbital interactions, steric interactions, reaction synchrony,
configurational entropy, etc. One possibility is that complementary
reactants or catalyst–reactant pairs naturally form complexes that
restrict allowable geometries to near-attack conformers (NACs).
This explanation has served as an explanation of how enzymes
convert binding energy into catalytic power.21,22
7. Brown, H. C.; Pai, G. G. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1384–1394.
8. Midland, M. M.; Tramontano, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 3549–3552.
9. Midland, M. M.; McDowell, D. C.; Hatch, R. L.; Tramontano, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1980, 102, 867–869.
10. Midland, M. M.; Tramontano, A.; Kazubski, A.; Graham, R. S.; Tsai, D. J. S.;
Cardin, D. B. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 1371–1380.
11. Meyer, M. P.; DelMonte, A. J.; Singleton, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
10865–10874.
12. Singleton, D. A.; Christian, C. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 1631–1634.
13. Singleton, D. A.; Wang, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2033–2036.
14. Singleton, D. A.; Wang, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6679–6685.
15. Saavedra, J.; Stafford, S. E.; Meyer, M. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 3027–3030.
16. Meddour, A.; Canet, I.; Loewenstein, A.; Péchiné, J. M.; Courtieu, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 9652–9656.
17. Canet, I.; Courtieu, J.; Loewenstein, A.; Meddour, A.; Péchiné, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 6520–6526.
18. Rogic, M. M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1341–1346.
19. Rogic, M. M.; Ramachandran, P. V.; Zinnen, H.; Brown, L. D.; Zheng, M.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 1287–1303.
20. Rogic, M. M. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6868–6875.
21. Bruice, T. C.; Benkovic, S. J. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 6267–6274.
22. Bruice, T. C.; Lightstone, F. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 127–136.
In this Letter, we have presented the results of an empirical and
computational structure–reactivity study that displays a high de-
gree of correlation, excepting substrate benzaldehydes bearing