A. T. Khan et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 7891–7894
7893
Table 1 (continued)
Entry
t
Substrate 1
Time (min)
50
Product 2a
Yieldb (%)
85
O
O
O
O
OTHP
OH
OH
O
OTHP
O
O
O
u
v
85
90
83
81
O
O
O
O
O
O
OBn
O
OBn
HO
BnO
BnO
THPO
BnO
BnO
O
OMe
OMe
O
O
N
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
HO
THPO
w
45
90
O
O
O
O
a All products were characterized by IR, 1H NMR and elemental analysis.
b Isolated yields.
c Yield based on starting material recovery.
Table 2. Tetrahydropyranylation of 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol 1b using
various forms of cupric sulfatea
Acknowledgements
A.T.K. thanks the DST, New Delhi for a financial grant
(Grant No SP/S1/G-35/98), L.H.C. and S.G. are grateful
to IITG for their research fellowships. The authors are
also grateful to the referee for his valuable comments
and suggestions.
Run
Catalyst
Conversion (%)
Time (min/[h])
1
2
3
4
CuSO4Æ5H2
CuSO4
O
100
80
90
0
45
[3]
CuSO4ÆSiO2
SiO2
[2.5]
[3]
a Reactions were monitored by GC.
References and notes
1
characterized by IR, H NMR spectroscopy and by ele-
mentalanayl ses. The most interesting feature is that the
THP ether 2a undergoes cleavage within 5h using same
catalyst (20mol%) in methanol in 85% yield.19 Other
THP ethers 2b, 2c, 2f and 2k were converted to the
respective hydroxylcompounds 1b, 1c, 1f and 1k within
2–6h in 80–85% yields under identical reaction
conditions.
1. Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups
in Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New
York, 1999; p 49.
2. (a) Corey, E. J.; Niwa, H.; Knolle, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1978, 100, 1942; (b) Bernady, K. F.; Floyd, M. B.; Poletto,
J. F.; Weiss, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 1438.
3. Alper, H.; Dinkes, L. Synthesis 1972, 81.
4. Miyashita, M.; Yoshikoshi, A.; Grieco, P. A. J. Org.
Chem. 1977, 42, 3772.
5. Rezai, N.; Meybodi, F. A.; Salehi, P. Synth. Commun.
2000, 30, 1799.
6. Deka, N.; Sarma, J. C. Synth. Commun. 2000, 30, 4435.
7. Reddy, M. A.; Reddy, L. R.; Bhanumathi, N.; Rao, K. R.
Synth. Commun. 2000, 30, 4323.
8. Hon, Y.-S.; Lee, C.-F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2389.
9. Naik, S.; Gopinath, R.; Patel, B. K. Tetrahedron Lett.
2001, 42, 7679.
10. Namboodiri, V. V.; Varma, R. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002,
43, 1143.
11. Mineno, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7975.
12. Namboodiri, V. V.; Verma, R. S. Chem. Commun. 2002,
342.
13. Yadav, J. S.; Subba Reddy, B. V.; Gnaneshwar, D. New J.
Chem. 2003, 202.
14. Khan, A. T.; Mondal, E.; Borah, B. M.; Ghosh, S. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 4113.
15. Sartori, G.; Ballini, R.; Bigi, F.; Bosica, G.; Maggi, R.;
Righi, P. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 199.
The tetrahydropyranylation of 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol
1b was investigated with the various forms of cupric sul-
fate to find out the relative efficiencies (Table 2). Cupric
sulfate pentahydrate showed the highest catalytic activ-
ity in terms of reaction time and yield.
In summary, the present methodology demonstrates Cu-
SO4Æ5H2O as an effective catalyst for tetrahydropyranyl-
ation/depyranylation of alcohols and phenols. The main
advantages of our protocol are: mild, clean, environ-
mentally benign reaction conditions as well as good
yields. In addition, our methodology might be useful
for the substrates containing acid-sensitive protecting
groups because of the almost neutral reaction condi-
tions. Furthermore, this method is also expected to have
better applicability in organic synthesis due to the
low cost of the reagent. We believe this protocol will
be
methodologies.
a
usefuladdition to the modern synthetic
16. Khan, A. T.; Mondal, E.; Ghosh, S.; Islam, S. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 22, 2002.