C. Wei et al. / Thermochimica Acta 421 (2004) 1–9
9
[2] M. Reisch, Chem. Eng. News 77 (9) (1999) 11.
[3] Business Concentrates, Chem. Eng. News 78 (25) (2000) 15.
[4] Hydroxylamine and its Salts, Manufacturing Chemist and Aerosol
News, 35 (8) (1964) 29–36.
[5] L.O. Cisneros, W.J. Rogers, M.S. Mannan, Adiabatic calorimetric
decomposition studies of 50 wt.% hydroxylamine/water, J. Hazard.
Mater. 82 (1) (2001) 13–24.
[6] Y. Iwata, H. Koseki, F. Hosoya, Study on decomposition of hydrox-
ylamine/water solution, J. Loss Prevent. Proc. Ind. 16 (2003) 41–53.
[7] A.D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 5648;
the two cases may explain why the maximum self-heat
rate and pressure rate were higher in acid solutions than in
alkaline solutions. Once the decomposition is initiated in
tions, the branching reaction is less exothermic. The major
gas product, N2O is produced by the dimerization of HNO
as shown in Eq. (19), which was studied thoroughly by Lin
et al. [21] and Ruud et al. [22]. The calculated heat of re-
action of −366.9 kJ/mol for Eq. (19) is in good agreement
with the experimental value of −360.2 kJ/mol [23].
J.P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B33 (1986) 8822.
[8] T.H. Dunning Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 90 (1989) 1007.
[9] M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb,
J.R. Cheeseman, V.G. Zakrzewski, J.A. Montgomery Jr., R.E. Strat-
mann, J.C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J.M. Millam, A.D. Daniels, K.N.
Kudin, M.C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi,
R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J.
Ochterski, G.A. Petersson, P.Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, N.
Rega, P. Salvador, J.J. Dannenberg, D.K. Malick, A.D. Rabuck, K.
Raghavachari, J.B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J.V. Ortiz, A.G. Baboul,
B.B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R.
Gomperts, R.L. Martin, D.J. Fox, T. Keith, M.A. Al-Laham, C.Y.
Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P.M.W. Gill, B. Johnson,
W. Chen, M.W. Wong, J.L. Andres, C. Gonzalez, M. Head-Gordon,
E.S. Replogle, J.A. Pople, Gaussian’98, Revision A.11.3, Gaussian
Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 2002.
[10] M.A. Grolmes, J.C. Leung, H.K. Fauske, Reactive systems vent
sizing evaluations, in: Proceedings of the International Symposium on
Runaway Reactions, CCPS, Cambridge, MA, March 1989, pp. 451–
476.
[11] M.J. Creed, H.K. fauske, An easy and inexpensive approach to the
DIERS methodology, Chem. Eng. Prog. 86 (3) (1990) 45–49.
[12] S. Chippett, P. Ralbovsky, R. Granville, The APTAC: a high pres-
sure, low thermal inertia, adiabatic calorimeter, in: Proceedings of
the International Symposium on Runaway Reaction, Pressure Relief
Design and Effluent Handling, 1998, pp. 81–108.
The heats of reaction were calculated at the B3P86/
cc-pVDZ level of theory using Gaussian 98. All species
were treated in the gas phase. The calculated overall heat
of reaction of −138.9 kJ/mol is close to our experimental
results (about −125.5 kJ/mol) even though the runaway
reaction starts in the condensed phase.
5. Conclusions
The thermal decomposition of hydroxylamine with
acid/base impurity was studied based on experimental re-
sults from the RSST and APTAC calorimeters and quantum
mechanical calculations. Our studies have shown that ther-
mal decomposition behavior of hydroxylamine is affected
by the presence of acid or base. Two different decomposi-
tion reaction pathways can be initiated when acid or base is
mixed with hydroxylamine. Hydrogen ion can increase the
maximum self-heat and pressure rates while hydroxide ion
can decrease the onset temperature and generate more gas
products. Hydroxylamine must be handled and stored with
caution because accidental mixing with impurities can pose
an energy release hazard at lower temperatures. The mecha-
nisms proposed in this paper provide a better understanding
of hydroxylamine chemistry.
[13] D.I. Townsend, J.C. Tou, Thermal hazard evaluation by an acceler-
ating rate calorimeter, Thermochim. Acta 37 (1) (1980) 1–30.
[15] S. Lunak, J. Veprek-Siska, Catalytic effect of cations on the de-
composition of alkaline solutions of hydroxylamine, Collect. Czech.
Chem. Commun. 39 (2) (1974) 391–395.
[16] K.A. Hofmann, Friedrich Kroll, Thermal Decomposition of Hydrox-
ylamine and Hydrazine Salts, Berichte, 57B, 1924, 937–944 (in Ger-
man).
[17] L.O. Cisneros, W.J. Rogers, M.S. Mannan, Effect of air in the thermal
decomposition of 50 mass% hydroxylamine/water, J. Hazard. Mater.
95 (1–2) (2002) 13–25.
[18] M.N. Hughes, H.G. Nicklin, Autoxidation of hydroxylamine in al-
kaline solutions. Part II, J. Chem. Soc. (A) 22 (1971) 3485–3487.
[19] E. Ebler, E. Schott, J. Prakt. Chem. 78 (2) (1908) 289.
[20] E.L. øiestad, E. Uggerud, The unimolecular chemistry of protonated
hydroxylamine, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 185–186–187 (1999) 231–
240.
[21] M.C. Lin, Y. He, C.F. Melius, Theoretical interpretation of the kinet-
ics and mechanisms of the HNO + HNO and HNO + 2NO reactions
with a unified model, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 24 (1992) 489–516.
[22] K. Ruud, T. Helgaker, E. Uggerud, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 393
(1997) 59–71.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Mary Kay O’Connor Pro-
cess Safety Center (MKOPSC) at Texas A&M University.
We are grateful to the supercomputing Facility at Texas
A&M University for computer time and the Laboratory for
Molecular Simulation at Texas A&M University for soft-
ware and support.
References
[23] J.A. Miller, C.T. Bowman, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 15 (1989)
287.
[1] J.L. Gustin, Influence of trace impurities on chemical reaction haz-
ards, J. Loss Prevent. Proc. Ind. 15 (2002) 37–48.