nontoxic polymer coproduct of the silicone industry as the
stoichiometric reducing agent, has opened up a new perspec-
tive to asymmetric hydrosilylation.
containing different ratios of Cu:Al, such as 2:1, 2.5:1, and 3:1,
15
were prepared according to the literature procedure (see
Supporting Information) and screened in the presence of PMHS
using 4-methylacetophenone as a model substrate. Catalyst A
(Cu:Al ) 3:1) was found to be more active than catalyst B
(Cu:Al ) 2.5:1) and catalyst C (Cu:Al ) 2:1). The effect of
organic solvents and chiral ligands on the asymmetric hydrosi-
lylation of 4-methylacetophenone was also examined (see Table
1). A significant decrease in the rate of reaction and a small
Buchwald described a highly enantioselective 1,4-reduc-
tion of R,ꢀ-unsaturated esters and ꢀ-substituted enones, using
an active catalyst generated in situ from the CuCl/NaO-t-
8
Bu/chiral diphosphine ligand and PMHS. The effectiveness
of copper for hydrosilylation of carbonyl compounds was
9
reported by Lipshutz and his group. Their subsequent studies
led to the development of highly enantioselective hydrosi-
lylation of ketones based on CuCl/NaO-t-Bu and chiral
1
0
diphosphine ligands. Besides copper alkoxides, copper
fluoride and copper(II) acetate also catalyze the asymmetric
hydrosilylation of ketones in the presence of a BINAP ligand
Table 1. Screening of Reaction Parameters for the Asymmetric
Hydrosilylation of 4-Methylacetophenone at Room Temperature
a
1
1
under homogeneous conditions.
Industry favors the catalytic process induced by a hetero-
geneous catalyst over the homogeneous one in view of its
ease of handling, simple workup, and regenerability. Re-
cently, Lipshutz reported copper-in-charcoal, and we reported
nanocrystalline copper(II) oxide for asymmetric hydrosily-
b
entry catalyst
ligand
BINAP
BINAP
BINAP
BINAP
BIPHEP
BINAM
time (h) yield (%)
91
ee (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
Cat A
Cat A
Cat B
Cat C
Cat A
Cat A
Cat A
Cat A
Cat A
Cat A
Cat A
Cat A
9
83
83 , 75
12
lation reactions. Layered double hydroxides or hydrotalcite-
like compounds (HTs) have received much attention in view
of their potential applications as adsorbents, anion exchang-
c
d
c
d
c
d
24 , 5
12
21 , 87
56
80
80
81
78
-
12
72
1
3
12
44
ers, and most importantly, as catalysts. As part of our
ongoing research aimed at the development of solid catalysts
24
14
1
4
bisoxazoline 24
trace
-
10
15
52
for asymmetric synthesis, we herein present the results on
the use of Cu-Al hydrotalcite catalyst for the asymmetric
hydrosilylation of ketones to chiral secondary alcohols in
good yields with excellent enantiomeric excess (ee) at room
temperature using BINAP as a chiral auxiliary and PMHS
as the stoichiometric reducing agent (Scheme 1).
BINOL
BINAP
BINAP
BINAP
BINAP
24
24
24
12
2
-
e
75
68
78
80
f
0
1
g
h
12
87
a
Reaction conditions: 4-methylacetophenone (1 mmol), PMHS (4
mmol), Cu-Al hydrotalcite (10 mg), solvent (3 mL), chiral ligand (7 mg).
b
c
d
e
Isolated yields, Reaction at - 40 °C. Reaction at 60 °C. THF was
f
g
h
used. CH2Cl2 was used. Ether was used. 2 equiv of PhSiH3 was used.
Copper content (wt %): Cat A ) 34.11; Cat B ) 47.15; Cat C ) 46.07.
Scheme 1
amount of reduced product were obtained using polar solvents
such as THF. Nonpolar solvents such as toluene produced S-1-
(4-methylphenyl)ethanol in excellent yields and enantiomeric
excess (ee) at room temperature. Among the different chiral
ligands screened (Figure 1), commercially available BINAP
To identify and develop the best copper catalyst for the
asymmetric hydrosilylation of ketones, a series of hydrotalcites
(
7) (a) Gade, L. H.; Cesar, V.; Bellemin-Laponnaz, S. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1014. (b) Duan, W.-L.; Shi, M.; Rong, G. B. Chem.
Commun. 2003, 2916. (c) Evans, D.; Micheal, A. F. E.; Tedrow, J. S.;
Campos, K. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3534. (d) Yun, J.; Buchwald,
S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5640. (e) Halterman, R. L.; Ramsey,
T. M.; Chen, Z. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2642. (f) Riant, O.; Mostefai, N.;
Courmarcel, J. Synthesis 2004, 2943.
(
8) (a) Appella, D. H.; Moritani, Y.; Shintani, R.; Ferreira, E. M.;
Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9473. (b) Moritani, Y.;
Appella, D. H.; Jurkauskas, V; Buchwald, S. L J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
1
22, 6797.
(
9) Lipshutz, B. H.; Chrisman, W.; Noson, K. J. Organomet. Chem.
2
001, 624, 367.
Figure 1. Different chiral ligands used.
(
10) (a) Lipshutz, B. H.; Noson, K.; Chrisman, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2
2
001, 123, 12917. (b) Lipshutz, B. H.; Lower, A.; Noson, K. Org. Lett.
002, 4, 4045. (c) Lipshutz, B. H.; Noson, K.; Chrisman, W.; Lower, A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8779.
11) (a) Sirol, S.; Courmarcel, J.; Mostefai, N.; Riant, O. Org. Lett. 2001,
, 4111. (b) Lee, D.-W.; Yun, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5415.
gave excellent yields and ee’s greater than R-(+)-2,2′-bis(diphe-
nylphosphino)-6,6′-dimethoxy-1,1′-biphenyl (BIPHEP). The use
(
3
2980
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 14, 2008