C. Carpentier et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 56 (2015) 1244–1246
1245
PS
F
O
O
H
N
FmocHN
b,c
a
O
FmocHN
O
O
O
HO
d
F
OH
O
H
N
b,e
FmocHN
OH
O
7
F
F
O
O
O
O
H
H
d
N
N
FmocHN
FmocHN
OH
N
O
N
H
H
O
O
8
Scheme 2. Synthesis of a di- and a tripeptide using Fmoc-fluoroalanine. (a) Fmoc-Leu-OH, DIC, HOBt, DIEA DMAP, CH2Cl2; (b) piperidine/DMF 20%; (c) 6, HATU, NMM, DMF;
(d) TFA/H2O 95%; (e) Fmoc-Ala-OH, HATU, NMM, DMF.
(Olah’s reagent), Xtalfluor-E, and 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-
ene (DBU) in dry dichloromethane did not yield the compound
sought-after. No fluorination took place as evidenced by the absence
of signal by 19F NMR in the crude product of those reactions. As
HF-pyridine requires notoriously complicated handling precau-
tions, we tried substituting it for tetrabutylammonium fluoride
(TBAF) as the deprotection agent and source of hydrogen fluoride.
Using TBAF in tandem with Xtalfluor-E and DBU still did not yield
any fluorinated compound. The deoxofluorination reagent was next
changed for Deoxo-fluor with TBAF in dichloromethane, but still no
trace of a fluorinated compound was found. The first success
obtained was using a combination of 8 equiv of HF-pyridine, 2 equiv
of triethylamine trihydrofluoride, 1.5 of Xtalfluor-E and 3 in dichlo-
romethane, producing 4 though with a low yield. Substituting
HF-pyridine for TBAF or removing completely the external source
of HF from the reaction did not impact the resulting yield. The best
combination of reagents was found to be 2 equiv of XtalFluor-E and
4 equiv of triethylamine trihydrofluoride in dry dichloromethane,
which lead to the fluorinated oxazolidinone 4 in 59% yield.
Noteworthy of mention, performing the deprotection and the
deoxofluorination steps separately did not allow for the formation
of the desired compound 4 under any condition tried.
Another important transformation was the deprotection and
ring-opening steps to get 5. Again, we investigated unsuccessfully
different strategies, opening the ring first then deprotecting the
Cbz group by catalytic hydrogenation. Ring-opening with 2 N HCl
in dioxane, as proposed by Hoveyda et al., did give the linear com-
pound with yields never exceeding 70%.15 The following deprotec-
tion of the Cbz by catalytic hydrogenation yielded an unidentified
fluorinated compound that could not be isolated. This strategy was
abandoned as these two steps were best achieved with a one pot
reaction using 1 M BCl3 in DCM.17 This quick 30 min reaction gave
a white solid that was used as is for the final step of the synthesis.
The crude product was finally protected with Fmoc-OSu in a
the dipeptide from the resin. ES-MS confirmed the preparation of
the N-Fmoc-protected dipeptide and the purity was estimated to
60% by HPLC. Interestingly, NMR analyses were used to confirm
the structure of dipeptide 7. From those analyses, we could
conclude that 6 has a high enantiopurity, although it is also
possible that a kinetic resolution process leads to 7 with a high
diastereomeric excess. On the other hand, as reported by others,
elimination of HF leading to dehydroalanine was insignificant
under the reaction conditions used.15
To further demonstrate the usefulness of 6, the N-Fmoc-dipep-
tide 7 on the resin was deprotected using two 5 min treatments
with 20% piperidine in DMF and the resulting free dipeptide was
coupled with 2 equiv of N-Fmoc-
ing reagent. Since the ninhydrin test clearly showed an uncom-
pleted coupling, the resin was mixed with 10 equiv of N-Fmoc-
L-Alanine using HATU as activat-
L-
alanine and HATU for another 1 h. This second coupling resulted
in a complete reaction step. This increased difficulty of carrying
out the coupling can be explained by the lower nucleophilicity
of the amino group of the L-fluoroalanine, which is in agreement
with literature precedents.11,18,19 Interestingly, it was not possible
to observe the characteristic signals of dehydroalanine by NMR.
This indicates that HF elimination leading to dehydroalanine, if
any, occurred minimally during deprotection of and coupling to
fluoroalanine. The obtention of tripeptide 8 demonstrates the
possibility of using N-Fmoc-L-fluoroalanine 6 in solid-phase
peptide synthesis.
Conclusion
We reported the first synthesis of N-Fmoc-L-fluoroalanine and its
characterization. All steps have been optimized, especially the
deoxofluorination, the one pot Cbz-group deprotection and ring-
opening, and the Fmoc protection steps. Although HATU and a
higher concentration of reagents were necessary for high yield cou-
mixture of dioxane/water to yield the desired N-Fmoc-L-fluoroala-
pling, N-Fmoc-L-fluoroalanine 6 has been coupled efficiently to a
nine 6, which was fully characterized by 1D- and 2D-NMR
spectroscopy and by mass spectrometry (see also Supporting
information for salient spectroscopic data). The optical rotation
leucine linked to the Wang resin. Analysis of the dipeptide prepared
demonstrated that the coupling proceeded with very low racemiza-
tion and elimination. Addition of an alanine onto the dipeptide leads
to the preparation of a tripeptide by solid-phase peptide synthesis
on a classic Wang resin, demonstrating the usefulness of 6 for the
preparation of fluorinated bioactive peptides.
of N-Fmoc-
L
-fluoroalanine 6 was determined to be À6.7 (c = 1.06,
in methanol).
Work is currently underway to prepare such bioactive peptides
and to use them in biophysical studies with lipid membranes.
Solid-phase synthesis using 6
In order to demonstrate the utility of 6 for solid-phase peptide
synthesis, we coupled it to a L-Leucine attached to Wang Resin
Acknowledgments
(Scheme 2). The coupling was performed using 2 equiv of 6 and
using HATU as a coupling reagent. The coupling lasted 1 h. An
aliquot of the resin was then treated for 1 h with 95% TFA to cleave
This work was supported by the NSERC of Canada and the
FRQNT of Québec. C.C. and R.G. thank PROTEO and the FRQNT for