specificity was 13-HPODE:9-HPODE ) 53.2:46.8, which
is consistent with our previous report regarding the dual
positional specificity of maize LOX1 with linolenic acid
Scheme 1
4
a
(
LNA) as a substrate.
This is unusual and interesting, because the products of
most LOX reactions, even when carried out by a dual
2c,4b
positional specific LOX, are primarily 1 and 3.
A similar
product distribution is seen during autoxidation of methyl
7
linoleate in benzene. Formation of compounds 1 and 3 is
considered to be kinetically controlled while compounds 2
and 4 are thermodynamically controlled products. Figure 1
shows that maize LOX1 generates compounds 2 and 4 as
well as compounds 1 and 3 from LA. Particularly, the
nonstereoselective nature of this reaction is unique to dual
positional specific maize LOX1, and it implies that oxygen-
ation may occur outside the enzyme active site by a
nonenzymatic mechanism. Therefore, product distribution
was compared for the maize LOX1 reaction and autoxidation
of linoleic acid at different temperatures (Table 1). The
results showed that compounds 1 and 3 were the major
products (78%) at 0 °C (kinetically controlled); in contrast,
all four regiosiomers were formed in more comparable
amounts when the reaction was carried out at 50 °C
sified as nontraditional LOXs, because their patterns of regio-
and stereoselectivity are distinct from traditional LOX
enzymes. Even though issues regarding regioselectivity and
4
stereoselectivity of the LOX reaction have been extensively
5
addressed by many groups, the detailed catalytic mechanism
of the nontraditional dual positional LOX reaction remains
6
controversial. This study analyzes the regio- and stereo-
(thermodynamically controlled). More than 90% of the
selectivity of maize LOX1 and the structure and distribution
of its reaction products. Product analysis and molecular
modeling studies were conducted, and their implications with
regard to an enzyme-initiated catalytic mechanism are
discussed.
products were kinetically controlled compounds 1 and 3
when autoxidation was performed in the frozen state at -20
°
C. Therefore, the product distribution pattern in the maize
LOX1-catalyzed reaction is similar to that of thermodynami-
cally controlled autoxidation. The first and rate-determining
chemical step of the LOX1 reaction involves abstracting the
Recombinant maize LOX1 (free epitope or affinity tags)
was expressed in E. coli and purified by Q-Sepharose
6a,8
prochiral hydrogen from C-11. According to the two-step
4a
chromatography. Purified maize LOX1 was incubated with
LA, the reaction products reduced with TPP and isolated as
9
model, the abstraction of hydrogen from the substrate by
catalytically active Fe(III) produces a bis-allylic radical
intermediate with concurrent reduction of the iron cofactor
to catalytically inactive Fe(II). The second step is insertion
of dioxygen, which is accompanied by reoxidation of Fe(II)
to Fe(III), allowing LOX1 to recycle to an active state. The
two-step model is consistent with the nonstereoselective
outcome of the maize LOX1 reaction, because with such a
mechanism, the allyl radical intermediate could dissociate
from the enzyme active site after the first reaction step. Thus,
oxygenation of the bis-allylic radical intermediate could
subsequently occur outside of the enzyme active site by a
nonenzymatic mechanism.
5
reported previously. Structures of all regioisomers were
identified by GC-MS and NMR. The regioselectivity of
maize LOX1 was estimated from straight phase HPLC (SP-
HPLC), and enantiomeric ratios of each regioisomer were
determined by chiral phase HPLC (CP-HPLC).4 As seen
in Figure 1, maize LOX1 produced all four regioisomers, 1,
a,5
(4) (a) Kim, E. S.; Choi, E.; Kim, Y.; Cho, K.; Lee, A.; Shim, J.; Rakwal,
R.; Agrawal, G. K.; Han, O. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003, 52, 1203-1213. (b)
Hughes, R. K.; West, S. I.; Hornostaj, A. R.; Lawson, D. M.; Fairhurst, S.
A.; Sanchez, R. O.; Hough, P.; Robinson, B. H.; Casey, R. Biochem. J.
2
001, 353, 345-355. (c) Fuller, M. A.; Weichert, H.; Fischer, A. M.;
Feussner, I.; Grimes, H. D. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2001, 388, 146-154.
d) Garbe, L.; Almeida, R. B.; Nagel, R.; Wackerbauer, K.; Tressl, R. J.
Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 946-955.
5) Butovich, I. A.; Reddy, C. C. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1546,
(
(
3
79-398.
Figure 1. Regiochemical and stereochemical analysis of maize
LOX1 reaction products by SP-HPLC and CP-HPLC.
(6) (a) Knapp, M. J.; Seebeck, F. P.; Klinman, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 2931-2932. (b) Cho, K.; Jang, S.; Huon, T.; Park, S.; Han, O.
J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 40, 100-106.
(
90.
7) Porter, N. A.; Caldwell, S. E.; Mills, K. A. Lipids 1995, 30, 277-
2
6
(
8) Goldsmith, C. R.; Stack, T. D. P. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 6048-
2, 3, and 4, as racemic mixtures. Product formation was not
055.
significant with the boiled maize LOX1 enzyme under the
employed enzymatic incubation condition. The positional
(9) Schilstra, M. J.; Veldink, G. A.; Vliegenthart, J. F. G. Biochemistry
1994, 33, 3974-3979.
3114
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 16, 2007