First, a stoichiometric complex is formed with a reagent
bearing an appropriate trigger. A subsequent activation step
initiates a reaction between the guest and Cy molecules, most
likely in a selective way. Inclusion of precursor reagents into
the Cy cavity prior to activation has been claimed in several
cases in solution.10 Here, however, ligand exchange can
inhibit selectivity. Until now, only one functionalization by
a solid-state reaction has been reported.11 This attempt,
however, suffered from very low isolated yields (4-12%)
and only modest chemoselectivity.
Recently, we described the formation of a well-character-
ized 1:2 complex of aziadamantane (1) with R-cyclodextrin
(6-Cy).12 It was shown by UV-vis spectroscopy and circular
dichroism (CD) that the sparingly soluble 1@2(6-Cy)
complex experienced strong noncovalent interactions be-
tween guest and host, even in dilute solution.12 This should
also be the case for the solid complex itself. Diazirines13 are
convenient and popular precursors of carbenes. Upon photo-
chemical or thermal activation, they react readily with
hydroxyl groups to form ethers.14 Some years ago, we began
to investigate the reaction behavior of these carbene precur-
sors entrapped within the cavities of 7-Cy’s and found
markedly different carbene selectivities.15 With this back-
ground, the 1@2(6-Cy) system seemed very promising to
test the supramolecular approach to monofunctionalization
as outlined above.
Table 1. Product Distributions (mol percent) Obtained After
Photolysis in the Solid State and in Aqueous Solution by
Quantitative GC and RP-HPLC
photolysis of 1@2(6-Cy)
solid state
aqueous solutiona
2
3
4
5
39
18
31
9
15
9
13
2
6
1
1
55
1
2-ethoxyadamantane
a Clear solution of 1 (7.0 × 10-4 M) and 6-Cy (5.7 × 10-3 M) in water
and 0.7% v/v ethanol; under this condition >90% of 1 is present as 1@2(6-
Cy) as verified by UV-vis and CD spectroscopy.
and 11% yield (based on 1), respectively. The total recovery
of cyclodextrins amounted to ca. 90%.16
The structure of the 2-adamantyl-substituted cyclodextrins
was established by homo- and heteronuclear 2D NMR
spectroscopy in water-d2. The linkage positions were deter-
mined from pulsed field gradient enhanced HMBC spectra.
The major isomer shows cross-peaks over three bonds
between the H-3′ of one glucose unit and the C-2 of the
adamantane moiety and between the corresponding glucose
C-3′ and adamantane H-2 signals, respectively. In addition,
Photolysis of 1@2(6-Cy) in the solid state was performed
at 20-30 °C under reduced pressure of argon for 6 h
(Scheme 2).16 Subsequent liquid-liquid extraction gave the
product distribution shown in Table 1.
(10) (a) McAlpine, S. R.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 2750-2751. (b) Onozuka, S.; Kojima, M.; Hattori, K.; Toda, F. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1980, 53, 3221-3224. (c) Takahashi, K.; Hattori, K.; Toda,
F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 3331-3334. (d) Komiyama, M.; Hirai, H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 2018-2021.
(11) (a) Smith, S. H.; Forrest, S. M.; Williams, D. C.; Cabell, Jr. M. F.;
Acquavella, M. F.; Abelt, C. J. Carbohydr. Res. 1992, 230, 289-297. (b)
Abelt, C. J.; Lokey, J. S.; Smith, S. H. Carbohydr. Res. 1989, 192, 119-
130. (c) Abelt, C. J.; Pleier, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 2159-2162.
(12) Krois, D.; Brinker, U. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11627-
11632.
Scheme 2
(13) (a) Chemistry of Diazirines, Volumes I and II; Liu, M. T. H., Ed.;
CRC: Boca Raton, 1987. (b) Kupfer, R.; Rosenberg, M. G.; Brinker, U.
H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6647-6648.
(14) For reactions of carbenes with alcohols, see: Kirmse, W. In
AdVances in Carbene Chemistry, Volume I; Brinker, U. H., Ed.; JAI:
Greenwich, 1994; pp 1-57.
(15) (a) Brinker, U. H.; Buchkremer, R.; Kolodziejczyk, M.; Kupfer,
R.; Rosenberg, M.; Poliks, M. D.; Orlando, M.; Gross, M. L. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1344-1345. (b) Brinker, U. H.; Rosenberg, M. G.
In AdVances in Carbene Chemistry, Volume II; Brinker, U. H., Ed.; JAI:
Stamford, 1998; pp 29-44.
(16) 1@2(6-Cy)12 (1.08 g, content 96%, 0.49 mmol) was photolyzed
for 6 h at 20 °C under reduced pressure of argon using a medium-pressure
mercury lamp (Heraeus TQ718-Z4, 700 W, doped with FeI2). The solid
was dissolved in 300 mL of water and continuously extracted with
dichloromethane to remove all products of 1 which were not covalently
bound to 6-Cy. Their identification and quantification was accomplished
by GC (FID) by comparison with standard samples (see Table 1). After
the water was evaporated in vacuo, the residue (1.08 g) was dissolved in
the minimum amount of water-methanol (7/3) (ca. 35 mL). A small aliquot
(corresponding to ca. 5 mg) was diluted to give a water-methanol (6/4)
mixture and was analyzed by analytical RP-HPLC [HP-1090 instrument
equipped with the RI-detector HP1047 and the interface 35900E (Hewlett-
Packard) using a Nucleosil 100-5C18 5 µm column (4 × 290 mm, FZ
Seibersdorf)]; isocratic elution with 0.5 mL/min gave, by comparison with
standards, the quantified distribution of water-soluble products (Table 1).
Preparative RP-HPLC purification was accomplished [Pump AP-250-150
(Armen Instruments) equipped with a preparative differential refractometer
type 98100 (Knauer) using a Lichrospher RP18 7 µm column (50 × 220
mm, Merck)]; isocratic elution with water-methanol (7/3) (30 mL/min flow
at 37 bar) yielded 204 mg of 2 (34%) and 69 mg of 3 (11%). In addition,
704 mg of unsubstituted R-Cy’s (0.65 mmol) (eluted as first fraction) were
recovered which consisted of pure 6-Cy and 10-15% of oxidized 6-Cy as
shown by UV-vis; total recovery of 6-Cy was thus 89%.
Preparative reversed phase (RP) HPLC afforded three well-
separated fractions. After elution of unsubstituted R-cyclo-
dextrins, two monosubstituted isomers were collected in 34
(5) Khan, A. R.; Forgo, P.; Stine, K. J.; D’Souza, V. T. Chem. ReV.
1998, 98, 1977-1996.
(6) Fukudome, M.; Okabe, Y.; Yuan, D.-Q.; Fujita, K. Chem. Commun.
1999, 1045-1046.
(7) (a) Yuan, D.-Q.; Ohta, K.; Fujita, K. Chem. Commun. 1996, 821-
822. (b) van Dienst, E.; Snellink, B. H. M.; Piekartz, I. v.; Grote Gansey,
M. H. B.; Venema, F.; Feiters, M. C.; Nolte, R. J. M.; Engbersen, J. F. J.;
Reinhoudt, D. N. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 6537-6545.
(8) (a) Tian, S.; Forgo, P.; D’Souza, V. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
8309-8312. (b) Iwakura, Y.; Uno, K.; Toda, F.; Onozuka, S.; Hattori, K.;
Bender, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 4432-4434.
(9) (a) Fujita, K.; Nagamura, S.; Imoto, T.; Tahara, T.; Koga, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3233-3235. (b) Fujita, K.; Tahara, T.; Imoto, T.;
Koga, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 2030-2034.
316
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 3, 2000