Scheme 1
.
Schematic Illustration of Synthetic Strategies for
Sesquiterpene-Like Small Molecules
a
Figure 1. Naturally occurring sesquiterpenes, artemisinin (1) and
transtaganolide D (2). The common skeleton is highlighted in bold.
we describe the development of a synthetic process entailing
7
generation of skeletal and stereochemical diversity of the
tricyclic systems.
To access varied molecular architectures in a systematic
fashion, we envisioned stereochemical diversification of ring-
junctions of the tricyclic system into three types involving
cis-cis, trans-cis, and trans-trans fused skeletons (Scheme
1). The collections of precursors having distinct functional
groups at three sites (A-C) with requisite stereochemical
variations (syn-syn, anti-syn, and anti-anti) would be syn-
thesized by assembly of three building blocks into consecutive
carbon centers of a six-membered ring. Reliable and robust
cyclization reactions must be employed for the paring of the
functionalities at the three sites to override the stereochemical
bias of the substrates. To this end, we planned tandem ring-
a
Systematic stereochemical alterations of ring-junctions were devised
to generate three-dimensional structural diversity.
10
group by adapting Fleming’s protocol. Subsequent alkylation
of the resulting C-magnesiated nitrile would proceed with
8
retention of configuration to afford a product having R
groups installed with high levels of stereoselectivities. Either
alkylation of the secondary alcohol or introduction of a R group
having a terminal olefin as a Grignard reagent at site A would
construct syn or anti stereochemical relationships with the
acetylene group at site B. Likewise, introduction of an olefin
1
-R
3
closing olefin metathesis reactions of dienynes leading to
tricyclic systems with concomitant incorporation of diene
functionalities into the skeletons. The collection of the resultant
tricycles would be a useful platform for incorporation of
heteroatom functionalities leading to small molecule collections
reminiscent of naturally occurring sesquiterpenes with high
oxidation levels.
1
3
group as the R group or manipulation of the nitrile group would
establish requisite stereochemical relationships between sites
B and C. In addition to stereochemical diversification, we
planned to generate skeletal diversity by controlling the modes
of dienyne cyclizations leading to products with distinct cyclic
arrays. Since olefin substitution can alter the site of initial
With our goal toward the rapid and stereocontrolled assembly
of building blocks, six-membered oxonitrile 3 was designed as
a versatile scaffold for installing the dienynes on the three sites
9
(
A-C) (Scheme 2). Addition of a R
1
group to the carbonyl
group would produce a hydroxylalkenenitrile that allows
chelation-controlled conjugate additions of acetylides as the R
11
ruthenium carbene complex formation, the tandem ring-
2
closure of dienyne with sterically differentiated olefins would
proceed via cyclization from sites A to B followed by B to C
leading to a tricyclic diene, whereas a reversed substitution
(
6) (a) Boldi, A. M. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 281–286. (b)
Wender, P. A.; Verma, V. A.; Paxton, T. J.; Pillow, T. H. Acc. Chem. Res.
008, 41, 40–49. (c) H u¨ bel, K.; Lebmann, T.; Waldmann, H. Chem. Soc.
ReV. 2008, 37, 1361–1374.
7) Recent reviews for diversity-oriented synthesis, see: (a) Burke, M. D.;
2
(10) Fleming, F. F.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, G.; Steward, O. W. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 1430–1435.
(
Schreiber, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 46–58. (b) Arya, P.;
Joseph, R.; Gan, Z.; Rakic, B. Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 163–180. (c) Tan,
D. S. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005, 1, 74–84. (d) Nielsen, T. E.; Schreiber, S. L.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 48–56. (e) Spandl, R. J.; Bender, A.;
Spring, D. R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 1149–1158.
(11) For selected examples of synthesis of polycyclic systems by tandem
metathesis of dienynes, see: (a) Kim, S.-H.; Zuercher, W. J.; Bowden, N. B.;
Grubbs, R. H. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1073–1081. (b) Codesido, E. M.;
Castedo, L.; Granja, J. R. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1483–1486. (c) Shimizu, K.;
Takimoto, M.; Mori, M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2323–2325. (d) Honda, T.;
Namiki, H.; Kaneda, K.; Mizutani, H. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 87–89. (e) Boyer,
F.-D.; Hanna, I.; Ricard, L. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1817–1820. (f) Garcia-
Fandino, R.; Codesido, E. M.; Sobarzo-Sanchez, E.; Castedo, L.; Granja,
J. R. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 193–196. (g) Gonzalez, A.; Dominguez, G.; Castells,
J. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 7267–7270.
(
8) For recent reviews, see: (a) Mori, M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349,
1
(
21–135. (b) Hansen, E. C.; Lee, D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 509–519.
c) Diver, S. T.; Giessert, A. J. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 1317–1382.
9) Generation of skeletal diversity employing a scaffold with three
reactive sites, see: Oguri, H.; Schreiber, S. L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 47–50.
(
602
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 3, 2009