H.-G. Park et al. / Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 509 (2011) 9–15
15
rate. A new peak appeared in the chromatogram, assuming the puta-
tive lanosterol oxidation product (Supplementary Fig. 8A). But, the
identification of the product mass was failed due to no ionization
in LC-mass spectrometry. The rate of oxidation of lanosterol based
on this HPLC analysis was estimated with assuming the new peak
as the lanosterol oxidation product. The calculated kcat value was
& Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (A084005), and by National
Institutes of Health Grant GM25515 to P.R.O.M.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
approximately 0.19 minꢃ1 with a Km value of 20
lM for the wild-
type CYP51F1 enzyme (Supplementary Fig. 8B). In addition, the
putative oxidation product peak disappeared when the lanosterol
oxidation reaction was performed with azole compounds, suggest-
ing that the oxidation activity of purified enzyme was inhibited by
azole drugs (Supplementary Fig. 8A).
Site-specific mutations in the CYP51F1 gene have been consid-
ered as one of the main mechanisms for azole resistance in clini-
cally isolated C. albicans strains. So far, about 140 mutations have
been reported in the literature, but few of them have been specif-
ically associated with azole resistance [34]. Multiple mechanisms
of resistance have been proposed, including a reduction of intracel-
lular azole concentration or an increased CYP51 expression [14].
Changes in CYP51F1 expression have been detected in resistant
strains, but their role in resistance is unclear.
References
[1] F.P. Guengerich, Z. Tang, S.G. Salamanca-Pinzon, Q. Cheng, Mol. Interv. 10
(2010) 153–163.
[2] P.R. Ortiz de Montellano, In: P.R. Ortiz de Montellano (Ed.), Cytochrome P450:
Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry, Plenum Press, New York, 2005.
[3] D.R. Nelson, L. Koymans, T. Kamataki, J.J. Stegeman, R. Feyereisen, D.J.
Waxman, M.R. Waterman, O. Gotoh, M.J. Coon, R.W. Estabrook, I.C. Gunsalus,
D.W. Nebert, Pharmacogenetics 6 (1996) 1–42.
[4] C. dEnfert, S. Goyard, S. Rodriguez-Arnaveilhe, L. Frangeul, L. Jones, F. Tekaia, O.
Bader, A. Albrecht, L. Castillo, A. Dominguez, J.F. Ernst, C. Fradin, C. Gaillardin, S.
Garcia-Sanchez, P. de Groot, B. Hube, F.M. Klis, S. Krishnamurthy, D. Kunze,
M.C. Lopez, A. Mavor, N. Martin, I. Moszer, D. Onesime, J. Perez Martin, R.
Sentandreu, E. Valentin, A.J. Brown, Nucleic Acids Res. 33 (2005) D353–D357.
[5] F.C. Odds, Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 15 (1987) 1–5.
[6] M.L. Pendrak, M.P. Chao, S.S. Yan, D.D. Roberts, J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 3426–
3433.
Based on a homology model of C. albicans CYP51F1, we postu-
late that Tyr132 in the BC loop is located close to the heme in
the active site (Fig. 7) and mutations of this residue are likely to
modify the active site architecture and heme environment. Kudo
et al. [35] reported that an Y132H substitution modified the heme
environment but fluconazole resistance was predominantly associ-
ated with the double Y132H/F145L mutations. Unusual spectra
were obtained on binding of lanosterol or azole drugs to the
Y132H mutant in this study. This observation suggests that modi-
fication of the heme environment by the substitution Y132H may
be a prerequisite for the effective resistance to azole drugs con-
ferred by multiple mutations.
[7] P.L. Fidel, Jr., 2002. Oral Dis. 8 (Suppl. 2), 69–75.
[8] B.J. Kullberg, A.M. Oude Lashof, Eur. J. Med. Res. 7 (2002) 183–191.
[9] R. Calderone, F.C. Odds, T. Boekhout, FEMS Yeast Res. 9 (2009) 971–972.
[10] G.I. Lepesheva, T.Y. Hargrove, Y. Kleshchenko, W.D. Nes, F. Villalta, M.R.
Waterman, Lipids 43 (2008) 1117–1125.
[11] N. Strushkevich, S.A. Usanov, H.W. Park, J. Mol. Biol. 397 (2010)
1067–1078.
[12] Y. Koltin, C.A. Hitchcock, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1 (1997) 176–182.
[13] N.H. Georgopapadakou, T.J. Walsh, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40 (1996)
279–291.
[14] S.L. Kelly, D.E. Kelly, C.J. Jackson, A.G.S. Warrilow, D.C. Lamb, In: P.R. Ortiz de
Montellano (Ed.), Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry,
Plenum Press, New York, 2005, pp. 585–617.
[15] P. Marichal, L. Koymans, S. Willemsens, D. Bellens, P. Verhasselt, W. Luyten, M.
Borgers, F.C. Ramaekers, F.C. Odds, Microbiology 145 (Pt 10) (1999) 2701–
2713.
Interestingly, our study indicated that the azole resistance ob-
served in clinical isolates of C. albicans does not necessarily result
only from a lowering of the azole binding affinity of CYP51F1. Thus,
at least the four purified mutant enzymes in this study did not show
a direct correlation between azole affinity and resistance. Recently,
Warrilow et al. [36] also reported that the azole resistance conferred
by a I471T mutation of CYP51F1 is not due to significantly alteration
of the enzyme’s affinity for azole compounds. They postulated that
the increased resistance to azoles conferred by the I471T substitu-
tion reflected an enhanced ability of the I471T mutant to remain
functionally active at high azole concentrations [36]. Therefore,
the mutant enzymes may acquire azole resistance through a combi-
nation of mechanisms, not simply by a decreased azole binding
affinity. However, C. albicans mutant CYP51F1 enzymes may pro-
duce enough ergosterol to maintain cell viability, even if at a very
low rate of turnover, despite the presence of a high azole concentra-
tion. Measurements of the amount of lanosterol produced by puri-
fied mutant enzymes in the presence of high concentrations of
azole drugs may provide a clue relative to this postulated mecha-
nism of azole resistance and is currently under investigation.
In conclusion, we have overexpressed, purified, and character-
ized a critical P450 enzyme from the pathogenic fungus C. albicans.
The purified CYP51F1 catalyzes lanosterol demethylation and,
interestingly, four of its mutants from azole-resistant strains retain
essentially unchanged binding affinities for azole drugs. Structure–
function studies of this C. albicans CYP51F1 enzyme will provide the
basis for the improved design of azole drugs against this pathogen.
[16] D. Sanglard, F. Ischer, M. Monod, Microbiology 143 (Pt 2) (1997) 405–416.
[17] R. Franz, S.L. Kelly, D.C. Lamb, D.E. Kelly, M. Ruhnke, J. Morschhauser,
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42 (1998) 3065–3072.
[18] I.H. Hanna, J.F. Teiber, K.L. Kokones, P.F. Hollenberg, Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
350 (1998) 324–332.
[19] D. Kim, F.P. Guengerich, Biochemistry 43 (2004) 981–988.
[20] D. Kim, E.T. Yukl, P. Moenne-Loccoz, P.R. Ortiz De Montellano, Biochemistry 45
(2006) 14772–14780.
[21] T. Ohama, T. Suzuki, M. Mori, S. Osawa, T. Ueda, K. Watanabe, T. Nakase,
Nucleic Acids Res. 21 (1993) 4039–4045.
[22] D. Kim, Z.L. Wu, F.P. Guengerich, J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 40319–40327.
[23] C.-H. Yun, G.P. Miller, F.P. Guengerich, Biochemistry 39 (2000)
11319–11329.
[24] C.H. Yun, K.H. Kim, M.W. Calcutt, F.P. Guengerich, J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005)
12279–12291.
[25] J.B. Schenkman, H. Remmer, R.W. Estabrook, Mol. Pharmacol. 3 (1967) 113–
123.
[26] F.P. Guengerich, in: A.W. Hayes (Ed.), Principles and Methods of Toxicology,
Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, 2001, pp. 1625–1687.
[27] X. He, M.J. Cryle, J.J. De Voss, J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 22697–22705.
[28] C. Notredame, D.G. Higgins, J. Heringa, J. Mol. Biol. 302 (2000)
205–217.
[29] M.A. Correia, P.R. Ortiz de Montellano, In: Ortiz de Montellano, P.R. (Ed.),
Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry, Plenum Press,
New York, 2005, pp. 247–322.
[30] D. Kim, M.J. Cryle, J.J. De Voss, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 464 (2007) 213–220.
[31] H.G. Park, Y.R. Lim, C.Y. Eun, S. Han, J.S. Han, K.S. Cho, Y.J. Chun, D. Kim,
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 396 (2010) 534–538.
[32] E.R. Trösken, E. Straube, W.K. Lutz, W. Völkel, C. Patten, J. Am. Soc. Mass.
Spectrom. 15 (2004) 1216–1221.
[33] J. Acimovic, A. Lövgren-Sandblom, K. Monostory, D. Rozman, M. Golicnik, D.
Lutjohann, I. Björkhem, J. Chromatog. B 877 (2009) 2081–2086.
[34] F. Morio, C. Loge, B. Besse, C. Hennequin, P. Le, Pape, Diagn. Microbiol. Infect.
Dis. 66 (2010) 373–384.
[35] M. Kudo, M. Ohi, Y. Aoyama, Y. Nitahara, S.K. Chung, Y. Yoshida, J. Biochem.
137 (2005) 625–632.
[36] A.G. Warrilow, C.M. Martel, J.E. Parker, N. Melo, D.C. Lamb, W.D. Nes, D.E. Kelly,
S.L. Kelly, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54 (2010) 4235–4245.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a grant to D.K. from the Korea
Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare