Organic Letters
Letter
a
a
Scheme 3. Scope of Cycloketone Oxime Esters (2)
Scheme 4. Scope of Boronic Acids (3)
a
Conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.4 mmol), 3a (0.4 mmol),
Cu(CH3CN)4BF4 (10 mol %), dtbbpy (10 mol %), K3PO4 (0.4
mmol), CH3CN (2 mL), rt, 0.1 MPa N2, irradiation using a 15 W
blue LED, 12 h.
a
Conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), 3 (0.4 mmol),
Cu(CH3CN)4BF4 (10 mol %), dtbbpy (10 mol %), K3PO4 (0.4
mmol), CH3CN (2 mL), rt, 0.1 MPa N2, irradiation using a 15 W
blue LED, 12 h.
substituted cyclobutanone oxime ester (2b) underwent the
reaction smoothly to give the target product 5a in 56% yield
with d.r. = 56/44. 3-(4-tert-Butyl) and 3-(4-chloro)-substituted
phenyl, 3-benzyl, and 3-alkyl-bearing cyclobutanone oxime
esters reacted similarly to form 5b−5e (50−58%), respectively.
Increased steric hindrance led to lowered yields for 5b (50%)
and 5e (50%). 3-Methyl-3-phenyl disubstituted oxime ester
(2g) further increased the steric hindrance to execute the
formation of 5f in a moderate yield (45%). However, 2-alkyl
substituents such as methyl, ethyl, and butyl in 2 enhanced the
yields of products 5g−5i to 62−68% in comparison to the 3-
substituent-bearing cases, which is attributed to the stabiliza-
tion of 2-alkyls to the in situ generated cyanoalkyl radicals that
initiate the annulation process. 2-Benzyl exhibited a negative
steric effect on the formation of 5j (56%). It should be noted
that cyclopentanone- and cyclohexanone-derived oxime esters
2l and 2m and the corresponding acyclic oxime ester of 5-
methyl-2-hexanone (2n) could not undergo the same type of
radical cross-coupling reactions under the stated conditions,
and the desired products 5k−5m were not produced.
Finally, the scope of boronic acids (3) was extended by
treating them with 1a and 2a (Scheme 4). Obvious steric and
electronic effects were observed from arylboronic acids. The
electron-donating substituents such as methoxy, methyl,
benzyloxy, and tert-butyl facilitated the reaction to form the
target products 6a−6g (60−77%) with diastereoselectivity
from 93/7 to 95/5, while the phenyl group and electron-
withdrawing substituents acetyl, fluoro, and chloro reduced the
yields of products 6h−6k (40−62%). The steric effect was
obvious in the cases of using 2- methoxy and 3,5-
dimethylphenylboronic acids and 2-naphthyl boronic acid,
leading to 6a (60%), 6l (60%), and 6m (63%), respectively, as
compared with the formation of 6b (70%)/6d (77%), 6c
(70%), and 4a (76%). It is noteworthy that vinylboronic acids
such as 1-pentenyl and 2-cyclohexylvinyl boronic acids also
effectively participated in the reaction, affording products 6n
and 6o in moderate yields (43−50%) with tolerance of a
carbon−carbon double bond under the stated conditions.
However, heteroaryl boronic acids such as 2-thienyl and 2-furyl
boronic acids only reacted to afford trace amounts of the target
products, and 2-alkylboronic acids could not react under the
same conditions.
To demonstrate the applicability of the synthetic protocol,
various transformations of product 4a were performed
(Scheme 5). With m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (m-CPBA) as
a
Scheme 5. Derivatizations of Thiophene Product 4a
a
Conditions: (a) 4a (0.2 mmol), m-CPBA (0.6 mmol), CH2Cl2 (2
mL), rt, 1.5 h; (b) 4a (0.2 mmol), NaBH4 (0.2 mmol), MeOH (2
mL), rt, 10 h.
the oxidant 4a was readily converted to the corresponding
sulfone 7 (91%) through oxidation of the phenylthio group.
The ketone carbonyl of 4a was selectively reduced to hydroxyl
(85%) by means of NaBH4 as the reductant with the tolerance
of a cyano group.
Control experiments were conducted to probe into the
reaction mechanism. Addition of 2 equiv of a radical scavenger,
that is, 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT), into the
reaction system of 1a, 2a, and 3a under the standard
conditions obviously diminished the yield of 4a to 32%,
while use of 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO)
completely inhibited the reaction. The radical-trapping product
TEMPO-(CH2)3CN (9) was detected in the reaction mixture
C
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX