N. Ra6asio et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 3943–3945
3945
anone and trans-dihydrocarvone the carbonyl group
and the methyl substituent are totally eclipsed.
(8 ml) and the solution transferred, under H
2
into a
glass reaction vessel where the catalyst (0.1 g for entries
–7; 0.05 g for entries 8 and 9) had been previously
1
reduced. Reactions were carried out at 90 or 60°C at
atmospheric pressure with magnetic stirring. Reaction
mixtures were analyzed by GC (mesitylene as internal
standard). After completion the catalyst was filtered
off, the solvent removed under reduced pressure and
Total chemoselectivity towards formation of the unsat-
urated alcohol was observed in the hydrogenation of
cis-dihydrocarvone. However, 2-PrOH was the solvent
of choice in order to avoid acid-catalyzed side reactions
9
already observed with this substrate.
1
the equatorial/axial ratio evaluated by H NMR spec-
troscopy. Recycling tests were performed starting from
The advantages of using Cu/SiO2 instead of metal
hydrides are quite evident. Thus, the latter are used in
more than stoichiometric amounts, require time-con-
suming work-up procedures, produce a large amount of
inorganic wastes and do not allow tuning of the
configuration of the products. Moreover, this copper
catalyst would be competitive also with Raney Ni that
usually requires vigorous conditions unless large
0
.4 g of substrate, washing the catalyst recovered with
diethylether and reactivating it by hydrogenation before
use. Isolated yields were determined on a 0.5 g scale
experiment. HyperChem Release 5.0 for Windows was
®
used for molecular mechanics calculations.
Acknowledgements
2
,3,10
amounts of catalyst are used.
Furthermore, safety
and environmental concerns claim for the use of this
catalyst. We can suggest Cu/SiO as an efficient alterna-
tive to metal hydrides and conventional copper and
nickel catalysts.
2
The authors gratefully thank the CNR-MIUR for
financial support through the ‘Program Chemistry
LAW 95/95-III year’
Catalyst preparation: the catalyst was prepared as
5
2+
already reported starting from a Cu(NH )
solution
References
3
4
obtained using Cu(NO ) ·3H O as the precursor, but
3
2
2
using a porous silica from Grace Davison (BET=320
1. Capka, M.; Chvalovsky, V.; Kochloefl, K.; Kraus, M.
Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1969, 34, 118–124.
2
m /g, PV=1.75 ml/g) as the support. In this way 8%
2
2. Augustine, R. L. Heterogeneous Catalysis for the Syn-
Cu samples (BET=263 m /g, PV=0.78 ml/g), were
thetic Chemist; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1996; pp.
obtained. The catalyst was reduced at 270°C with H at
2
4
39–472.
. Killen Macbeth, A.; Millis, J. A. J. Chem. Soc. 1945,
09–712.
. Mitsui, S.; Saito, H.; Yamashita, Y.; Kaminaga, M.;
Senda, Y. Tetrahedron 1973, 29, 1531–1539.
. Ravasio, N.; Antenori, M.; Gargano, M.; Mastrorilli, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3529–3532.
. Ravasio, N.; Rossi, M. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 4329–
atmospheric pressure, removing the water formed under
reduced pressure, before the hydrogenation reaction.
Very similar results were obtained using Degussa
3
4
5
6
7
7
Aerosil 380 or another gel from Grace Davison (BET=
2
6
00 m /g, PV=0.99 ml/g) as the catalyst support.
Experimental conditions: The substrates (100 mg) were
dissolved in toluene or n-heptane dried over siliporites
4333.
. Ravasio, N.; Psaro, R.; Recchia, S.; Zaccheria, F. In
Catalysis of Organic Reactions, Chem. Ind. Series: Marcel
Dekker, submitted.
8
9
. Tanaka, K.; Takagi, Y.; Nomura, O.; Kobayashi, I. J.
Catal. 1974, 35, 24–33.
. Ravasio, N.; Leo, V.; Babudri, F.; Gargano, M. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1997, 38, 7103–7106.
10. Rylander, P. N. Hydrogenation Methods; Academic
Press: Orlando, 1985; pp. 66–77.
Scheme 1.