34
W. Pu et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 169 (2016) 30–37
are a short conjugation chain and electron-donating N and O atoms in
oxadiazole ring, which increases N(2)'s coordination affinity.
N\\Cu\\N bite angle of [Cu(PYO)(PPh
ature values [15,18]. While, its P\\Cu\\P bite angle is larger than litera-
ture values (~120°), suggesting that PPh ligand is distorting itself to
3 2 4
) ]BF is comparable to liter-
3
satisfy inner-molecular π stacking. For most bond angles listed in
Table 1, they are close to but not exactly equal to 109°, indicating a
structural distortion in [Cu(PYO)(PPh ) ]BF triggered by its heteroge-
3 2 4
neous ligands. Such structural distortion should be restricted since it in-
creases non-radiative decay probability and decreases energy content of
MLCT excited state [14,19,20]. With the help of inner-molecular π stack-
ing and the large steric hindrance of conjugation plane in PYO ligand,
structural relaxation in [Cu(PYO)(PPh
ed, showing promising emissive performance. Electronic structure of
Cu(PYO)(PPh ]BF is analyzed through its DFT calculation, which
3 2 4
) ]BF may be effectively restrict-
[
3
)
2
4
confirms its MLCT/LLCT excitation nature. See Supporting Information
for a detailed explanation.
3
3 2 4
.2. Morphology analysis on [Cu(PYO)(PPh ) ]BF /PVP composite fibers
Fig. 3. Solid state diffuse reflection spectrum (ref.) of bulk [Cu(PYO)(PPh
absorption (abs.) spectra of pure PVP, [Cu(PYO)(PPh ]BF (in CH Cl , 2 μM) and the
four composite samples. Inset: UV-Vis absorption spectra of PYO and PPh in CH Cl
2 μM).
3 2 4
) ]BF , UV-Vis
3
)
2
4
2
2
Although the electron-pulling oxadiazole and its steric hindrance in
PYO ligand may improve [Cu(PYO)(PPh ]BF emissive performance
3
2
2
(
)
3 2
4
by restricting its structural relaxation, we still have to figure out another
way to further restrict its structural relaxation. In this effort,
3
a new one and different from absorption spectra of PPh and TP ligands.
[
Cu(PYO)(PPh
3
)
2
]BF
4
is immobilized in a polymer matrix through
It is tentatively attributed to electronic absorption of MLCT, as suggested
by above DFT calculation result. This MLCT transition energy and corre-
sponding absorption edge (450 nm) are found much higher than those
of other [Cu(N\\N)(P\\P)] complexes. We attribute its causation to the
electron-pulling effect of PYO ligand and its short conjugation chain
[18–20].
As for PVP, there are three π → π* absorption bands peaking at
260 nm, 300 nm and 350 nm, respectively. These bands are traced in
all absorption spectra of our composite samples, with no obvious spec-
tral shift. There is a broad absorption band ranging from 350 nm to
490 nm in each composite absorption spectrum, which can be attribut-
electrospinning technique, hoping to minimize its structural relaxation
through polymer rigid framework. Owing to its virtues of controllable
morphology, proper mechanical strength and compatibility with vari-
ous dopants, PVP is here selected as supporting matrix [14]. Aiming at
a full comparison between bulk sample and PVP-based fibrous samples,
various doping levels are tried, including 7 wt%, 9 wt%,11 wt% and
1
3 wt%, respectively.
These PVP-based fibrous samples and their morphology are firstly
evaluated through their SEM images, as shown in Fig. 2. For all samples,
their fibers are randomly distributed on substrates with smooth surface
and uniform morphology. There are no branch structures or knots in
these fibers. They align cross each other, resulting in a porous structure
with its surface-area-to-volume ratio two orders of magnitude higher
than those of bulk materials [14]. Since there are no heterogeneous in-
terface or phase separation, it is tentatively concluded that
ed to MLCT absorption of [Cu(PYO)(PPh
found enhanced in PVP composite samples, compared to that of
[Cu(PYO)(PPh ]BF in CH Cl solution, along with a slight red shift.
This result confirms that [Cu(PYO)(PPh ]BF MLCT excited state is
3 2 4
) ]BF dopant. This MLT band is
3
)
2
4
2
2
3
)
2
4
vulnerable to surrounding environment, which is consistent with liter-
ature reports [19,20]. Despite of their different absorption intensity
values, absorption wavelength and band shape of our composite sam-
[
3 2 4
Cu(PYO)(PPh ) ]BF molecules have been successfully and uniformly
doped into PVP matrix with good compatibility with it. Mean diameters
of these composite fibers are determined as ~0.9 μm and similar to each
other. Dopant concentration variation has slim effect on sample diame-
ter or morphology, which should be explained by the low doping con-
centrations in PVP matrix. Fig. 2 gives a fluorescence microscopy
image of a representative sample (13 wt% doped). Under Hg lamp exci-
tation, homogeneous green emission comes out from all fibers, further
ples are similar to those of [Cu(PYO)(PPh
without any new absorption bands. We thus come to a conclusion
that [Cu(PYO)(PPh ]BF dopant is simply immobilized in PVP frame-
3 2 4 2 2
) ]BF in CH Cl solution,
)
3 2
4
work, with its excited state well protected by PVP framework. There is
no strong interaction between dopant molecules and PVP matrix.
3 2 4
Since bulk [Cu(PYO)(PPh ) ]BF sample is too thick for light pene-
confirming that [Cu(PYO)(PPh
distributed in PVP matrix with no phase separation or condensed
aggregation.
3
)
2
]BF
4
molecules have been uniformly
tration, we here use its solid state diffuse reflection (ref.) spectrum to
replace its absorption spectrum. This reflection spectrum has two low
reflection regions peaking at 283 nm and 427 nm, respectively, ending
at 458 nm. These two regions are consistent with the strong absorption
3
.3. Photophysical comparison between bulk [Cu(PYO)(PPh
3
)
2
]BF
4
and
bands of [Cu(PYO)(PPh
ples. The slight red shift in this reflection spectrum, compared to ab-
sorption spectrum of [Cu(PYO)(PPh ]BF in CH Cl solution, should
3 2 4 2 2
) ]BF in CH Cl solution and composite sam-
[Cu(PYO)(PPh ]BF /PVP
)
3 2
4
3
)
2
4
2
2
3
.3.1. UV-Vis absorption and solid state diffuse reflection spectra
UV–Vis absorption (abs.) spectra of pure PVP, [Cu(PYO)(PPh
in CH Cl , 2 μM) and the four composite samples are shown in Fig. 3.
In solution, [Cu(PYO)(PPh ]BF has two strong absorption bands,
be attributed to solid state aggregation. In this case, it is further con-
firmed that PVP matrix only immobilizes and protects
) ]BF
3 2 4
(
2
2
[Cu(PYO)(PPh
transition.
3 2 4
) ]BF molecules, without changing its electronic
3
)
2
4
peaking at 233 nm and 270 nm, respectively. There is still a broad ab-
sorption band ranging from 350 nm to 450 nm. The first strong absorp-
3.3.2. Emission spectra
Emission (em.) spectra of [Cu(PYO)(PPh
bulk [Cu(PYO)(PPh ]BF and the four composite samples are shown
in Fig. 4. In solution, [Cu(PYO)(PPh ]BF shows a broad and weak
tion band is quite similar to PPh
π → π* absorption of PPh , as shown by Fig. 3 inset. The second strong
absorption band is considered as an absorption conduct of PPh and
3
absorption and thus attributed to
3 2 4 2 2
) ]BF (in CH Cl , 2 μM),
3
)
3 2
4
3
3
)
2
4
PYO ligands. This assignment is consistent with their LLCT nature, as
suggested by above DFT calculation result. The weak band, however, is
emission band peaking at 580 nm with FWHM of 76 nm, where
FWHM means full width at half maximum. There are no vibronic