Organic Process Research & Development 2010, 14, 1347–1357
Overcoming the Challenges of Solid Bridging and Constriction during Pd-Catalyzed
C-N Bond Formation in Microreactors
†
‡
†
,‡
,†
Ryan L. Hartman, John R. Naber, Nikolay Zaborenko, Stephen L. Buchwald,* and Klavs F. Jensen*
Department of Chemical Engineering, and Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts
AVenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Abstract:
to overcome this challenge are necessary to apply microsystems
to a wider range of reaction discovery and process optimization.
A number of creative strategies have been employed to
handle solids in both microreactors and simple microfluidic
systems. While immobilization of the particles (e.g., catalyst
or solid-supported reagent) can minimize the risk of micro-
We investigate the mechanisms that govern plugging in microre-
actors during Pd-catalyzed amination reactions. Both bridging and
constriction were shown to be important mechanisms that lead to
clogging in our system and greatly limited the utility of microsys-
tems for this class of reactions. On the basis of these observations,
several approaches were engineered to overcome the challenge of
plugging and to enable the continuous-flow synthesis of a biary-
lamine. Bridging could be eliminated with acoustic irradiation
while constriction was managed via fluid velocity and the predic-
tion of growth rates.
17-20,27
channel clogging,
regenerating a packed bed necessitates
the removal and/or recharging of such immobilized solids. The
31-34
synthesis of nanoparticles
can mitigate clogging caused by
flow-induced bridging but can lead to retention and build-up
when the particles interact with the surfaces of the system.
Another approach is to use multiphase liquid-liquid flow to
prevent particles from interacting with the walls of the micro-
1
. Introduction
21,23,28
channels. Encapsulating particles in droplets
or establishing
The problem handling of solids in microfluidic systems has
30
annular-type flow not only limits the interactions between the
particles and walls but also constrains particle-to-particle
interactions that may lead to clogging. However, these special-
ized systems often require the use of solvents that can be
incompatible with certain reagents or can lead to changes in
the efficiency of many organic reactions. Noninvasive ap-
proaches such as flow focusing and filtration have proven to
gained considerable attention in recent years as many interesting
applications, from the manipulation of biological materials to
a wide range of organic chemistry reactions, involve hetero-
geneous mixtures. For example, many important reactions in
the synthesis of fine chemicals, including active pharmaceutical
ingredients (APIs), require more than one phase, be it gas and
liquid, liquid and liquid, or solid and liquid. Microreactors
have been widely applied in research to advance a deeper
understanding of the physical and chemical rate processes that
1
-3
(16) Jensen, K. F. In New AVenues to Efficient Chemical Synthesis:
Emerging Technologies; Seeberger, P. H., Blume, T., Eds.; Springer-
Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007; p 5776.
(17) Haswell, S. J.; O’Sullivan, B.; Styring, P. Lab Chip 2001, 1, 164–
166.
4-16
govern reactions,
has been relatively limited.
to clogging in microsystems and the development of strategies
yet their use for reactions involving solids
17-33
Understanding why solids lead
(
18) Losey, M. W.; Schmidt, M. A.; Jensen, K. F. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
2
001, 40, 2555–2562.
(19) Baxendale, I. R.; Deeley, J.; Griffiths-Jones, C. M.; Ley, S. V.; Saaby,
*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kfjensen@mit.edu.
S.; Tranmer, G. K. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2566–2568.
Tel: +1 617 253-4589. Fax: +1 617 298-8992.
(20) Wiles, C.; Watts, P.; Haswell, S. J. Lab Chip 2007, 7, 322–330.
(21) Poe, S. L.; Cummings, M. A.; Haaf, M. R.; McQuade, D. T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1544–1548.
†
Department of Chemical Engineering.
Department of Chemistry.
‡
(
(
(
1) Roberge, D. M.; Ducry, L.; Bieler, N.; Cretton, P.; Zimmermann, B.
Chem. Eng. Technol. 2005, 28, 318–323.
(22) Kockmann, N.; Kastner, J.; Woias, P. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 135, S110–
S116.
(23) Song, H.; Chen, D. L.; Ismagilov, R. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 7336–7356.
(24) Horie, T.; Sumino, M.; Tanaka, T.; Matsushita, Y.; Ichimura, T.;
Yoshida, J. Org. Process Res. DeV. 2010, 14, 405–410.
(25) Conant, T.; Karim, A.; Rogers, S.; Samms, S.; Randolph, G.; Datye,
A. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2006, 61, 5678–5685.
(26) Li, W.; Pharn, H. H.; Nie, Z.; MacDonald, B.; Guenther, A.;
Kumacheva, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9935–9941.
(27) Kobayashi, J.; Mori, Y.; Okamoto, K.; Akiyama, R.; Ueno, M.;
Kitamori, T.; Kobayashi, S. Science 2004, 304, 1305–1308.
(28) Shestopalov, I.; Tice, J. D.; Ismagilov, R. F. Lab Chip 2004, 4, 316–
321.
(29) Trachsel, F.; Tidona, B.; Desportes, S.; Rudolf von Rohr, P. J.
Supercrit. Fluids 2009, 48, 146–153.
(30) Nagasawa, H.; Mae, K. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 2179–2186.
(31) Takagi, M.; Maki, T.; Miyahara, M.; Mae, K. Chem. Eng. J. 2004,
101, 269–276.
(32) Khan, S. A.; Jensen, K. F. AdV. Mater. 2007, 19, 2556.
(33) Khan, S. A.; Gunther, A.; Schmidt, M. A.; Jensen, K. F. Langmuir
2004, 20, 8604–8611.
(34) Yen, B. K. H.; Gunther, A.; Schmidt, M. A.; Jensen, K. F.; Bawendi,
M. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5447–5451.
2) Carey, J. S.; Laffan, D.; Thomson, C.; Williams, M. T. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2006, 4, 2337–2347.
3) Dugger, R. W.; Ragan, J. A.; Ripin, D. H. B. Org. Process Res. DeV.
2
005, 9, 253–258.
(
(
4) Jensen, K. F. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56, 293–303.
5) Fletcher, P. D. I.; Haswell, S. J.; Pombo-Villar, E.; Warrington, B. H.;
Watts, P.; Wong, S. Y. F.; Zhang, X. L. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 4735–
4
757.
(
(
6) Jahnisch, K.; Hessel, V.; Lowe, H.; Baerns, M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2004, 43, 406–446.
7) Pennemann, H.; Watts, P.; Haswell, S. J.; Hessel, V.; Lowe, H. Org.
Process Res. DeV. 2004, 8, 422–439.
(
(
8) Hessel, V.; Lowe, H. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2005, 28, 267–284.
9) Jensen, K. F. MRS Bull. 2006, 31, 101–107.
(
(
10) deMello, A. J. Nature 2006, 442, 394–402.
11) Mason, B. P.; Price, K. E.; Steinbacher, J. L.; Bogdan, A. R.; McQuade,
D. T. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 2300–2318.
(
(
(
(
12) Watts, P.; Wiles, C. Chem. Commun. 2007, 443–467.
13) Watts, P.; Wiles, C. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2007, 30, 329–333.
14) Hartman, R. L.; Jensen, K. F. Lab Chip 2009, 9, 2495–2507.
15) Ehrfeld, W.; Hessel, V.; Lowe, H. Microreactors: New Technology
for Modern Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2000.
1
0.1021/op100154d 2010 American Chemical Society
Vol. 14, No. 6, 2010 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
1347
Published on Web 09/10/2010