A series of ruthenium(IV)-µ-oxo bisporphyrins was
evaluated in the aerobic oxidation of cis-cyclooctene (Table
1). The reactions were carried out with 0.5 µmol of catalyst
gave reduced activity compared to [RuIV(TPP)OH]2O. The
substituent in the porphyrin ligand gave a noticeable effect on
the catalytic activity (entries 1, 8, and 10), with the most
electron-demanding system, namely [RuIV(4-CF3-TPP)OH]2O,
being the most efficient catalyst.
In a fashion similar to that described for cis-cyclooctene
epoxidation, the photocatalytic oxidations of a variety of
organic substrates were examined. Table 2 lists the oxidized
Table 1. Aerobic Photocatalytic Oxidation of cis-Cyclooctene
with Diruthenium(IV) µ-Oxo Porphyrinsa
entry
1
catalyst
solvent t/day
TONb, c
[RuIV(TPP)OH]2O 1a
CH3CN
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
220 ( 16
460 ( 40
640 ( 65
110 ( 18
140 ( 6
190 ( 10
340 ( 8
300 ( 35
70 ( 5
Table 2. Turnover Numbers for Alkenes and Benzylic C-H
Oxidations Using 1b as the Photocatalysta
2
3
4
CHCl3
C6H6
entry
substrate
product
TONb
norbornene oxidec
2-cyclohexenol
2-cyclohexenone
cyclohexe oxide
triphenylmethanol
diphenylmethanol
benzophenone
1-phenylethanol
acetophenone
200 ( 40
160 ( 14
350 ( 31
30 ( 3
1120 ( 48
820 ( 102
140 ( 18
380 ( 41
180 ( 19
2900 ( 140
3300 ( 240
3900 ( 280
THF
1
2
norbornene
cyclohexene
5d
6e
7
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
[RuIV(TPP)Cl]2O
8
[RuIV(4-CF3-TPP)OH]2O 1b CH3CN
CH3CN
250 ( 21
340 ( 9
190 ( 23
3
4
triphenylmethane
diphenylmethane
9e
10
[RuIV(4-MeOTPP)OH]2O 1c CH3CN
a The reaction was carried out in a Rayonet reactor, with 0.5 µmol of
catalyst in 5 mL of solvent containing 4 mmol of cis-cyclooctene. Oxygen-
saturated solutions were irradiated with visible light (λmax ) 420 nm) or
otherwise noted. Products were analyzed on an HP 5890 GC with a DB-5
capillary column employing an internal standard. b TON represents the total
number of moles of product produced per mole of catalyst. All reactions
were run three times, and the data reported are the averages with standard
deviation (1σ). c The major product was cis-cyclooctene oxide, detected in
>95% yield. d UV-vis light (λmax ) 350 nm). e 5 mg of anthracene was
added.
5
ethylbenzene
6d
7
xanthene
1-phenylethanol
9-xanthenol
9-xanthone
acetophenone
9-xanthone
8e
a Typically with 0.25 µmol of 1b in 5 mL of CH3CN containing 2-4
mmol of substrate and 5 mg of anthracene. b Determined for a 24 h
photolysis (λmax ) 420 nm). The values reported are the averages of 2-3
runs (1σ deviation). c >90% exo isomer. d One minor product was detected
by GC but not identified. e 48% product yield.
in 5 mL of oxygen-saturated solution containing 4 mmol of
cis-cyclooctene. After 24 h of photolysis with visible light
(λmax ) 420 nm), cis-cyclooctene oxide was obtained as the
only identifiable oxidation product (>95% by GC) with ca.
220 turnovers (abbreviated as TON representing moles of
product/mol of catalyst) of catalyst 1a (entry 1). The trend
in the TONs roughly paralleled irradiation times. Control
experiments showed that no epoxide was formed in the
absence of either the catalyst or light. The results cannot be
ascribed to the chemistry of singlet oxygen, which is
characterized by efficient “ene” reactions of alkenes.24 The
use of other solvents instead of CH3CN, or air as oxygen
source (data not shown), resulted in reduced TONs (entries
2-4). Catalyst degradation was a problem with higher-energy
light, but the use of UV irradiation increased catalytic activity
(entry 5). It is interesting to note that the catalytic activity
was enhanced by adding small amounts of anthracene (entries
6 and 9). Quite surprisingly, the axial ligand on the metal
had a significant effect, and the [RuIV(TPP)Cl]2O (entry 7)
products and corresponding TONs using the [RuIV(4-CF3-
TPP)OH]2O (1b) as the photocatalyst. The trend in the TONs
roughly parallels the substrate reactivity, and significant
activity was observed with up to 3900 TON. After 24 h
photolysis, norbornene was oxidized to norbornene oxide
(exo mainly) with 200 TON (entry 1). Cyclohexene, in
contrast, is susceptible to the allylic oxidation that gave
primarily 2-cyclohexenone and 2-cyclohexenol along with
minor epoxide (entry 2). This product distribution is no
different than those typically obtained from cofacial iron
porphyrin photocatalysts.7 Activated hydrocarbons including
triphenylmethane, diphenylmethane, ethylbenzene, and xan-
thenes were oxidized to the corresponding alcohols and/or
ketones from overoxidation with total TONs ranging from
560 to 2900 (entries 3-6). Noticeably, the oxidation of
secondary benzylic alcohols gave the highest catalytic
activities (entries 7 and 8). Competitive catalytic oxidation
of ethylbenzene and ethlybenzene-d10 revealed a kinetic
isotope effect (KIE) of kH/kD ) 4.8 ( 0.2 at 298 K, similar
to the KIE reported for the reaction of ethylbenzene with an
electron-deficient iron(IV)-oxo porphyrin radical cation
species.25 The observed KIE is larger than those observed
in autoxidation processes,26 suggesting a nonradical mech-
anism that involves the intermediacy of ruthenium(V)-oxo
species as postulated in Scheme 1.
(18) Ogliaro, F.; de Visser, S. P.; Groves, J. T.; Shaik, S. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2874–2878.
(19) Che, C.-M.; Huang, J.-S. Chem. Commun. 2009, 3996–4015.
(20) Sugimoto, H.; Higashi, T.; Mori, M.; Nagano, M.; Yoshida, Z.;
Ogoshi, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1982, 55, 822–828.
(21) Richman, R. M.; Peterson, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 5795–
5796.
(22) Collman, J. P.; Barnes, C. E.; Brothers, P. J.; Collins, T. J.; Ozawa,
T.; Gallucci, J. C.; Ibers, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 5151–5163.
(23) Che, C.-M.; Zhang, J.-L.; Zhang, R.; Huang, J.-S.; Lai, T.-S.; Tsui,
W.-M.; Zhou, X.-G.; Zhou, Z.-Y.; Zhu, N.; Chang, C. K. Chem.sEur. J.
2005, 11, 7040–7053.
(25) Pan, Z.; Zhang, R.; Newcomb, M. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006, 100,
524–532.
(26) Sawyer, D. T.; Kang, C.; Llobet, A.; Redman, C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 5817–5818.
(24) Kearns, D. R. Chem. ReV. 1971, 71, 395–427.
2248
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 10, 2010