9,10-Dehydroanthracene
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 118, No. 20, 1996 4897
amounts of the analytes. The derived sensitivity factors were used to
convert integrated peak areas into true product ratios. For the
9-methoxyanthracene and 9-ethoxyanthracene versus anthracene or
2-methylanthracene, the GC/MS peak areas were calibrated against 1H
NMR integrations. Because of the trace, <0.5%, contamination of 2b
by anthracene photodimer, a small correction is included in the reported
product ratios. Ordinarily, the effect would be negligible for such a
small impurity, but the relative quantum yields for photodissociation
of anthracene photodimer (φ ) 0.55)12 versus 2b (φ ) 0.01) mean
that roughly 10% of the detected anthracene from samples of 2b derives
from the impurity. While the anthracene/2-methylanthracene ratio over
several GC/MS injections of a single sample is reproducible to within
1%, the run-to-run variability of the ratio in identically treated samples
is about 10%.
Scheme 1
that for the comparable monoradical (9-anthryl or phenyl in this
case). Furthermore, we find that the competing process,
assigned as ring-opening of 1 to 3,4-benzocyclodeca-3,7,9-
triene-1,5-diyne (3), is also fast, with a rate of k ≈ 4 × 105 s-1
at room temperature. A nucleophile-induced transannular
cyclization of strained enediynes is suggested as the origin for
the ionic trapping products previously attributed to dipolar
biradicals.
Flash photolysis experiments were performed at room temperature
with an Applied Photophysics (Leatherhead, Surrey, U.K.) laser kinetic
spectrometer, adapted to operate with a Spectra-Physics GCR-3G Nd3+
-
YAG laser. Transient absorption spectra with lifetimes in the range
from 10 ns to >500 µs, with OD changes of at least 5 × 10-4, can be
observed cleanly following laser photolysis at 266 nm (10 mJ/pulse).
The degassed solution, typically 80 µM concentration, was flowed
through a well-stirred quartz cuvette at a rate sufficient so that all
products from one laser shot are flushed away before the next shot.
Removal of the product arenes from each shot prior to the next was
found to be crucial in that both the anthracenes and their metastable
triplets have broad, intense UV/vis absorption spectra that mask the
spectral regions in which we needed to work. The role of diffusion
out of the observation zone for transient decays up to the millisecond
time scale could be excluded by tracking the temporal profile of the
251-nm anthracene band (ꢀ ) 220 000) following a single laser shot.
The single-shot conversion could also be determined from the absorption
at 251 nm to be 0.4% of the material in the irradiated volume. Transient
absorption spectra, taken pointwise, were signal averaged over 20 shots
at each wavelength to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. Each decay
rate is the average of approximately 15 repeated measurements.
Uncertainty bounds (1 σ) of about 10% were found for the decay rates,
measured on a given run. Repeated runs to determine run-to-run
reproducibility gave a comparable uncertainty bound.
Experimental Section
The synthetic route to 2 is modified from the procedure by
Applequist and Searle.11 Anthracene (for 2a) or 2-methylanthracene
(for 2b) and 9,10-dichloroanthracene were co-irradiated (Hanovia
450-W medium pressure Hg lamp/uranyl glass filter) in degassed
CH2Cl2 solution to afford the 4πs + 4πs adduct in moderate yield (63%
for anthracene and 50% for 2-methylanthracene after column chroma-
tography on silica gel). Reduction of the anthracene-dichloroan-
thracene adduct with triphenylmethyl sodium and subsequent recrys-
tallization of the product from superheated ether yields analytically pure
2a in 50% isolated yield as a stable, crystalline solid. 2a: mp 338-
342 °C dec; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, TMS) δ 4.96 (s, 2H),
6.89 (m, 8H), 7.02 (dd, 4H), 7.14 (dd, 4H); MS (70 eV EI), m/z 354
(100) M+; UV/vis (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 283 (3818), 274 (5127), 269 (5194),
215 (60000). The analogous reduction of the 2-methylanthracene-
dichloroanthracene adduct proceeds in much lower yield, with the
consequence that the 2b does not crystallize from the reaction mixture
without an intermediate purification by column chromatography on
silica gel. Subsequent recrystallization from xylene affords 2b in 10%
yield with >99.5% purity, as judged by NMR and GC/MS. Curiously,
the only detectable impurity is the known anthracene photodimer, which
was not present in the mixture prior to chromatography. 2b: mp 253-
255 °C dec; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, TMS) δ 2.15 (s, 3H),
4.92 (s, 1H), 4.93 (s, 1H), 6.71 (m, 1H), 6.91 (m, 6H), 6.99 (s, 1H),
7.04 (m, 5H), 7.14 (m, 2H); MS (70 eV EI), m/z 368 (100) M+; UV/
vis (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 280 (4200), 273 (5810), 215 (49600). Anal. Calcd
for C29H20: C (94.53); H (5.47). Found: C (94.30); H (5.58).
Bulk irradiation was done on degassed, 100 µM solutions of 2 at
266 nm (Spectra-Physics GCR-3G Nd3+-YAG, 6-ns pulse width, 20
Hz unfocused, 100 mW average power) in a vigorously stirred, long-
path cell set so that all of the incident UV laser light is absorbed.
Workup consisted of only filtration of the photolysate through a short
plug of silica gel to remove insoluble material resulting from the
photoreaction, followed by careful evaporation of solvent under reduced
pressure. Laser power measurements for quantum yield determination
were made with a Scientech (Arapahoe, CO) Model 390107 calibrated
laser pyrometer. The frequency-quadrupled YAG laser was used
instead of a more conventional light source because of the particular
constraints posed by 2. There exists a narrow spectral window around
270 nm in the absorption spectrum of anthracene or 2-methylanthracene
in which the arene itself would not be an internal filter. Fortunately,
2 has an absorption maximum near this window; at 266 nm, ꢀ for 2a
and anthracene are 4560 and ∼200, respectively, so electronic excitation
of anthracene or 2-methylanthracene (especially at low conversions of
2 to products) can be ignored. Fluorescence quantum yields were
measured against naphthalene as a standard in a Perkin-Elmer LS-50B
luminescence spectrometer and are uncorrected. GC/MS measurements
were performed in EI mode on a Fisons MD800 instrument equipped
with a DB-5 capillary column. Relative detection sensitivity for 2,
anthracene, and 2-methylanthracene in the GC/MS was determined
directly by injection of reference solutions containing equimolar
All solvents were spectroscopic grade and were checked by UV/vis
to ensure that there was no absorbing species at 266 nm.
Ab initio calculations were performed on an IBM RS/6000 Model
590 workstation using the Gaussian 92 and MOLCAS-3 suites of
programs.13 Given the biradical character of the species involved, we
judged it essential to use multideterminantal methods to obtain
chemically reliable results.14 Geometries were optimized at CASSCF-
(2×2), (4×4), and (6×6) levels with a relatively small basis set, 3-21G.
The energies were subsequently recomputed, at the 3-21G geometries,
with a much larger basis set, 6-31G*, and perturbative inclusion of
dynamic correlation effects. These latter CASPT2N/6-31G* calcula-
tions were done with the same (2×2), (4×4), and (6×6) active spaces.
The (2×2) active space included only the two nonbonding orbitals of
1. Adding one pair of σ and σ* orbitals involved in the through-bond
coupling15 produced the (4×4) active space. Inclusion of two σ and
σ* pairs yielded the (6×6) active space. A full description of the ab
initio calculations on 1 and its isomers will be given in a subsequent
(12) Yamamoto, S.; Grellman, K.-H.; Weller, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1980,
70, 241.
(13) Gaussian 92, Revision A; M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, M. Head-
Gordon, P. M. W. Gill, M. W. Wong, J. B. Foresman, B. G. Johnson, H.
B. Schlegel, M. A. Robb, E. S. Replogle, R. Gomperst, J. L. Andres, K.
Raghavachari, J. S. Binkley, C. Gonzales, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, D. J.
DeFrees, J. Baker, J. J. P. Stewart, J. A. Pople; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh,
PA, 1992. MOLCAS-3; K. Andersson, M. P. Fu¨lscher, G. Karlstro¨m, R.
Lindh, P. A. Malmqvist, J. Olson, B. O. Roos, A. J. Sadlej, M. R. A.
Blomberg, P. E. M. Siegbahn, V. Kello¨, J. Noga, M. Urban, P. O. Widmark,
University of Lund, Sweden, 1994.
(14) Hrovat, D. A.; Morokuma, K.; Borden, W. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 1072. Olivucci, M.; Bernardi, F.; Celani, P.; Ragazos, I.; Robb,
M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1077.
(15) A recent review of experimental and theoretical work on through-
bond coupling may be found in: Paddon-Row, M. N.; Jordan, K. D. In
Modern Models of Bonding and Delocalization; Liebman, J. F., Greenberg,
A., Eds.; VCH Publishers: New York, 1988; Chapter 3.
(10) Logan, C. F.; Chen, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2113.
(11) Applequist, D. E.; Searle, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 1389.