N. Yao et al.
Molecular Catalysis 504 (2021) 111499
Fig. 7. The XPS spectra of 5[PW]-OMS-2.
3.3. Synthesis of quinazolines
Table 1
The Mn 2p3/2 results of x[PW]-OMS-2.
By identifying the optimal reaction conditions and the catalytically
active sites, we subsequently explored the generality of this protocol for
the synthesis of 2-substituted quinazolines. As shown in Table 4, in
general, various benzyl alcohols could be efficiently converted into
benzaldehydes for further oxidative cyclization reaction, where benz-
aldehydes could bear both electron-donating groups (3b, 3 h) and
-withdrawing groups (3d-3 g) with similar effects, with exception of 3c,
3i and 3 j, efficiently coupling with 2-aminobenzylamine (2a) to give
their corresponding quinazolines in high yields (88 % - 95 %). Hetero-
cyclic benzyl alcohols, 3-pyridine methanol as well as 2-thiophene
methanol were also suitable as the coupling partners to deliver their
corresponding quinazolines (3k, 3 l), in several giving yields of 71 % and
75 %. All of the structures of quinazolines mentioned above have been
Binding energy of Mn 2p3/2 (e.V)
Manganese species (%)
Catalyst
Mn4+
Mn3+
Mn2+
Mn4+
Mn3+
Mn2+
OMS-2
643.36
643.76
643.97
643.71
644.04
643.85
643.93
643.98
642.44
642.34
642.51
642.17
642.32
642.24
642.43
642.27
641.04
640.79
642.20
640.66
641.01
640.93
642.82
641.00
60.0
38.9
28.3
34.4
31.5
34.8
34.4
26.5
35.6
57.3
57.8
63.9
51.5
45.9
63.8
43.7
4.4
0.1[PW]-OMS-2
1[PW]-OMS-2
2[PW]-OMS-2
3[PW]-OMS-2
4[PW]-OMS-2
5[PW]-OMS-2
10[PW]-OMS-2
3.7
13.9
1.7
17.0
19.3
1.8
29.8
Table 2
1
examined by HNMR as well as 13CNMR and proved to be correct. In
The O1s results of as-synthesized materials.
addition, aliphatic alcohols, such as methanol and cyclohexyl methanol
along with the other two alcohols were also tried as the reaction sub-
strates. However, only low yield target products were gained or even no
reaction occurred (3m-3p).
Binding energy of O1s (e.V)
Oxygen species (%)
Catalyst
Surface O
Lattice O
Surface O
Lattice O
OMS-2
531.12
531.43
531.07
531.43
531.49
531.01
531.44
530.97
530.03
529.85
529.71
529.94
529.77
529.75
529.93
529.79
33.6
21.9
32.1
19.6
20.7
35.9
20.2
41.9
66.4
78.1
67.9
80.4
79.3
64.1
79.8
59.1
0.1[PW]-OMS-2
1[PW]-OMS-2
2[PW]-OMS-2
3[PW]-OMS-2
4[PW]-OMS-2
5[PW]-OMS-2
10[PW]-OMS-2
3.4. The kinetic study for synthesis of 2-phenylquinazoline
To gain the reaction rate constants of the two catalysts to further
examine the excellent catalytic activity of the target catalyst in details
with the original OMS-2 as criterion, we monitored the probe reaction in
real time and linear functions were obtained separately. The experi-
mental results showed that the reaction rate of the probe reaction in the
presence of 5[PW]-OMS-2(k5[PW]-OMS-2 = 0.1635 minꢀ 1) was much
higher than that in OMS-2(kOMS-2 = 0.0482 minꢀ 1), Thus, the effec-
tiveness of the catalyst was further confirmed (Fig. 8a, b).
[PW]-OMS-2, as well as the synergistic effect of the mixed crystal phase
formed by its unique reflux preparation method that made the yield and
selectivity of the probe reaction be considerably improved. When the
doping amount reached up to 10 mol%, the poor catalytic effect, by
contrast, occurred mainly because of the small surface area of 10[PW]-
OMS-2 (Table 3, entry 13). The various oxidants were also tested in this
reaction (Table 3, entries 14, 15), the results certified that O2 had the
best oxidation performance under same reaction conditions. Although
air and H2O2 could both lead to a high conversion of 2a, selectivity of
desired product was quite poor. Moreover, the moderate yield and
selectivity gained in N2 further certified this reaction is an aerobic re-
action. More blank experiments showed that precursors for the prepa-
ration of catalysts, such as MnSO4⋅H2O and KMnO4 presented inert
effects toward the reaction (Table 3, entries 17 and 18).
As was shown in Fig. 8c, in the probe reaction system, with the in-
crease of catalyst amount (Fig. S6), the initial reaction rate accelerated
progressively, and there was a good linear relationship between catalyst
concentration and reaction rate. For the catalyst, it was a first-order
reaction. This indicated that the initial reaction rate was related to the
catalyst amount.
The kinetic study of the one-pot synthesis of 2-phenylquinazoline
was also conducted by time-dependent experiments at different tem-
peratures and the calculation of apparent activation energy (Ea) was
based on Arrhenius formula (Figs. S7 and S8). As shown in Fig. 8d, In
this linear regression equation, LnK and 1/T had an outstanding linear
relationship (R2 = 0.9911), and the final activation energy was deter-
H3PW12O40⋅xH2O used as the catalyst also failed the reaction, which
further indicated that the importance of cooperation of phosphotungstic
acid and cryptomelane in the composite (Table 3, entry19). For com-
parison, some similar work in catalytic synthesis of 2-phenylquinazoline
by other groups were also listed (Table 3, entries 20-26). In addition, we
studied several other influential factors producing on the reaction, such
as temperature (Table S3, entries 2-4), the molar ratio of substrates
(Table S3, entries 5-6), the amount of catalyst (Table S3, entries 7ꢀ 9)
and different kinds of solvents (Table S3, entries 10-15). These results
showed that all of them had great effects on the reaction. After screening
the conditions, we obtained the best reaction conditions and applied
them to the substrate expansion.
mined to be 87.73 kJ. molꢀ 1
.
The whole process monitoring experiment and hot filtration test, the
two groups of experiments, were carried out at the same time. According
to Fig. 9, almost instantaneous formation of intermediate 2-phenyl-
1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinazoline(m) (Fig. 9, line B), the yield of which
was close to 100 % within 30 min, and extremely slow formation rate of
product 3a (Fig. 9, line C), with only 26 % yield after 240 min could be
observed. This result implied that the formation rate of product 3a was
the rate-limiting step. As for hot filtration test, the reaction stopped at
the time of 30 min after the removal of 5[PW]-OMS-2 from the reaction
6