Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
Table 1: Thermodynamic data for the thermal Z!E isomerization of
oAzoBox4+ and AzoBI2+ at 293 K.
Switching
species
DG°
DH°
DS°
[kcalmolꢁ1
]
[kcalmolꢁ1
]
[calmolꢁ1 Kꢁ1
]
Z,Z!E,ZoAzoBox4+
E,Z!E,EoAzoBox4+
Z!EAzoBI2+
19.23ꢂ1.06
22.24ꢂ4.53
19.86ꢂ4.2
22.46ꢂ0.31
23.85ꢂ2.30
22.66ꢂ1.21
11.01ꢂ0.97
5.48ꢂ7.85
9.55ꢂ3.77
Figure 4. High-resolution mass spectrometry of E,E-oAzo-
Box4+ꢀ4DPDO (average values: x=0.2507, y=0.3338) (a). Global fit
by nonlinear regression of the 1H NMR shifts of the Ha, Hb, Hg and
Hh resonances to a 1:1 binding model[32] (b).
AzoBI2+ at 293 K (Figures S24, S34). DG° of E,Z-oAzo-
Box4+!E,E-oAzoBox4+ is slightly higher at 22.24 kcalmolꢁ1
(Figure S25), likely on account of the length disparity of E-
and Z-azobenzene. The magnitudes of the DG° values were
corroborated by computational studies (Tables S9, S10).
DFT calculations (B3LYP-D3(BJ)/TZVP, Figure S41)
revealed that the lowest energy molecular configuration of
Z,Z-oAzoBox4+ is 10.97 kcalmolꢁ1 greater than that of E,Z-
oAzoBox4+, which is in turn 14.43 kcalmolꢁ1 greater than that
of E,E-oAzoBox4+. Such a result, combined with the sim-
ilarity of the DG° values (Tables 1), indicates that ring
strain[31] does not play a significant role in affecting the
thermal isomerization mechanism for oAzoBox4+.
The inclusion geometry assigned to the bimolecular
complex was corroborated by quantum-mechanical calcula-
tions (Figure 2). The energy-minimized structure of E,E-
oAzoBox4+ꢀ4DPDO shows that the container adopts a cage-
like conformation with the phenyl rings of the azobenzene
moieties lying in parallel planes and the 4DPDO guest
included in the cavity of the macrocycle. Each of the oxygen
atoms of the guest are hydrogen-bonded to two of the four of
acidic Hd protons in an approximately symmetric fashion
(Figure S42). This interpretation of the binding is supported
by the significant downfield shift of the Hd proton resonance
and a series of 1H NMR titration experiments (see the
Supporting Information). Calculations also reveal that the
macrocycle adopts a significantly expanded conformation in
comparison to that of the solid-state structure upon guest
sequestration with an appreciably reduced aspect ratio of
about 3. Similar conclusions were also established by quan-
tum-mechanical calculations for E,E-oAzoBox4+ꢀBPDC
(Figure S46).
The large size of E,E-oAzoBox4+ led us to consider
whether small organic guest compounds could be accommo-
dated within the cavity of the macrocycle. The representative
compounds, 2,2’-dipyridyl N,N’-dioxide (2DPDO), 4,4’-dipyr-
idyl N,N’-dioxide (4DPDO), 4-phenylpyridine N-oxide
(PPO), and biphenyl-4,4’-dicarboxylate (BPDC) were
chosen to test the interaction of E,E-oAzoBox4+ with hydro-
1
gen bond acceptor aromatic structures (Figure 1c). H NMR
revealed a binding interaction between E,E-oAzoBox4+ with
4DPDO, PPO and BPDC (Figures 3b, S36, and S37).
However, no interaction was detected between E,E-oAzo-
Box4+ with 2DPDO, presumably on account of steric effects.
All cases of binding exhibited upfield shift perturbations of
the aromatic resonances, Ha and Hb, whereas proton
resonances Hg-i shifted downfield. The encapsulated guest
proton resonances shifted upfield on account of the shielding
by the azobenzene moieties at the long sides of E,E-oAzo-
Box4+.
Exposure of E,E-oAzoBox4+ꢀ4DPDO to UV light indu-
ces the E!Z isomerization of the host and the release of
4DPDO, evidenced by the downfield shift of the Hw and Hf
resonances (Figures 5 and S51). This result can be rational-
ized by assuming the 4DPDO affinity of E,Z-oAzoBox4+ and
Z,Z-oAzoBox4+ is negligible in comparison to that of E,E-
oAzoBox4+. Indeed, when excess 4DPDO was added into
a Z-predominant oAzoBox4+ isomeric mixture, no evidence
of interaction was detected between Z,Z-oAzoBox4+ and the
guest molecule (unperturbed Z,Z-Ha resonances) and only
extremely limited interaction was observed for E,Z- oAzo-
Box4+ (Figures 3d,e). An attempt to quantify the 4DPDO
affinity of the E,Z stereoisomers was unsuccessful on account
of the limited interaction between the guest and the host after
UV light irradiation. In any event, irradiating the mixture
with visible light reverts the system back to the E,E-
oAzoBox4+ꢀ4DPDO enriched state.
4DPDO was selected as a representative example to
illustrate the encapsulation potential of E,E-oAzoBox4+ in
acetonitrile. A 1H NMR titration of 4DPDO into E,E-oAzo-
Box4+ provided an association constant on the order of 103 mꢁ1
(Figure 4) corresponding to an association free energy of
about ꢁ4 kcalmolꢁ1, which is consistent with the computa-
tionally obtained value of ꢁ4.06 kcalmolꢁ1 (see the Support-
ing
Information).
The
formation
of
E,E-oAzo-
Box4+ꢀ4DPDO was also confirmed by mass spectrometry
1
(Figures 4a, S38). A control H NMR experiment, whereby
The thermal stability of Z-predominant oAzoBox4+ was
unaffected by the presence of 4DPDO (Figure S35). The low
4DPDO affinity of E,Z-oAzoBox4+ and Z,Z-oAzoBox4+ can
be attributed to a significant decrease in the size of the cavity
of the macrocycle. Additionally, favorable orientation of the
acidic Hd protons towards the interior of the cavity is lost
upon UV light irradiation, and consequently the possibility of
establishing concerted hydrogen-bonding interactions
between the host and guest. This was supported by calculated
4DPDO was mixed with an equimolar amount of E-AzoBI2+,
showed no evidence of interaction, suggesting that macro-
cyclic preorganization is a requirement for strong binding in
our system (Figure S13). Similar conclusions were obtained
from an analogous experiment with 4DPDO and a,a’-bis[3-
(1-methylimidazolium)]-o-xylene, a model subcomponent
analog of the o-xylene bridging unit of oAzoBox4+ (Fig-
ure S14).
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1 – 6
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!