192105-2
Lue et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 192105 ͑2009͒
1000
30
25
20
15
10
5
x=0
Sr1-xYxSi2
(a)
x=0.03
x=0.05
x=0.08
x=0.10
x=0.15
100
10
1
x=0
x=0.03
x=0.05
x=0.08
x=0.10
x=0.15
200
150
100
50
(b)
x=0
x=0.03
x=0.05
x=0.08
x=0.10
x=0.15
0
0
10
100
T
(K)
-50
-100
-150
FIG. 3. ͑Color online͒ Temperature dependence of the total thermal conduc-
tivity in Sr1−xYxSi2.
0
50 100 150 200 250 300
increase and consequently decreases after passing through a
highest one for x=0.08. The change in S with higher Y
amounts indicates the modification of the electronic band
structure. In these alloys, the Seebeck coefficient develops a
broad maximum, a common feature due to the contribution
of the thermally excited electrons across their pseudogaps.
For x=0.03, 0.05, and 0.10, the sign of the low-
temperature S data is negative accompanied by negative
peaks at around 50 K. Such a feature can be qualitatively
interpreted in terms of two-carrier conduction mechanism.
Accordingly, the total S can be expressed as
T
(K)
FIG. 2. ͑Color online͒ ͑a͒ Electrical resistivity as a function of temperature
for Sr1−xYxSi2. ͑b͒ Seebeck coefficient vs temperature in Sr1−xYxSi2.
Greaves15 VRH conduction, where the dc resistivity
dc
1/4
ͱ
obeys the relationship dcϰ T exp͓͑To/T͒ ͔, with the char-
acteristic constant To inversely propositional to the Fermi-
level DOS. The satisfactory fitting suggests that the presence
of microstructural inhomogeneity or antisite disorder in
Sr1−xYxSi2 could be the main source for the observed nega-
tive TCR. Moreover, the deduced value of To initially de-
creases with increasing the Y concentration and then in-
creases with further adding of more Y content. Such a trend
is consistent with the variation in the electrical resistivity,
indicative of the reliable interpretation for the electrical
transport of Sr1−xYxSi2. With these respects, it is not appro-
priate to classify these Y-doped samples as semiconductors
with real band gaps in their Fermi-level DOS. Rather, they
should be realized as semimetals with pseudogaps in the vi-
cinity of the Fermi levels. Note that the evolution of the
electrical resistivity caused by the chemical substitution is
not quite consistent with the case of the pressure effect. It is
likely that the Fermi-level band structure of SrSi2 has been
severely changed with varying the Y content, especially for
the higher Y concentration. As a matter of fact, employing Y
as an electron donor in SrSi2 would modify its electronic
band feature.
p
n
S =
Sn +
Sp,
͑1͒
n +
n +
p
p
where Sn,p and represent the Seebeck coefficients and
n,p
electrical conductivities for the n- and p-type carriers, re-
spectively. Since the signs of Sn and Sp are opposite, tuning
these quantities could result in a sign change in S. For these
Y-doped samples, the low-temperature Seebeck coefficients
are mainly dominated by the n-type carriers. However, with
increasing temperature, the intrinsic electrons and holes are
excited across the pseudogaps. If the holes have a slightly
higher mobility than the electrons, the thermal transport is
increasingly governed by the p-type carriers, as we observed
in these materials.
In Fig. 3, we display the observed thermal conductivity
for all studied samples. At low temperatures, increases
with temperature and a maximum appears between 20 and
40 K. This is a typical feature for the reduction in thermal
scattering in solids at low temperatures. A remarkable trend
found in is that the height of the low-temperature peak
decreases drastically with increasing the substitution level,
indicative of a strong enhancement in the phonon scattering
by lattice imperfections. On the other hand, the thermal con-
ductivity exhibits a marginal reduction with the substitution
level for TՆ200 K, showing a room-temperature of about
5 W/mK. This is attributed to the dominant lattice thermal
Figure 2͑b͒ shows the Seebeck coefficient as a function
of temperature for the Sr1−xYxSi2 alloys. The positive sign of
S for the stoichiometric compound of SrSi2 implies that the
hole-type carriers dominate the heat transport. The room-
temperature S value of about 135 V/K is consistent with
the previously reported result.10 For the slightly substituted
sample ͑x=0.03͒, the magnitude of S tends to reduce, pre-
sumably attributed to the band filling effect, as Y has one
more electron in its valence shell than Sr. Upon further sub-
stituting Y for Sr ͑xՆ0.05͒, the magnitude of S becomes to
L
et al.10 for SrSi . The absence of an effective decrease in
84.88.136.149 On: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:30:05