Full Papers
doi.org/10.1002/ejic.202001096
Crystals were collected with a yield of 57 mg (22% based on
Na [A-α-SiW O ]·16H O). FT-IR: �n =999 (s), 946(s), 885 (s), 856 (s),
Synthesis of K Na [(Yb SiW O ) (W O )(OH) (H O) ]·56H O
11 15 2 10 38 4 3 8 4 2 2 2
(9a)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
0
9
34
2
À 1
745 cm . Elemental analysis (%) calcd (found): Na 1.66 (1.80), K
The above synthetic protocol procedure was followed by using
Yb(NO ) ·5H O (0.0898 g, 0.2 mmol) instead of Sm(NO ) ·6H O.
4.50 (4.90), W 56.91 (58.03), Si 0.81 (0.92). The number of water
molecules was calculated by TGA.
3
3
2
3 3
2
Crystals were collected with a yield of 59 mg (23% based on
Na [A-α-SiW O ]·16H O). FT-IR: �n =1008 (s), 946 (s), 896 (s), 853 (s),
1
0
9
34
2
À 1
7
65 (w) cm . Elemental analysis (%) calcd (found): Na 2.49 (2.60), K
Synthesis of K Na [(Tb SiW O ) (W O )(OH) (H O) ]·60H O
1
5
11
2
10 38 4
3
8
4
2
2
2
3.11 (4.01), W 57.08 (58.12), Si 0.81 (0.83). The number of water
molecules was calculated by TGA.
(4a)
The above synthetic protocol procedure was followed by using
Tb(NO ) ·5H O (0.087 g, 0.2 mmol) instead of Sm(NO ) ·6H O.
3
3
2
3 3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Crystals were collected with a yield of 72 mg (28% based on
Synthesis of K Na [(Y SiW O ) (W O )(OH) (H O) ]·55H O
1
1
15
2
10 38 4
3
8
4
2
2
2
Na [A-α-SiW O ]·16H O). FT-IR: �n =1002 (s), 941(s), 896 (s), 855 (s),
(10a)
1
0
9
34
2
À 1
760 cm . Elemental analysis (%) calcd (found): Na 1.82 (1.92), K
.22 (4.75), W 56.85 (57.20), Si 0.81 (0.87). The number of water
The above synthetic protocol procedure was followed by using
Y(NO ) ·6H O (0.0766 g, 0.2 mmol) instead of Sm(NO ) ·6H O.
4
molecules was calculated by TGA.
3 3
2
3 3
2
Crystals were collected with a yield of 67 mg (26% based on
Na [A-α-SiW O ]·16H O). FT-IR: n=1003 (s), 940 (s), 895 (s), 855 (s),
�
1
0
9
À 1
34
2
760 (w) cm . Elemental analysis (%) calcd (found). Na 1.61 (1.67), K
.36 (3.69), W 59.89 (60.95), Si 0.85 (0.90). The number of water
Synthesis of K Na [(Dy SiW O ) (W O )(OH) (H O) ]·68H O
1
9
7
2
10 38 4
3
8
4
2
2
2
3
(5a)
molecules was calculated by TGA.
The above synthetic protocol procedure was followed by using
Dy(NO ) ·H O (0.0877 g, 0.2 mmol) instead of Sm(NO ) ·6H O.
3
3
2
3 3
2
Crystals were collected with a yield of 77 mg (30% based on
X-ray crystallography
Na10[A-α-SiW
7
O
34]·16H
O). FT-IR: �n =1000 (s), 940 (s), 890 (s), 857 (s),
61 (m), 715 (w) cm . Elemental analysis (%) calcd (found): Na 1.14
9
2
À 1
Single crystals of 1a–10a suitable for X-ray diffraction were
mounted on a capillary tube for indexing and intensity data
collection at 192 K. An Xcalibur Oxford diffractometer was used
(
1.81), K 5.25 (5.60), W 55.90 (57.10), Si 0.79 (0.87). The number of
water molecules was calculated by TGA.
which operated at 50 kV and 40 mA (Mo K , λ=0.71073 Å, graphite
α
[42]
monochromated).
Pre-experiment, data collection and data
reduction [ were performed with the Oxford program suite
Synthesis of K Na [(Ho SiW O ) (W O )(OH) (H O) ]·57H O
2
0
6
2
10 38 4
3
8
4
2
2
2
43]
CrysAlisPro. An empirical adsorption correction based on symme-
(6a)
[
44]
try equivalent reflections was applied using SCALE3 ABSPACK.
The above synthetic protocol procedure was followed by using
Ho(NO ) ·5H O (0.0882 g, 0.2 mmol) instead of Sm(NO ) ·6H O.
The crystal structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXS-
[45]
3
3
2
3 3
2
2008, which located all the heavy metal atoms (W and Ln) and
Crystals were collected with a yield of 57 mg (22% based on
enabled us to locate all the positions of other non-hydrogen atoms
(O, K, Na, Si) from the difference Fourier maps. The last cycles of
refinement included atomic positions, anisotropic thermal parame-
ters for all the heavy metal atoms and isotropic thermal parameters
for all other non-hydrogen (O) atoms. Some of the tungsten atoms
were refined with partial occupancies and isotropic due to disorder.
Due to disorder, the R-factor for some of the crystals are higher
than usual but, the structure has been solved with utmost precision
as possible. Some of the oxygen atoms are disordered water
molecules and as a result the structure has solvent accessible voids.
The data obtained are Full-matrix least squares structure refinement
Na [A-α-SiW O ]·16H O). FT-IR: �n =1005 (s), 950 (s), 880 (s), 857 (s),
10
9
34
2
À 1
7
5
55 (m) cm . Elemental analysis (%) calcd (found): Na 0.99 (1.11), K
.59 (6.02), W 56.55 (57.02) Si 0.80 (0.87). The number of water
molecules was calculated by TGA.
Synthesis of K Na [(Er SiW O ) (W O )(OH) (H O) ]·60H O
16
10
2
10 38 4
3
8
4
2
2
2
(7a)
The above synthetic protocol procedure was followed by using
Er(NO ·5H O (0.0886 g, 0.2 mmol) instead of Sm(NO ·6H O.
)
3
)
3
3
2
3
2
2
against jF j was performed using the SHELXL-2015 package of
Crystals were collected with a yield of 62 mg (24% based on
[45]
programs. The crystal data is shown in Table 4.
Na [A-α-SiW O ]·16H O). FT-IR: �n =1002 (s), 943 (s), 888 (s), 859 (s),
1
0
9
34
2
À 1
7
50 (w) cm . Elemental analysis (%) calcd (found): Na 1.64 (1.89), K
.47 (5.02), W 56.51 (58.10), Si 0.80 (0.86). The number of water
the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data
are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic
4
molecules was calculated by TGA.
Synthesis of K Na [(Tm SiW O ) (W O )(OH) (H O) ]·57H O
1
1
15
2
10 38 4
3
8
4
2
2
2
(8a)
The above synthetic protocol procedure was followed by using
Tm(NO ) ·5H O (0.089 g, 0.2 mmol) instead of Sm(NO ) ·6H O.
3 3
2
3 3
2
FTIR Spectroscopy
Crystals were collected with a yield of 54 mg (21% based on
Na [A-α-SiW O ]·16H O). FT-IR: �n =1006 (s), 943(s), 892 (s), 857 (s),
FT-IR spectra of all the complexes 1a–10a were recorded on a
PerkinElmer BX spectrometer using KBr pellets. All complexes show
similar spectral patterns. The finger-print region of POM ligands is
1
0
9
34
2
À 1
7
60 (w) cm . Elemental analysis (%) calcd (found): Na 2.49 (2.86), K
.10 (3.48), W 56.97 (57.15), Si 0.81 (0.89). The number of water
3
À 1
molecules was calculated by TGA.
in the range from 1000–400 cm and in this region four major
characteristic vibration bands (asymmetric) are obtained, which are
attributed to ν (SiÀ O ), terminal ν (WÀ O ), corner sharing ν
as
a
as
t
as-
(
WÀ O À W), and edge-sharing ν (WÀ O À W). The asymmetric vibra-
b
as
c
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 1071–1081
1078
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH