and the mild conditions for its cleavage.6 Consequently, we
decided to apply this chiral reagent to the asymmetric
syntheses of the 1-aryl-2,2,2-trifluoroethylamines 6 using
2-methyl-N-(2,2,2-trifluoroethylidene)propane-2-sulfin-
amide 3 as a key precursor. The advantage of this approach
is that a variety of chiral 1-aryl-2,2,2-trifluoroethylamine
analogues can be rapidly produced by simply changing the
organometallic reagents in the 1,2-addition step.
Table 1. Diastereoselective 1,2-Addition of Phenylmagnesium
Bromide to Imine 3
The representative preparation conditions for key inter-
mediate 3 are shown in Scheme 1. Variation of the source
entry
solvent
Lewis acids
yield of 5ad (%)
dre
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
PhMe
none
none
none
AlMe3
AlMe3
AlEt3
BF3‚Et2Oc
TiCl4
Zn(OTf)2
52
31
54
55
51
46
36
11
7
72:28
74:26
85:15
88:12
90:10
88:12
88:12
93:07
89:11
89:11
THFa
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
Scheme 1. Preparation of Imine 3
b
c
c
c
b
b
Mg(OTf)2
34
a CH2Cl2 was removed by distillation and replaced by THF. b Precom-
plexation of imine 3 with Lewis acid at 0 °C, cooled to -78 °C, addition
of phenylmagnesium bromide solution. c Precomplexation of imine 3 with
Lewis acid at 0 °C; added to phenylmagnesium bromide solution at -78
°C. d Isolated yield. e Diastereomeric ratio (dr) was determined by chiral
HPLC of the unpurified amine salt 6a.
of trifluoroacetaldehyde, solvent, temperature, and condensa-
tion mediator identified 1.1 equiv of trifluoroacetaldehyde
hydrate 2a in dichloromethane or toluene at 40 °C in the
presence of 4 Å molecular sieves as the optimal conditions
for the preparation of 37 from 1. Imine 3 was converted to
an aminal upon aqueous quenching, and a poor yield (22%)
was obtained by distillation due to decompositon.
from the 1,2-addition, is also S (entry 1). This provided us
with a reliable method for determining the diastereomeric
ratio of different analogues of 5 in this report. After
establishment of the absolute stereochemistry of each dia-
stereomer in the mixture of sulfinamides, we then investi-
gated the solvent effect on the 1,2-addition reaction. When
the reaction was performed in THF, a similar diastereomeric
ratio of 5a was observed (entry 2). However, when dichloro-
methane was used as solvent, a modest improvement in
diastereoselectivity was observed (entry 3).
Since Lewis acids usually improve both the yield and
diastereoselectivity of the 1,2-additon reaction,6e,10 we screened
a variety of Lewis acids in the phenylmagnesium bromide
addition to imine 3 using dichloromethane as solvent. Table
1 highlights some Lewis acids which afforded a slight
improvement in the diastereoselectivity of 5a. The best
diastereoselectivity was achieved with TiCl4 as additive.
Unfortunately, these conditions afforded 5a in a very low
yield (entry 9). The order of addition had no effect on the
yield and diastereoselectivity of the reaction (entries 4 and
5).
In order to avoid isolation and purification of 3, we decided
to investigate a one-pot, two-step process for the preparation
of sulfinamide 5. Our initial efforts were focused on the effect
of solvent on the addition of phenylmagnesium bromide 4
to substrate 3 and the establishment of the absolute stereo-
chemistry of the major isomer of 5a (Table 1). Reaction of
1 equiv of phenylmagnesium bromide 4 with the crude imine
3 in toluene at -78 °C for 1 h gave a 52% yield of 5a from
1. The chiral reagent of 5a was cleaved with HCl in
methanol6a,b,8 to afford the corresponding amine salt 6a,
which was subjected to chiral HPLC analysis. The enantio-
meric ratio of 6a was found to be 72:28. On the basis of the
comparison to an authentic standard,3,5 the absolute config-
uration of the major enantiomer 6a was assigned as S. As it
has previously been established that the sulfinamide auxiliary
cleavage usually occurs without any erosion of chirality,3,9
this indicated that the absolute configuration of the major
diastereomer 5a at the newly formed stereocenter, generated
(6) (a) Ellman, J. A.; Liu, G.; Cogan, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 9913-9914. (b) Ellman, J. A.; Liu, G.; Cogan, D. A. Tetrahedron
1999, 55, 8883-8904. (c) Ellman, J. A.; Timothy, D. O.; Tang, T. P. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 984-995. (d) Senanayake, C. H.; Krishnamurthy,
D.; Lu, Z.-H.; Han, Z.; Gallou, I. Aldrichim. Acta 2005, 38, 93-104. (e)
Jiang, W.; Chen, C.; Marinkovic, D.; Tran, J. A.; Chen, C. W.; Arellano,
L. M.; White, N. S.; Tucci, F. C. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8924-8931.
(7) Only one isomer was observed by 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR spectrom-
etry. The stereochemistry of 3 was assigned as E based on NOE between
the proton of imine and the proton of tert-butyl and by analogy (see Davis,
F. A.; Reddy, R. E.; Szewczyk, G.; Reddy, V.; Portonovo, P. S.; Zhang,
H.; Fanelli, D.; Reddy, R. T.; Zhou, P.; Carroll, P. J. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 2555-2563 and ref 5e).
As we were not successful in improving the diastereo-
selectivity of the phenylmagnesium bromide 4 addition to
imine 3 using Lewis acids as promoter, we explored the 1,2-
addition reaction using lithium reagents (Table 2).11 After
optimization of the solvent, temperature, order of addition,
and number of equivalents, it was found that the addition of
3 in toluene to 2.5 equiv of phenyllithium (freshly generated
from phenyl bromide and 2.5 M n-BuLi in THF) at -78 °C
(8) Ellman, J. A.; Cogan, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 268-
269.
(10) (a) Ellman, J. A.; Cogan, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 268-
269. (b) Senanayake, C.; Lu, B. Z.; Li, N.; Han, Z.; Bakale, R. P.; Wald,
S. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2599-2602. (c) Larhed, M.; Arefalk, A.;
Wannberg, J.; Hallberg, A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1265-1268.
(9) Senanayake, C. H.; Pflum, D. A.; Krishnamurthy, D.; Han, Z.; Wald,
S. A. Tetrahedron. Lett. 2002, 43, 923-926.
684
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 4, 2007