8
08
R. Kuriata et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 21 (2010) 805–809
in anhydrous diethyl ether (80 ml). The mixture was stirred at
10 °C until TLC monitoring showed the absence of substrate 3
about 1 h). Then, distilled water was dropped carefully until white
precipitate was observed. Next, the solution was decanted and
dried over anhydrous MgSO . After removing the solvent, the crude
3.3. Enzymatic hydrolysis of (+)-1-[(1S,5R)-6,6-dimethylbicyclo-
[3.1.0]hex-2-en-2-yl)]ethyl acetate (RS,1S,5R)-5
ꢁ
(
Enzymatic hydrolysis of (+)-1-[(1S,5R)-6,6-dimethylbicyclo-
[3.1.0]hex-2-en-2-yl)]ethyl acetate 5 was carried out in a biphasic
system (3.8 ml) consisting of 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7
(3.0 ml), and a mixture of diisopropyl ether (0.2 ml) with n-hexane
(0.6 ml). After the addition of the substrate (0.60 g, 3.1 mmol) and
100 mg of suitable lipase the reactions were carried out at room
temperature with shaking (150 rpm). The reactions were stopped
after certain periods of time, and the product was extracted twice
with 15 ml of ethyl acetate and the organic phase was dried over
4
product 4 was purified by column chromatography (eluent: hex-
ane–ethyl acetate 7:1) to give mixture of alcohol (RS,1S,5R)-4
(
3.0 g, 19.7 mmol, 74% yield). Chiral gas chromatography showed
two diastereoisomers of alcohol (RS,1S,5R)-4 in a ratio of 85 to
2
D
8
28
ꢁ1
1
3
1
5. ½a
ꢀ
¼ þ87:0 (c 1.0, CHCl
3
); nD ¼ 1:4783; IR (film, cm ):
354 (vs); 3019 (s); 2867 (s); 1638 (w); 1449 (s); 1373 (vs);
065 (vs); 802 (vs); H NMR (CDCl , 300 MHz): 0.68 (s, 3H at C-7
1
3
or at C-8, S-isomer); 0.70 (s, 3H at C-7 or at C-8, R-isomer); 0.93
s, 3H at C-7 or at C-8, S-isomer); 0.95 (s, 3H at C-7 or at C-8, R-iso-
mer); 1.16 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H at C-10); 1.23 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H at C-5);
4
anhydrous MgSO . After filtration, the solvent was removed by
evaporation and the obtained products were purified by column
chromatography and analyzed by GC and CGC.
(
1
3
.53 (dd, J = 6.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H at C-1, R-isomer); 1.63 (dd, J = 6.6,
.0 Hz, 1H at C-1, S-isomer); 1.97 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H at C-4); 2.32
3.4. Enzymatic transesterification of (+)-1-[(1S,5R)-6,6-di-methyl
bicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-en-2-yl)]ethanol (RS,1S,5R)-4; (+)-(1S)-1-[(1S,
5R)-6,6-dimethylbicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-en-2-yl)]ethanol (S,1S,5R)-4;
(+)-(1R)-1-[(1S,5R)-6,6-dimethylbicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-en-2-yl)]
ethyl acetate (R,1S,5R)-5
(
4
dd, J = 18.1, 8.2 Hz, 1H at C-4, R-isomer); 2.51–2.52 (m, 1H at C-
, S-isomer); 4.11 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H at C-9, S-isomer); 4.26 (q,
13
J = 6.3 Hz, 1H at C-9, R-isomer); 5.24 (s, 1H at C-3); C NMR (CDCl
5 MHz): 13.10 (C-7 or C-8, S-isomer); 13.18 (C-7 or C-8, R-iso-
mer); 19.40 (C-6); 21.54 (C-10, S-isomer); 21.96 (C-10, R-isomer);
3
,
7
2
3
6.33 (C-7 or C-8); 29.22 (C-5, R-isomer); 29.82 (C-5, S-isomer);
1.06 (C-4, S-isomer); 31.71 (C-4, R-isomer); 36.73 (C-1); 66.85
Enzymatic transesterification of (+)-1-[(1S,5R)-6,6-dimethyl-
bicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-en-2-yl)]ethanol (RS,1S,5R)-4 was carried out
in diisopropyl ether (6 ml) with the addition of 40 mg of powdered
molecular sieves (3 Å mesh). 2.00 g (13.1 mmol) of the substrate;
1600 mg of suitable lipase and vinyl acetate (3.60 ml, 39.1 mmol)
were added. The reactions were carried out at 37 °C in a shaker
(150 rpm). The reaction was stopped after certain periods of time
by filtration followed by evaporation of the organic layer. The
resulting product was purified by column chromatography (eluent:
hexane–acetone from 40:1 to 10:1) to give alcohol 4 and acetate 5.
(
C-9, S-isomer); 67.30 (C-9, R-isomer); 124.42 (C-3, R-isomer);
1
7
26.62 (C-3, S-isomer); 148.32 (C-2). Anal. Calcd for C10H16O: C,
8.90; H, 10.59. Found: C, 78.69; H, 10.67.
3
.2. (+)-1-[(1S,5R)-6,6-Dimethylbicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-en-2-yl)]-
ethyl acetate (RS,1S,5R)-5
The mixture of alcohol (RS,1S,5R)-4 (0.80 g, 5.2 mmol) in
2
9
anhydrous diethyl ether (60 ml) and anhydrous pyridine
Alcohol (S,1S,5R)-4: ee = 78%; ½
a
ꢀ
¼ þ12:0 (c 1.0, CHCl
3
);
D
3
0
ꢁ1
(
0.64 ml, 7.9 mmol) was intensively stirred at an ice bath tem-
perature. Next, the solution of fresh distilled acetyl chloride
0.56 ml, 7.9 mmol) in anhydrous diethyl ether (60 ml) was
n
¼ 1:4717; IR (film, cm ): 3354 (vs); 3019 (s); 2867 (s); 1638
D
1
3
(w); 1449 (s); 1373 (vs); 1065 (vs); 802 (vs); H NMR (CDCl ,
(
300 MHz): 0.68 (s, 3H at C-7 or at C-8); 0.93 (s, 3H at C-7 or at
C-8); 1.16 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H at C-10); 1.23 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H at C-
5); 1.63 (dd, J = 6.6, 3.0 Hz, 1H at C-1); 1.97 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H at
C-4); 2.51–2.52 (m, 1H at C-4); 4.11 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H at C-9);
added carefully. The reaction was carried out at room tempera-
ture and stopped when TLC analysis showed the absence of sub-
strate 4, and then the reaction mixture was diluted with diethyl
ether (120 ml). To the obtained slightly acidic environment a
solution of dilute HCl was added. The aqueous phase was ex-
tracted three times with diethyl ether. All ether phases were
1
3
3
5.24 (s, 1H at C-3); C NMR (CDCl , 75 MHz): 13.10 (C-7 or C-8);
19.40 (C-6); 21.54 (C-10); 26.33 (C-7 or C-8); 29.82 (C-5); 31.06
(C-4); 36.73 (C-1); 66.85 (C-9); 126.62 (C-3); 148.32 (C-2). Anal.
washed with 2% H
rated NaCl solution. The organic phase was dried over MgSO
and after removing the solvent, the crude product (RS,1S,5R)-5
was obtained (0.88 g, 4.5 mmol, 86% yield). Chiral gas chroma-
tography showed two diasteroisomers of acetate (RS,1S,5R)-5 in
2
SO
4
solution, 10% NaHCO
3
solution, and satu-
Calcd for C10
H16O: C, 78.90; H, 10.59. Found: C, 78.64; H, 10.74.
2
6
28
4
Acetate (R,1S,5R)-5: ½
aꢀ
D
3
¼ þ180:0 (c 1.0, CHCl ); nD ¼ 1:4597;
ꢁ1
IR (film, cm ): 3021 (w); 2940 (m); 1737 (s); 1641 (w); 1448 (m);
1
3
1371 (m); 1242 (vs); 1048 (m); H NMR (CDCl , 600 MHz): 0.77 (s,
3H at C-7 or at C-8); 1.05 (s, 3H at C-7 or at C-8); 1.32 (d, J = 6.4 Hz,
3H at C-10); 1.33 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H at C-5); 1.66 (dd, J = 7.1, 3.2 Hz,
1H at C-1); 2.05 (s, 3H at C-12); 2.07 (d, J = 18.1 Hz, 1H at C-4); 2.43
(dd, J = 18.1, 7.7 Hz, 1H at C-4); 5.38 (s, 1H at C-3); 5.43 (q,
2
D
8
26
a ratio of 85 to 15. ½
a
ꢀ
¼ þ225:0 (c 1.0, CHCl
3
), nD ¼ 1:4578;
ꢁ1
IR (film, cm ): 2868 (s); 1736 (vs); 1448 (m); 1371 (m); 1242
(
3
vs); 1062 (m); 800 (w); 1H NMR (CDCl
H at C-7 or at C-8, R-isomer); 0.71 (s, 3H at C-7 or at C-8, S-iso-
3
, 300 MHz): 0.69 (s,
1
3
3
J = 6,5 Hz, 1H at C-9); C NMR (CDCl , 75 MHz): 14.95 (C-7 or C-
mer); 0.96 (s, 3H at C-7 or at C-8, S-isomer); 0.98 (s, 3H at C-7 or
at C-8, R-isomer); 1.24 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H at C-10); 1.25 (t,
J = 7.9 Hz, 1H at C-5); 1.58 (dd, J = 6.5, 3.1 Hz, 1H at C-1, R-iso-
mer); 1.61 (dd, J = 7.0, 3.4 Hz, 1H at C-1, S-isomer); 1.97 (s, 3H
at C-12); 2.02 (d, J = 16.1 Hz, 1H at C-4); 2.36 (dd, J = 18.3,
8); 18.70 (C-10); 19.13 (C-6); 21.41 (C-7 or C-8); 27.94 (C-5);
28.88 (C-4); 29.98 (C-1); 46.73 (C-12); 75.15 (C-9); 108.31 (C-3);
18 2
148.53 (C-2); 170.86 (C-11). Anal. Calcd for C12H O : C, 74.19;
H, 9.34. Found: C, 74.11; H, 9.46.
7
5
(
.8 Hz, 1H at C-4, R-isomer); 2.51–2.53 (m, 1H at C-4, S-isomer);
3.5. (+)-(1R)-1-[(1S,5R)-6,6-Dimethylbicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-en-2-
yl)]ethanol (R,1S,5R)-4
.22 (q, J = 6,4 Hz, 1H at C-9, S-isomer); 5.30 (s, 1H at C-3); 5.36
q, J = 6,1 Hz, 1H at C-9, R-isomer);1 C NMR (CDCl
3
3
, 75 MHz):
1
3.07 (C-7 or C-8); 19.43 (C-6); 21.30 (C-10, R-isomer); 21.70
Acetate (obtained by enzymatic transesterification in anhy-
(
C-10, S-isomer); 26.32 (C-7 or C-8); 29.11 (C-5); 30.40 (C-4, S-
isomer); 31.78 (C-4, R-isomer); 35.93 (C-1, S-isomer); 36.69 (C-
, R-isomer); 43.73 (C-12); 66.83 (C-9, S-isomer); 69.33 (C-9, R-
isomer); 124.40 (C-3, S-isomer); 125.34 (C-3, R-isomer); 143.61
C-2); 170.35 (C-11). Anal. Calcd for C12 : C, 74.19; H,
.34. Found: C, 74.11; H, 9.46.
drous conditions) (R,1S,5R)-5 (1.20 g, 6.17 mmol) in anhydrous
diethyl ether (60 ml) was dropped to a solution of LiAlH
4
1
(0.480 g, 12.6 mmol) in anhydrous diethyl ether (80 ml). The mix-
ture was stirred at room temperature until TLC monitoring showed
the absence of substrate 5 (about 1 h). Then, distilled water was
dropped carefully until a white precipitate was observed. Next,
(
9
18 2
H O