4050 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 104, No. 17, 2000
Fang
1
tion of the experimental fact that NH (a ∆) is formed with a
(5) Casassa, M. P.; Foy, B. R.; Stephenson, J. C.; King, D. S. J. Chem.
Phys. 1991, 94, 250.
3
-
quantum yield of 0.4, while the NH (X ∑ ) yield is less than
(
6) Chen, J.; Quinones, E.; Dagdigian, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90,
603.
(7) Sauder, D. G.; Patel-Misra, D.; Dagdigian, P. J. J. Chem. Phys.
989, 91, 5316.
0
.002 in the UV photolysis10 of HN3 at 193 nm.
7
1
1
2
2
As shown in Figure 2, when N3(X Πg) and H ( S) approach
each other, there exist three spin-conserved pathways leading
to HN3 (S0), HN3 (S1), and N2 (X ∑g ) + NH (X ∑ ). The
first two have been discussed before. The last one is reaction
(8) Gericke, K.-H.; Theinl, R.; Comes, F. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989,
1
+
3
-
64, 605. Gericke, K.-H.; Theinl, R.; Comes, F. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1990,
92, 6548.
(9) Chu, J. J.; Marcus, P.; Dagdigian, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 93,
57.
4
. A transition state [TS (T1)] shown in Figure 1 is found on
2
this triplet pathway. The optimized TS (T1) is similar in structure
to that of reaction 6. The barrier height of reaction 4 is 20.8
kcal/mol, which is 7.1 kcal/mol lower in energy than that of
the reverse process of reaction 6.
(10) Rohrer, F.; Stuhl, F. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 4788.
(11) Gericke, K.-H.; Haas, T.; Lock, M.; Theinl, R.; Comes, F. J. J.
Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 6104.
12) Hawley, M.; Baronavski, F.; Nelson, H. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1993,
9, 2638.
(
9
(
13) Gericke, K.-H.; Haas, T.; Lock, M.; Comes, F. J. Chem. Phys. Lett.
Summary
1
991, 186, 427. Haas, T.; Gericke, K.-H.; Maul, C.; Comes, F. J. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 1993, 202, 108.
14) Lock, M.; Gericke, K.-H.; Comes, F. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 213,
385.
In the present work, photodissociation of HN3 at long
wavelength (355-248 nm) is investigated with the complete
active space SCF molecular orbital method. The mechanism
leading to different products is determined on the basis of the
optimized ground- and excited-state potential energy surfaces
of dissociation and their crossing points. After the HN3
molecules are excited to the S1 state, the most probable pathway
(
(
15) Barnes, R. J.; Gross, A.; Lock, M.; Sinha, A. J. Phys. Chem. A
1
997, 101, 6133-6137.
(16) Schoennenbeck, G.; Biehl, H.; Stuhl, F.; Meier, U.; Staemmler, V.
J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 2210.
(17) Cook, P. A.; Langford, S. R.; Ashfold, M. N. R. Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys. 1999, 1, 45.
(
18) Wright, K. R.; Hutchinson, J. S. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1999,
1
+
1
is direct dissociation of HN3 (S1) into N2 (X ∑g ) and NH (a ∆),
due to a very small barrier on the pathway. A high barrier exists
1
, 1299.
(19) Alexander, M. H.; Werner, H.-J.; Dagdigian, P. J. J. Chem. Phys.
2
2
1988, 89, 1388.
20) Alexander, M. H.; Werner, H.-J.; Hemmer, T.; Knowles, P. J. J.
Chem. Phys. 1990, 93, 3307.
21) Yarkony, D. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 320.
on the S1 pathway to N3 (X Πg) + H ( S), which is nearly
(
inaccessible in energy at the long-wavelength region. Thus, the
decomposition of HN3 (S1) to N3 (X Πg) + H ( S) cannot
compete with the direct dissociation to N2 (X ∑g ) and NH
2
2
(
1
+
(22) Meier, U.; Staemmler, V. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 6111.
(23) Yamomoto, N.; Vreven, T.; Robb, M. A.; Frisch, M. J.; Schlegel,
J. B. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 250, 373.
1
(
a ∆). If the IC rate constant lies in the estimated higher limit,
the S1 f S0 IC is in competition with the direct dissociation.
The HN3 molecules in S1 which return to the ground electronic
state are left with sufficient internal energy to overcome the
(24) Dunning, T. H., Jr. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1007.
(25) McDouall, J. J.; Peasley, K.; Robb, M. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988,
48, 183.
1
1
+
(26) Scott, A. P.; Radom, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16502.
barrier of the spin-allowed dissociation to N2 (X ∑g ) + NH
(27) Gaussian 98 (Revision A.3): Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel,
1
1
+
(
a ∆) or the barrier of the spin-forbidden pathway to N2 (X ∑g )
H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.;
Montgomery, J. A.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam,
J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.;
Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Promelli, C.; Adamo,
C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.;
Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman,
J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.;
Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith,
T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.;
Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Chen, W.; Wong, M.
W.; Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A., Gaussian,
Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
-
+
NH (X3∑ ). A very small S0 f T1 probability reduces the
rate coefficient of the spin-forbidden dissociation by a factor
4
of about 10 . Therefore, the dominant product channel is still
N2 (X ∑g ) + NH (a ∆), as in S1. The present calculations
provide a good elucidation that the NH fragments are exclusively
1
+
1
1
in the a ∆ state in the UV photodissociation of HN3 at a
wavelength range from 355 to 248 nm. The triplet potential
energy surface is repulsive with respect to the interior N-N
2
2
separation. When N3 (X Πg) and H ( S) approach each other
(28) Eyring, H; Lin, S. H.; Lin, S. M. Basic Chemical Kinetics; Wiley:
along the triplet pathway, reaction 4 can occur, forming the
New York, 1980. Miller, W. H. J Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 6810.
(29) Winnewisser, B. P. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1980, 82, 220.
1
+
3
-
ground-state products of N2 (X ∑g ) + NH (X ∑ ), but it is
2
2
(30) Okabe, H. Photochemistry of Small Molecules; Wiley: New York,
978.
more efficient for N3 (X Πg) and H ( S) to combine, forming
1
the ground-state reactant of HN3.
(
(
31) Okabe, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 2726.
32) McDonald, J. R.; Rabalis, J. W.; McGlynn, S. P. J. Chem. Phys.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 29673007). I
am grateful to the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for
donation of an IBM/RS6000 workstation.
1970, 52, 1332.
33) Droz-Georget, T.; Zyrianov, M.; Reisler, H.; Chandler, D. W. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 1997, 276, 316.
34) Brown, S. S.; Berghout, H. L.; Crim, F. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1996,
105, 8103.
(
(
(35) Klossika, J.-J.; Floethmann, H.; Beck, B.; Schinke, R.; Yamashita,
K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 176, 325.
References and Notes
(36) Hammond, G. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 334.
(
29.
1) Kajimoto, O.; Yamamoto, T.; Fueno, T. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83,
(37) Barnes, R. J.; Sinha, A.; Dagdigian, P. J.; Lambert, H. M. J. Chem.
Phys. 1999, 111, 151.
4
(
2) Foy, B. R.; Casassa, M. P.; Stephenson, J. C.; King, D. S. J. Chem.
(38) Tuck, A. F. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 1977, 73, 689.
(39) Turro, N. J. Modern Molecular Photochemistry; Benjamin/Cum-
mings Publishing Co., Inc.: Menlo Park, CA, 1978; pp 165-170.
(40) Zyrianov, M.; Droz-Georget, Th.; Reisler, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1999,
110, 2059.
Phys. 1989, 90, 7037.
3) Foy, B. R.; Casassa, M. P.; Stephenson, J. C.; King, D. S. J. Chem.
Phys. 1990, 92, 2782.
4) Stephenson, J. C.; Casassa, M. P.; King, D. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1988,
9, 1378.
(
(
8
(41) Chen, I-C.; Moore, C. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 263.