1142
G. A. Eller, B. Datterl, and W. Holzer
Vol 44
700 mL) were refluxed for 90 min. The reaction mixture was
allowed to gain room temperature. Upon staying in the refrigerator
overnight, the product separated as orange crystals, which were
filtered off and washed with cold ethanol to yield 19.90 g (62%) of
differentiation between H-5/8 and H-6/7 was not unambiguously
possible; 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ 14.1 (CH3, 1J = 127.5 Hz,
2J(CH3,CH2) = 2.7 Hz), 62.9 (CH2, 1J = 148.9 Hz, 2J(CH2,CH3) = 4.5
Hz), 128.3* (C-5), 129.6* (C-8), 130.9* (C-7), 132.5* (C-6), 139.6*
(C-8a), 142.1* (C-4a), 143.8* (C-2), 144.7* (C-3), 163.8 (CO); *
the differentiation between C-2/3, C-4a/8a, C-5/8, and C-6/7 was not
unambiguously possible; 15N NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ –61.2 (N-
4), –47.7 (N-1); MS: 238 (M+, 3), 236 (M+, 8), 192 (23), 166
(33), 165 (21), 164 (100), 163 (40), 129 (42), 102 (50), 75 (21).
3-Chloroquinoxaline-2-carboxylic Acid (8). To ester 7 (9.94
g, 42 mmol), dissolved in aqueous methanol (80%, 200 mL),
was added Na2CO3 (2.50 g, 24 mmol) and the reaction mixture
was refluxed for 4 h. Then the solution was acidified with 2 M
HCl and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to
yield the crude acid 8, which was used 'as is' in the next reaction,
mp 142–145 °C (lit. [23] 146–147 °C); MS: m/z 210 (M+, 13),
208 (M+, 39), 166 (34), 164 (100), 129 (80), 102 (95), 76 (32),
75 (40), 50 (27).
1
4, mp 237–239 °C (lit. [21] 241–243 °C); H NMR (300 MHz,
DMSO-d6): ꢀ 2.37 (3H, s, Me), 7.22 (1H, m, H-6), 7.24 (1H, m, H-
8), 7.42 (1H, m, H-7), 7.65 (1H, m, H-5), 12.25 (1H, s, NH); 13C
NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): ꢀ 20.4 (Me, 1J = 128.4 Hz), 115.2 (C-8,
3
1
1J = 163.3 Hz, J(C-8,H-6) = 7.9 Hz), 122.9 (C-6, J = 163.1 Hz,
3J(C-6,H-8) = 8.5 Hz), 127.8 (C-5, 1J = 161.6 Hz, 3J(C-5,H-7) = 7.7
Hz), 129.2 (C-7, 1J = 163.3 Hz, 3J(C-7,H-5) = 8.5 Hz), 131.6 (C-4a),
3
2
131.9 (C-8a), 154.9 (C-2, J(C-2,Me) = 2.7 Hz), 159.1 (C-3, J(C-
3,Me) = 7.1 Hz); 15N NMR (50 MHz, DMSO-d6): ꢀ –233.0 (N-1), –
53.5 (N-4); MS: m/z 160 (M+, 82), 132 (97), 131 (100).
2-Chloro-3-methylquinoxaline (5). Quinoxalinone 4 (11.69
g, 73 mmol) and excess POCl3 (150 mL) were refluxed for 90 min.
Under reduced pressure, POCl3 was distilled off and the residue was
poured onto ice-water (~ 300 mL). Upon treatment of the solution
with concd. NH3 (pH was brought to 3–4) and standing for 3 h, the
red–brownish product 5 separated (6.17 g, 47%), mp 91–93 °C (lit.
3-Chloroquinoxaline-2-carbonyl Chloride (2). A suspen-
sion of the crude acid 8 in toluene (30 mL) was treated with
DMF (1 drop) and with excess SOCl2 (30 mL) and the mixture
was refluxed for 3 h. The solution was filtered, and the SOCl2
was removed under reduced pressure. Upon further concen-
tration under reduced pressure, the acid chloride 2 separated as
yellow crystals (3.46 g, 36%), mp 106–110 °C (lit. [25] 117–119
1
[22] 90–92 °C); H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ 2.81 (3H, s, Me),
7.68* (1H, m, H-7), 7.71* (1H, m, H-6), 7.94* (1H, m, H-8), 7.98*
(1H, m, H-5); * the differenttiation between H-5/8 and H-6/7 was
not unambiguously possible; 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ 23.2
1
(Me, J = 129.2 Hz), 128.1* (C-8), 128.4* (C-5), 129.9* (C-7),
1
°C, lit. [26] 127 °C); IR: CO 1778 cmꢀ1; H NMR (500 MHz,
130.0* (C-6), 140.8* (C-8a), 140.9* (C-4a), 147.7 (C-2, 3J(C-2,Me)
2
CDCl3): ꢀ 7.92* (1H, m, H-7), 7.98* (1H, m, H-6), 8.10* (1H, m,
H-5), 8.24* (1H, m, H-8); * the differentiation between H-5/8 and
H-6/7 was not unambiguously possible; 13C NMR (125 MHz,
CDCl3): ꢀ 128.3* (C-5), 130.1* (C-8), 131.7* (C-7), 134.3* (C-6),
139.4* (C-8a), 142.8* (C-4a), 142.9* (C-2), 143.0* (C-3), 166.0
(CO); * the differentiation between C-2/3, C-4a/8a, C-5/8, and C-6/7
was not unambiguously possible; 15N NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ –
57.8 (N-4), –40.6 (N-1); MS: m/z 230 (M+, 2), 228 (M+, 10), 226
(M+, 15), 193 (17), 191 (47), 165 (31), 163 (100), 102 (49), 75
(19). Anal. Calcd. for C9H4Cl2N2O: C, 47.61; H, 1.78; N, 12.34.
Found: C, 47.79; H, 2.01; N, 12.39.
= 3.8 Hz), 152.7 (C-3, J(C-3,Me) = 7.0 Hz); * the differentiation
between C-4a/8a, C-5/8, and C-6/7 was not unambiguously
possible; 15N NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ –67.3 (N-1), –50.6 (N-4);
MS: m/z 180 (M+, 12), 178 (M+, 39), 143 (100), 102 (29).
Ethyl 3-Oxo-3,4-dihydroquinoxaline-2-carboxylate (6). To a
suspension of diethyl oxomalonate (26.56 g, 150 mmol) in ethanol
(96%, 250 mL) was added o-phenylenediamine (16.44 g, 150
mmol). The mixture was refluxed for 2 h and the hot solution was
filtered. After addition of water (400 mL) the mixture was
refluxed again until the solution became clear. This solution was
filtered again, and upon standing at room temperature overnight,
product 6 crystallized as yellowish needles (24.51 g, 75%), mp
176–178 °C (lit. [23] 175.5–176.5 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz,
Acknowledgement. We are grateful to Dr. L. Jirovetz
for recording the mass spectra.
3
CDCl3): ꢀ 1.46 (3H, t, J(CH3,CH2) = 7.1 Hz, CH3), 4.54 (2H, q,
3J(CH2,CH3) = 7.1 Hz, CH2), 7.39 (1H, m, H-7), 7.47 (1H, m, H-
5), 7.61 (1H, m, H-6), 7.93 (1H, m, H-8), 12.95 (1H, s, NH); 13C
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ 14.2 (CH3, 1J = 127.4 Hz, 2J(CH3,CH2)
= 2.6 Hz), 62.5 (CH2, 1J = 148.7 Hz, 2J(CH2,CH3) = 4.5 Hz), 116.4
(C-5), 124.9 (C-7), 130.1 (C-8), 132.0 (C-8a), 132.2 (C-4a), 132.7
(C-6), 148.5 (C-2), 154.6 (C-3), 163.4 (CO); 15N NMR (50 MHz,
CDCl3): ꢀ –225.0 (N-4), –40.3 (N-1); MS: m/z 218 (M+, 56), 174
(31), 146 (100), 145 (34), 144 (35), 118 (68), 90 (58).
REFERENCES
[1] Eller, G. A.; Wimmer, V.; Haring, A. W.; Holzer, W.
Synthesis 2006, 4219.
[2] Eller, G. A.; Haring, A. W.; Datterl, B.; Zwettler, M.;
Holzer, W. Heterocycles 2007, 71, 87.
[3] Eller, G. A.; Holzer, W. Molecules 2007, 12, 60.
[4] Minkin, V. I.; Garnovskii, A. D.; Elguero, J.; Katritzky,
A. R.; Denisko, O. V. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 2000, 76, 157; Chem.
Abstr. 2000, 133, 309576.
[5] Jensen, B. S. Acta Chem. Scand. 1959, 13, 1668; Chem.
Abstr. 1962, 56, 66890.
[6] Gobec, S.; Urleb, U. Sci. Synth. 2004, 16, 845; Chem.
Abstr. 2004, 142, 93707.
[7] Kleemann, A.; Engel, J.; Kutscher, B.; Reichert, D.
Pharmaceutical Substances: Syntheses, Patents, Applications, 4th
ed., Thieme, Stuttgart, 2001, p. 259.
[8] Cantor, L. B. Ther. Clin. Risk Manage. 2006, 2, 337.
[9] Mahesh, R.; Perumal, R. V.; Pandi, P. V. Biol. Pharm.
Bull. 2004, 27, 1403.
[10] Braun, S.; Kalinowski, H.-O.; Berger, S. 150 and More
Basic NMR Experiments: A Practical Course, 2nd ed., Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 1998, pp. 596; Chem. Abstr. 1999, 131, 184497.
Ethyl 3-Chloroquinoxaline-2-carboxylate (7). A mixture of
quinoxalinone 6 (18.95 g, 85 mmol) and excess POCl3 (100 mL)
was refluxed for 30 min. Under reduced pressure, POCl3 was
distilled off and the residue was poured onto ice-water (~ 300
mL). Upon neutralization with concentrated NH3, product 7
separated and was then collected by filtration. To increase the
yield, the filtrate was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 x 50 mL) and the
combined organic layers were washed once with water (10 mL),
dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated to dryness under
reduced pressure. Compound 7 was obtained as a beige solid in
1
a total yield of 95% (19.11 g), mp 40 °C (lit. [24] 40 °C); H
3
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ 1.46 (3H, t, J(CH3,CH2) = 7.2 Hz,
CH3), 4.55 (2H, q, 3J(CH2,CH3) = 7.2 Hz, CH2), 7.80* (1H, m, H-7),
7.85* (1H, m, H-6), 8.03* (1H, m, H-5), 8.15* (1H, m, H-8); * the