10.1002/cctc.201800681
ChemCatChem
ARTICLE
under nitrogen atmosphere with vigorous stirring. The solution was
incubated in an ice bath and 1.25 g of sodium borohydride was slowly
added. The solution was stirred at 4 ℃ overnight, until the gas evolution
ceased. The catalyst was removed by gravity filtration, and methanol was
removed from the filtrate by vacuum evaporation. 30 mL of water was
added to dissolve the solid that was then extracted with DCM (50 mL×5).
The organic phase was dried with NaSO4 and then, the solvent was
removed. The product was a white solid.
This work was supported partly by the French PIA project «
Lorraine Université d’Excellence », reference ANR-15-IDEX-04-
LUE. L.Z. gratefully acknowledges CNRS and Region Grand Est
for Ph.D. funding. We also thank Aurelien Renard (LCPME) for
XPS measurements.
Keywords: [Cp*Rh(bpy)Cl]+ mediator • dehydrogenase • NADH
• co-immobilization • bioelectrocatalytic reactor
2, 2’-bipyridine functionalized BP electrode
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
C. E. Paul, I. W. C. E. Arends, F. Hollmann, ACS Catal. 2014, 4,
788–797.
1 mM of 4-amino-2,2’-bipyridine was mixed with 2 mM of sodium nitrite in
0.5 M HCl aqueous solution under stirring for 5 min to generate 2,2’-
bipyridyl diazonium cations. The electrografting on the BP electrode was
achieved by running two cyclic voltammograms from 0.4 V to -0.8 V in this
solution. These parameters were adapted from two previous work
involving diazonium electrografting.[22,39] After electrografting, the
electrode was rinsed carefully with water and left to dry before use.
A. Weckbecker, H. Gröger, W. Hummel, Adv. Biochem. Eng.
Biotechnol. 2010, 120, 195–242.
R. Wichmann, D. Vasic-Racki, Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.
2005, 92, 225–260.
V. Urbanova, G. W. Kohring, T. Klein, Z. Wang, O. Mert, M.
Emrullahoglu, K. Buran, A. S. Demir, M. Etienne, A. Walcarius, Z.
Phys. Chem. 2013, 227, 667–689.
[Cp*Rh(bpy)Cl]+ functionalized BP electrode
The 2,2’-bipyridine functionalized electrode was immersed for 4 h into a
DCM solution containing 0.15 mM ((RhCp*Cl2)2. A gentle stirring was
applied. Then, the electrode was rinsed with DCM before to be immersed
inside a second DCM volume for 5 min to remove the unreacted residues.
[5]
L. Zhang, M. Etienne, N. Vilà, A. Walcarius, in Funct. Electrodes
Enzym. Microb. Electrochem. Syst. (Eds.: N. Brun, V. Flexer), World
Scientific, 2017, pp. 215–271.
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
R. Ruppert, S. Herrmann, E. Steckhan, Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28,
6583–6586.
Immobilization of DSDH inside a glassy fiber layer
F. Hollmann, B. Witholt, A. Schmid, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2002,
19–20, 167–176.
A sol containing DSDH was prepared following the reported protocol.[40]
0.18 g of TEOS and 0.13 g of GPS were mixed together with 0.5 mL water
and 0.625 mL 0.01 M HCl and stirred overnight. Then, this sol was diluted
3 times and a 40 µL aliquot was mixed with 20 µL of PEI solution (20%),
20 µL of water and 30 µL of DSDH stock solutions. A piece of glassy fiber
layer that had the same shape as the bucky paper electrode was prepared.
It was then modified by the sol containing DSDH (50 µL cm-2). Before use,
the modified layer was dried overnight at 4 ℃. The glassy fiber layer
modified with DSDH (1 cm2 or 4 cm2) was put on the top of the
[Cp*Rh(bpy)Cl]+ functionalized bucky paper electrode (same geometric
surface area) and the electroenzymatic experiment was performed.
F. Hildebrand, C. Kohlmann, A. Franz, S. Lütz, Adv. Synth. Catal.
2008, 350, 909–918.
J. Gajdzik, J. Lenz, H. Natter, a. Walcarius, G. W. Kohring, F.
Giffhorn, M. Gꢀllꢁ, a. S. Demir, R. Hempelmann, J. Electrochem.
Soc. 2012, 159, F10.
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
L. Gorton, E. Dominguez, in Encycl. Electrochem., Wiley-VCH
Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2007, pp. 67–143.
S. Kochius, A. O. Magnusson, F. Hollmann, J. Schrader, D.
Holtmann, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 2251–2264.
M. Poizat, I. W. C. E. Arends, F. Hollmann, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym.
2010, 63, 149–156.
Apparatus
J. Lutz, F. Hollmann, T. V. Ho, A. Schnyder, R. H. Fish, A. Schmid,
J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 4783–4790.
F. Hildebrand, S. Lütz, Chem. - A Eur. J. 2009, 15, 4998–5001.
S. Chardon-Noblat, S. Cosnier, A. Deronzier, N. Vlachopoulos, J.
Electroanal. Chem. 1993, 352, 213–228.
All electrochemical experiments were conducted with an Autolab
PGSTAT-12 potentiostat. The three-electrode configuration cell included
an Ag/AgCl reference electrode (3 M KCl), a stainless steel or a titanium
auxiliary electrode, and a piece of BP as working electrode. Glassy carbon
plates and a stainless steel clip were used for connecting the BP electrode.
The NADH regeneration was evaluated by measuring the absorbance of
the electrolyte between 300 and 400 nm with a Cary 60 Scan UV-Vis
spectrophotometer. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) analyses
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
M. Beley, J.-P. Collin, J. Mol. Catal. 1993, 79, 133–140.
J. H. van Esch, M. A. M. Hoffmann, R. J. M. Nolte, J. Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 1599–1610.
were performed using
a KRATOS Axis Ultra X-ray photoelectron
spectrometer (Kratos Analytical, Manchester, UK) equipped with
a
[18]
E. Höfer, E. Steckhan, B. Ramos, W. R. Heineman, J. Electroanal.
Chem. 1996, 402, 115–122.
monochromated AlKα X-ray source (hν = 1486.6 eV) operated at 150 W.
The base pressure in the analytical chamber was 10-9 mbar during XPS
measurements. Wide scans were recorded using a pass energy of 160 eV
and narrow scans using a pass energy of 20 eV (instrumental resolution
better than 0.5 eV). Charge correction was carried out using the C(1s) core
line, setting adventitious carbon signal (H/C signal) to 284.6 eV.
[19]
[20]
E. Steckhan, in Top. Curr. Chem., 1994, pp. 83–111.
B. Tan, D. P. Hickey, R. D. Milton, F. Giroud, S. D. Minteer, J.
Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, H102–H107.
[21]
[22]
[23]
J. S. Lee, S. H. Lee, J. Kim, C. B. Park, J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1,
1040–1044.
L. Zhang, N. Vilà, G. W. Kohring, A. Walcarius, M. Etienne, ACS
Catal. 2017, 7, 4386–4394.
Acknowledgements
M. R. Axet, O. Dechy-Cabaret, J. Durand, M. Gouygou, P. Serp,
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.