8294 J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 58, No. 14, 2010
Pfeifer and Kroh
(1S,2R)-1-(3-Methyl-2-quinoxalinyl)-1,2,3-propanetriol (1-DG-quinox-
aline) was prepared largely according to the method of Beck and Ledl (14)
via the Amadori compounds.
GC-MS (1-DG-quinoxaline after acetylation): tR, 24.38 min; m/z 360
(0.2%, Mþ), 301 (4), 300 (4), 241 (18), 199 (51), 198 (12), 174 (100), 157 (5),
143 (23), 107 (22), 103 (9), 43 (96).
was trapped with 500 μL of 0.05 M 1,2-diaminobenzene solution
to intercept the R-dicarbonyls as quinoxalines. After 3 h at 25 °C,
quinoxalines were analyzed by HPLC-DAD and GC-MS after acetyla-
tion. The molecular ions (MS-EI) of labeled and unlabeled acetylated
(1S,2R)-1-(3-methyl-2-quinoxalinyl)-2-ethyl alcohol [230 (10, [Mþ])/
231 (10, [Mþ])] were used for the quantification.
(1R,2S,3R)-1-(2-Quinoxalinyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroxybutane (glucosone-
quinoxaline) was carried out according to the method of Morita et al. (15).
GC-MS (glucosone-quinoxaline after acetylation): tR, 30.66 min; m/z
418 (0.2%, Mþ), 359 (2), 358 (2), 299 (63), 257 (11), 215 (14), 213 (9), 202
(50), 196 (8), 160 (100), 143 (4), 129 (10), 115 (12), 102 (7), 43 (97).
(1S,2R)-1-(3-Methyl-2-quinoxalinyl)-2,3-propanediol (1,4-DDH-quinox-
aline) was prepared largely according to the method of Morita et al. (15).
GC-MS (1,4-DDH-quinoxaline after acetylation): tR, 22.31 min; m/z
302 (0.2%, Mþ), 243 (16), 242 (7), 183 (100), 171 (40), 158 (77), 143 (7), 117
(9), 102 (9).
Model Reaction Food Items. In a typical experiment 5.00 g of food
sample was milled and roasted at 150/170 °C. After a defined time, the
samples were derivatized for 30 min with 10 mL of 0.05 M 1,2-diamino-
benzene solution, filtered, centrifuged at 6000 U, and analyzed by HPLC-
DAD and GC-MS after acetylation.
Chromatography. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed
on silica gel 60 F254 plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Preparative
column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60, 40-63 μm (Merck).
All solvents were of chromatographic grade.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (NMR). NMR spectra
were recorded on a Bruker AC 400 instrument (Rheinstetten, Germany).
Chemical shifts are given in parts per million relative to residual non-
deuterated solvent as an internal reference.
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC-DAD) In-
strumentation: degasser, Gegasys DG-13000 (Knauer); pump, Shimadzu
LC-10 AT; thermostat, 30 °C, Shimadzu CT0-6A; guard column, Nucleosil
120-5 C18 Macherey-Nagel; column, Nucleosil 5 C18 (250 mm ꢀ 4.6 mm);
injection volume, 40 μL; eluent, methanol/water gradient, 1 mL/min.
Gas Chromatography (GC-MS). The samples were extracted with
n-butanol. The solvent was dried off, the residue was dissolved in toluene,
and acetic anhydride was added (18). Gas chromatography instrumenta-
tion: Finnigan GCQ; capillary column, BPX 5 (SGE, 30 m, 0.25 mm i.d.,
0.5 μm film thickness); carrier gas, helium 4.6; detector, Finnigan Ion Trap
Mass Analyzer GCQ; injection temperature, 270 °C; split 1:10; tempera-
ture program, initial temperature, 95 °C, held for 1 min, raised from 95 to
200 °C at 15 °C/min, 200 °C held for 1 min, raised from 200 to 280 °C at
3 °C/min, 280 °C held for 5 min, raised from 280 to 300 °C at 5 °C/min,
300 °C held for 5 min. Column effluents were analyzed by selected ion
monitoring (SIM). Quantification was carried out by comparison of peak
areas obtained in the TIC with those of standard solutions containing
amounts of pure authentic reference compounds.
(2S,3R)-1-(2-Quinoxalinyl)-2,3dihydroxypropane (3-DP-quinoxaline).
This synthesis was performed as described by Hollnagel and Kroh (16).
GC-MS (3-DP-quinoxaline after acetylation): tR, 21.28 min; m/z 288
(0.3%, Mþ), 229 (5), 228 (4), 169 (42), 157 (24), 144 (37), 129 (3), 117 (4),
43 (100).
1,4-Dideoxypentodiulose (17, 19, 20). To a solution of 3-pentyn-1-ol
(2 mL, 26 mmol) in CHCl3 (60 mL) and MeCN (60 mL) was added NaIO4
(12.84 g, 60 mmol) in H2O (120 mL). The mixture was vigorously stirred,
and RuO2 H2O (120 mg, 0.79 mmol) was added. Stirring was continued
3
for 15 min in the presence of air at ambient temperature. Then the reaction
mixture was filtered through a pad of silica and rinsed with CH2Cl2 as the
eluent. The solution was dried with Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo to
give a yellow oil. Purification via flash chromatography on silica (EtOAc/
pentane, 1:1) afforded pure 1,4-dideoxypentodiulose (2.02 g) in 67% yield.
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.45 (s, 2.5, -CH3) þ 2.34 (s, 0.5,
-CH3), 2.60 (m, 1.6, -CH2) þ 2.99 (m, 0.4, -CH2), 3.92 (m, 0.4, -CH2) þ
4.24 (m, 1.6, -CH2).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 21.3, 23.5, 33.6, 38.4, 57.3, 61.9, 96.5,
197.0, 198.4, 209.9.
(1S,2R)-1-(3-Methyl-2-quinoxalinyl)-2-ethyl Alcohol. 1,4-Dideoxy-
pentodiulose (200 mg, 1.72 mmol) and 1,2-diaminobenzene (167 mg, 1.55
mmol) were stirred for 30 min at 100 °C in an evacuated 5 mL flask. Puri-
fication via flash chromatography on silica (EtOAc/pentane, 1:1, EtOAc)
afforded pure (1S,2R)-1-(3-methyl-2-quinoxalinyl)-2-ethyl alcohol (313 mg)
in 98% yield as a bright orange solid.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Various studies concerning the relevance of
thermally treated food have been performed to date. It is well-
known that by thermal treatment of -methionine both in the
L-methionine in
1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O): δ 2.62 (s, 3, -CH3), 3.12 (t, 2, J = 6.8 Hz,
-CH2), 3.98 (t, 2, J = 6.8 Hz, -CH2), 7.70 (m, 2, Ar-H), 7.77 (m, 2,
Ar-H).
L
absence or in the presence of carbohydrate/dicarbonyl com-
pound one of the main products is methional (10). Many
investigations have been accomplished, although only limited
information about the reaction pathways of the carbohydrate
compounds in these model systems is available. Does the
formation of specific R-dicarbonyl compounds depend on the
13C NMR (75 MHz, D2O): δ 21.5, 37.2, 60.0, 126.7, 127.0, 129.7, 129.9,
139.3, 139.6, 154.3, 154.5.
GC-MS (1,4-DDP-quinoxaline after acetylation): tR, 16.06 min; m/z
230 (0.2%, Mþ), 188 (13), 187 (100), 169 (100), 159 (44), 158 (36), 144 (8),
117 (9), 77 (7).
Model Reactions. In a typical experiment an aqueous solution of
presence of
the amino acid? Furthermore, the interest is directed toward
the use of different carbohydrates. -Glucose was used as a
L-methionine, or is there no specific influence by
carbohydrate (1 mmol) and amino acid (1 mmol) (L-methionine,
L-phenyl-
alanine, -alanine, γ-aminobutyric acid, -leucine,
L
L
L-cysteine, L-aspar-
D
agine) in 10 mL of H2O was adjusted to a pH of 3 or 5 with 3 N HCl or
to a pH of 8 with 3 N NaOH.
typical monosaccharide in food, maltose as an agent for
disaccharides, and dextrin 10 as an agent for oligosaccharides,
which showed in previous works that reaction behavior is
different compared to monosaccharides (16).
Within this work various model reactions with different
carbohydrates (mono-, di-, and oligosaccharides) and the amino
The model solutions were heated in sealed ampules at 100 ( 1 or 130 (
1 °C for up to 300 min in a thermo block (Behr Labor Technik, behrotest
ET2). After a defined reaction time, 500 μL of the samples was trapped
with 500 μL of 0.05 M 1,2-diaminobenzene solution to intercept the
R-dicarbonyls as quinoxalines. After 3 h at 25 °C, quinoxalines were
analyzed by HPLC-DAD and GC-MS after acetylation. Values were
expressed as the means of at least three independent determinations.
Model Reaction Diacetyl/Formaldehyde. In a typical experiment
an aqueous solution of diacetyl (1 mmol) and formaldehyde (37%) (1 mmol)
in 1.00 mL of H2O was adjusted to a pH of 8. The model solution was stirred
for 10 min at ambient temperature and then trapped with 1.00 mL of 0.05 M
1,2-diaminobenzene solution to intercept the R-dicarbonyls as quinoxalines.
acid L-methionine were performed in aqueous solutions (starting
with pH 3, 5, and 8). The samples were heated in sealed ampules
at 130 °C for a defined time and then treated with 0.5 M 1,2-
diaminobenzene solution to trap the arising R-dicarbonyl com-
pounds as stable, measurable quinoxalines (16).
In line with our investigations with L-methionine as amino
component, an unidentified peak could be found in the HPLC
chromatogram, which showed the typical UV spectrum of a
quinoxaline (Figure 1).
Remarkably, this unknown component is only generated in the
model system with L-methionine as the amino compound and
Labeling Experiments. An aqueous solution of [13C1]-
(1 mmol) or [13C]-
-glucose (1 mmol) and -methionine (1 mmol) in
D-glucose
D
L
10 mL of H2O was adjusted to a pH of 5. The model solution was heated
in sealed ampules at 130(1 °C for up to 120 min in a thermo block
(Behr Labor Technik, behrotest ET2). Afterward, 500 μL of the sample